The Daily of the University of Washington

Credit Card Act goes into effect, students discuss implications


View this day's paper in PDF

Junior Reid Mortimer has owned a credit card since his freshman year at the UW. Now, midway through his junior year, he hopes to use the points he’s accumulated to travel abroad after graduation. Mortimer considers himself financially responsible, never making purchases beyond his means. While the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 that went into effect yesterday will regulate young people’s ability to get credit cards, he feels that it will add transparency to the system.


Photo by Patrick Riley.

WashPIRG student volunteer Christa Davis talks to members of the media about the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009. “The era of aggressive hawking of cards with really bad terms is gone for now,” Davis said.


Signed in May 2009 by President Obama, the regulations of this act were discussed at a WashPIRG press conference held on campus yesterday. Proponents of the act hope that the restrictions will curb misuse of credit cards, protect consumers and add transparency to the charges card companies levy on delinquent customers.

“It’s a historic reform that will save consumers millions of dollars in unfair credit-card fees and interest because of ‘gotcha’ tricks and traps that the industry began imposing over the last ten years,” said Ed Mierzwinski, consumer program director for U.S. PIRG in a conference call with student leaders Thursday. “People got stuck on a debt treadmill.”

The average university student graduates with $4,100 in credit-card debt, according to a study released Feb. 15 by the nation’s largest student-loan provider Sallie Mae. Certain clauses of the act will directly affect college students and young adults.

One new regulation requires prospective card holders to submit to credit verifications. These “background checks” require anyone between the ages of 18 and 21 to find a cosigner or present evidence of a steady income or another source of payment.

“I think specifically for people our age and our demographic, we face predatory lending as exemplified by the steady stream of credit-card applications,” ASUW President Tim Mensing said. “It’s pretty relevant for people our age who are just learning to manage our finances.”

Mensing served as the student representative for a conference call last week to discuss the national U.S. PIRG campaign, The Truth About Credit. He said that, with tuition on the rise, more students rely on credit cards to fund their education, resulting in large sums of debt at graduation.

Mensing spoke of the financial illiteracy among young adults during the call; he said that many students don’t understand how short-term loans function and the consequences of postponing payment.

“This is particularly dangerous,” said Lauren Kim, campus organizer for the UW branch of WashPIRG. “There aren’t financial or fiscal responsibility courses in high school, and … [money] is still a very taboo topic within American culture.”

Kim said that the regulations are necessary among today’s students who are graduating with higher rates of debt into a floundering economy with fewer jobs.

“Students, when they enter college, have all these financial products advertised to them with these supposedly good deals,” Kim said. “But they don’t have any experience or know what good versus bad deals look like for financial products like credit cards.”

The bill pays special attention to young adults, who are targeted by lenders for their lack of financial literacy. In addition to creating mandatory credit verifications, it would require the disclosure of contracts between universities and credit-card companies. Many colleges exclusively use one ATM on campus or have affinity credit cards displaying the school’s mascot. Other regulations would prevent companies from luring students with freebies and giveaways in exchange for card applications.

General consumers will also be safe from hair-trigger raises to interest rates after late payments. Companies will now have to tell individuals 45 days in advance of a rate change, allowing consumers to cancel the card if they don’t agree with the additional fees.

“Students and non-students alike often miss the fact that plastic equals money, and credit can be really dangerous,” Mortimer said.

But opponents of the bill claim that credit cards serve as a lifeline for students who are otherwise unable to afford textbooks, tuition and basic necessities. The regulations, they say, only create more obstacles.

“That being said … people who get into credit-card debt and have money problems [do so] because their [parents] controlled their monetary life [and] are in dire need of financial education,” Mortimer said. “Having a cosigner [for 18- to 21-year-olds] won’t remedy either of these issues once they turn 22.”

Mensing agreed that the new regulations are not perfect and that high rates of debt are a national problem that cannot be solved by a single new law. He said that the new regulations won’t overcome the widespread financial illiteracy of students and the broader public.

“There have been discussions about having a finance 101 course; maybe [that’s] part of the solution, a required or mandated class,” Mensing said. “If there was a course available, I think a lot of students would take it.”

