The Daily of the University of Washington

Left, Right and Center: US foreign policy in Somalia after the Maersk Alabama incident

April 21, 2009


Conservative

By John Fay


Somalia may be the best example of what the world was like before governments. It is a nation so bereft of anything we would naturally associate with nations, that the word barely even qualifies. It has no real central government, rather, a collection of ruthless warlords vying for power. Women have essentially no rights but are still apt to outlive the males by six years because men keep killing each other.

We in the United States were recently forced to acknowledge the harsh reality of such a world when several of our citizens were kidnapped on the Maersk Alabama by Somali pirates, and the story that ensued should teach us some lessons about the realities of life in a dangerous world.

We all know how the story ends, of course. Navy seals, on the orders of President Obama, simultaneously shot three pirates and rescued the ship’s captain, becoming instant heroes and endowing Obama with the gravitas of strong leadership. Let us not forget, however, that when leaders make decisions, they are often life and death decisions, not life or death decisions.

This means that when someone lives, someone else has to die; an American citizen is alive today because three other men are dead. They may have deserved it, it may have been necessary, but they are nonetheless dead.

In contemplating this, I couldn’t help but remember a story from the Bible. When David asked God for permission to build a temple, God forbade him to do so because he fought to defend the people of Israel from evil. It was not morally wrong for David to shed blood, but in some sense, spiritually defiling. This, I believe, is the price presidents and warriors alike must pay. This is why I believe that soldiers are truly heroes, because by serving in warfare, they have voluntarily given up their innocence so that we can maintain our own.

The first lesson is for Obama: Being president of the United States is not a blessing, it is a burden. This victory will not be enough. We will need to establish a major naval presence in the East African region. We will need to continue to engage these pirates on the high seas and in their shore bases because they will continue to attack our citizens until the high casualty rate renders the prospect unprofitable for them.

The reason why our leaders and military were able to act is because the ship crew acted first. They realized that though we have leaders who make decisions, often we must take matters into our own hands. They captured one of the pirates, and the captain sacrificed his freedom for his crew.

In normal society, we are trained to be passive in the face of violence. This ignores the philosophical truth that whenever two people are together and one is passive and the other is violent, violence, not peace, will be the result. When faced with evil, we must be prepared to abandon passivity — to abandon, our own innocence in order to protect our friends. We can be proud of what happened this week, but when we are done patting ourselves on the back, this incident teaches a sober lesson we are often too quick to forget.

Reach columnist John Fay at opinion@dailyuw.com.

Liberal

By Greg Ryan


The capture by pirates of Captain Richard Philips of the Maersk Alabama off the Horn of Africa and his subsequent rescue by the U.S. Navy has cast a spotlight on the growing problem of piracy in the region and the ways we should combat it, but has failed to generate significant attention for the true culprit in this crisis. The only questions being asked are about how to treat the symptom of piracy and not the disease of poverty and lawlessness.

It has been the greatest question of the entire postwar era — far more important than capitalism versus communism.

“Development,” “nation building,” “liberalization,” “good governance” — all of the theories, buzzwords, interventions and good intentions have come and gone and largely failed. In vogue now is the idea that everything the First World has done over that last century to help the poorer people of the world has delivered far more harm on the balance. This harm is, of course, itself dwarfed by the deliberate destruction and exploitation perpetrated on most of the planet by the wealthy and powerful minority.

Even if there was agreement on the causes of poverty and lawlessness in places like Somalia — where those four teenagers had such meager prospects for a legitimate future and so little to lose that they turned to piracy — we would only be marginally closer to a solution.

Though Somalia possesses an internationally recognized government, this government does not possess Somalia. It is less a country and more of a geographical area with ambitiously specific borders. Within those borders, there is such a crisis of basic sustenance and security, and such a deficit of opportunity and surplus of weapons as to make taking on a container ship seem like a neat idea.

The poverty and powerlessness in Somalia has a hundred twins with a hundred different faces all over this world. Barack Obama’s message of hope was taken by many in the Third World to apply to everyone, not just Americans. Something — many things — about Obama resonated with the world’s poor and disenfranchised peoples. Yet, solving the problem of global poverty was, among all those hopes I have for the world, left uninspired by Obama’s election. Changing the direction of U.S. global economic policy or reforming our dubious aid strategy would pit his administration against all of the most powerful and moneyed interests in government.

The three simultaneous head shots which killed the three pirates holding Philips demonstrate how in each individual encounter with an enemy, the U.S. will always prevail, even while struggling in the large war. The solutions we have heard for dealing with the piracy crisis — and sometimes with Somalia itself — have concentrated on the use of this amazing power we possess. Thinking we can fight our way out of every problem is an American legacy we should be loath to repeat again. Unfortunately, addressing the issue properly would be to end poverty, spread democracy, and ensure safety, plenty and equality for all people. So far, no one has figured out how.

Reach columnist Greg Ryan at opinion@dailyuw.com.

Moderate

By Katie Paff


In the midst of economic turmoil and a drug war in Mexico, the U.S. government must now contend with a new menace that is threatening world stability: Somali piracy.

While President Obama’s decision last weekend to authorize force against the Somali pirates may have been successful, it is ultimately only the beginning of a long-term military effort.

This was not an isolated incident; this year alone, pirates have attacked dozens of vessels in the Gulf of Aden and the Indian ocean and held more than 300 innocent sailors hostage until yesterday. Phillips just happened to be the first sailor kidnapped from a U.S. vessel. He was courageous to the core and offered himself up as a hostage in exchange for his crew to remain safe. A native of Vermont and a die-hard Red Sox fan, he is a modern-day American hero. This was a hostage crisis of the most extreme nature.

His rescue proved dramatic; about two weeks ago, Phillips was freed as U.S. Navy snipers shot three of the Somali captors dead. Now, we must deal with the crisis at hand. It begs the question, have we stood up to a bully or merely awakened a sleeping giant? There’s no question about it; it’s a struggle similar to fighting terrorists. President Obama is urging the U.S. government to work with our allies to fight a new kind of villain.

A lot of options have been laid on the table, such as arming crews, an international moratorium on ransom payments and a system of World War II style escorts and convoys. Ultimately, however, the best solution will probably be to use the military, with its rapid reaction, deadly force, exclusion zones and inspections.

Some question whether military action is the right move — some attribute terrorism to poor economic policy in third world countries — however, this is, at the very least, absurd. They argue that these Somali pirates do so because it is their only alternative to poverty and starvation. This is completely illogical. If the incentives for piracy are economic, then a decreased likelihood of booty ought to decrease it, yet nobody seems to expect this to happen.

Somalia is ultimately the quintessential failed state, but the pirates don’t need a state — piracy is their state. The pirates are smart and are the maritime wing of a warlord society that rules Somalia, which, in turn helps its citizens starve. Before the United States can help Somalia re-establish itself as a nation, it must defeat the pirates militarily. It is the only solution.

Reach columnist Katie Paff at opinion@dailyuw.com.


1 Comments

#1 Cody L.
(UW Campus)
on April 22, 2009 at 7:02 p.m.

John Fay: "....the philosophical truth that whenever two people are together and one is passive and the other is violent, violence, not peace, will be the result."

-

Jesus: "But I tell you who hear me: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. If someone strikes you on one cheek, turn to him the other also. If someone takes your cloak, do not stop him from taking your tunic. Give to everyone who asks you, and if anyone takes what belongs to you, do not demand it back. Do to others as you would have them do to you."


Post a comment

You must login with your dailyuw.com account or connect with Facebook to post a comment.

If you have any questions about this policy, send us an email. We'd love to hear your thoughts.

2 Comments

#1 Rebecca_F
(UW Campus)
on April 21, 2009 at 2:42 p.m.

Mr. Ryan, would it be correct to say you believe the U.S. has the responsibility of taking a pro-active role in spreading democratic (lower-case-d) government to less privledged nations? . . . because that's where it sounds like your argument is going.

#2 Rebecca_F
(UW Campus)
on April 21, 2009 at 2:50 p.m.

"The only questions being asked are about how to treat the symptom of piracy and not the disease of poverty and lawlessness. [paragraph] It has been the greatest question of the entire postwar era - far more important than capitalism versus communism."
Proponants of capitalism and communism would typically both claim that their system would reduce poverty and/or that the other side would increase poverty. And if you consider state-sanctioned atrocities and loss of liberties in your discussion of lawlessness, then the communism/capitalism debate has plenty to do with that, too.


Post a comment

You must login with your dailyuw.com account or connect with Facebook to post a comment.

If you have any questions about this policy, send us an email. We'd love to hear your thoughts.

0 Comments


Post a comment

You must login with your dailyuw.com account or connect with Facebook to post a comment.

If you have any questions about this policy, send us an email. We'd love to hear your thoughts.