Until then, the U.S. PIRG continues to eagerly push for further development of the bill.

“There’s always going to be new ways that banks and credit-card companies can rip off consumers on fees,” Kim said. “There’s still a long way to go, but this is definitely a huge step, especially in terms of protecting the most vulnerable young consumers who are getting their first taste of credit cards.”

Reach reporter Celina Kareiva at news@dailyuw.com.



5 Comments

#1 Philip L

on February 23, 2010 at 9:52 a.m.

I stand astonished as a peer of these students who see this act as a positive step forward.

According to this act, we as consumers are little concerned with knowing what we do, and must be protected by government. This problem of poor individual financial hygiene should not be foisted upon the public, especially when the fraction of individuals in the population who have this problem of credit card debt is small.

For those of us who were informed enough to know how to use a credit card, and paid out responsibly, we will now find ourselves charged with fees thanks to the helpless uninformed, and the predator of government seeking to help. We will now be subject to annual fees for having a card, fees for not using the card enough, fees to receive our bills in the mail, and for those of us who do have to carry a balance occasionally -- like the students who use credit cards for short-term loans for supplies -- this will be met with higher rates.

Card companies already are making it harder to obtain credit thanks to so many defaults during the recession, to mitigate their risks of having to deal with more defaulting accounts. Now with this act, which makes it easier for consumers to assume greater risk since the consequences will be that much more distanced, how will companies respond? These companies, unlike my peers who charge without knowing what they hold in their hands, are not above informing themselves when it comes to their self-interest.

There is no escaping the law of unintended consequences, and this intervention into credit card markets will surely bear this fact out. As a financially responsible, working, full-time student, I congratulate my poorly informed peer actors in the community for bringing additional fees on us all!

#2 Katie

on February 23, 2010 at 10:36 a.m.

Philip, it's great that you might be able to wade through the tiny font of a 30 page credit card contract and understand all the legal language and conditions, but most people, whether they are 18 or 80, probably don't understand it, nor would be protected from conditions that are left out.

The fact is most students, 66%, have credit cards who on average graduate with $3,000 in credit card debt on top of student loans. So no, this problem is BIG in our peer group, and even worse in our country, where the average family has $10k in credit card debt.

Having banks make credit card conditions more transparent and having to treat our age group like any other adult by showing our ability to pay (just like when you apply for an apartment) is fair and will protect many students from getting credit cards that can't pay off.

Students should be fiscally responsible, but banks also need to be ethically responsible---subprime mortages ring a bell?

#3 Accountability

on February 23, 2010 at 5:52 p.m.

It's because of the American culture of "passing the buck". No one wants to take responsibility for their actions- it's always someone elses's fault!

Credit card companies spell out their conditions. Who's fault is it to sign up for the card without reading the fine print? Who's fault is it to sign without knowing the full extent of what your getting into?

YOURS. Not the bank's, not the lenders, not anyone's besides yours. No one forced you to sign without reading and understanding the terms.

People need to grow up and take responsibility for their actions. Be responsible! If you don't know, ask someone who does- it's not that hard. It's not the banks fault for turning a buck, it's yours for agreeing to the terms if you can't keep up.

Acts like this are just senseless and wasteful.

#4 american finance solutions

on February 23, 2010 at 11:53 p.m.

I have been searching for a website like this in the field I am interested in. I am a big fan. I was thinking about creating my own blog about similar ideas for like-minded people. Some good ideas here. Thanks, I can only hope mine turns out as good as this one
<a href="http://americanfinancesolutions.com/">American finance solution</a>

#5 Philip L

on February 28, 2010 at 11:41 p.m.

@Katie: To be honest, I did not read the fine print. Every month when the bill comes in the mail, there's a section that says "Pay in full amount" and guess what? That's what I pay -- and I have no debt! Fantastic, that if you add up your month's charges they come out to the "pay in full amount," and paying what you charged leads to no interest, no debt!

You would like banks to treat us like they would any other adult? Show me how they do so differently -- I see that they do, and it is on the consumer end to act the part of the adult.

It really isn't that hard Katie -- just pay what you charge.


Post a comment

Name:



Login to verify your name

Email:


Required, but not shown.

Comment: