The Daily of the University of Washington

Demanding discussion: Anti-Budget Cut Coalition demands forum from UW president


View this day's paper in PDF
Share

Yesterday, a small but energetic group of 10 people, collectively making up the UW’s Anti-Budget Cut (ABC) Coalition, gathered in Red Square.


Photo by Joel Shapiro.

Members of the Anti-Budget Cut (ABC) Coalition picket on Red Square yesterday to protest budget cuts.



Photo by Joel Shapiro.

Members of the ABC Coalition rallied in Red Square yesterday.


“Hey, hey. Ho, ho. These budget cuts have got to go,” the group members chanted in unison.

The coalition has been arguing against the UW’s proposal to increase tuition 14 percent each year for the next two years, which the university has been granted permission to do by the state Legislature.

“There are a number of different things we can do at the UW that won’t result in 14 percent tuition hikes,” said ABC Coalition member and graduate student Jessie Kindig. “There are things we can do that won’t result in thousands of layoffs and the closing of writing centers.”

The English Department Writing Center has already closed this year, and other centers are likely to close, while hundreds of teaching assistants have also been informed that they will no longer have jobs next year.

The ABC Coalition formed in December in response to Washington state Gov. Chris Gregoire’s budget proposal. The group set an initial goal of stopping budget cuts at the state level. But, after the state Legislature released its budget April 25, cutting $214 million from the UW’s budget, coalition members began to focus on how the UW administration will implement cuts. The university’s budget will be finalized in June.

Last week, the coalition hosted a forum with more than 30 UW faculty, staff and students, who discussed how budget cuts could affect them personally. Yesterday, along with picketing in Red Square, coalition members brought a letter addressed to UW President Mark Emmert to his office in Gerberding Hall.

The letter requested that Emmert hold a town hall meeting in Kane Hall during the week of May 18, at which speakers organized by the coalition could present alternatives to the university’s proposed cuts. The letter requested a response from Emmert by May 12.

“We want more dialogue and debate about what these cuts are going to mean,” said graduate student Grant Mandarino.

UW spokesperson Norm Arkans said the university has been communicating.

“There’s been a fair amount of communication,” Arkans said. “We know what our budget is, and we’re working to minimize the impacts.”

Arkans said there have already been town hall meetings held to address the issue, and Provost and Executive Vice President Phyllis Wise will be holding another forum Friday in the Faculty Club to address faculty and staff cuts.

In addition to their request for a community forum, the coalition also plans to attend the next Board of Regents meeting May 14 and is attempting to get on the board’s agenda.

Student regent Jean-Paul Willynck said that the Board of Regents encourages and welcomes a diverse range of student opinions; however, Willynck also encourages students to voice their concerns to their student-government representatives, who can then advise the Board of Regents about issues facing students.

“From what I know working with the regents is they’re certainly very welcoming to all student opinions,” Willynck said. “[But] at the Board of Regents level, we like to see a lot of the conversations come through the proper channels.”

Anttimo Bennett, president of ASUW, and Jake Faleschini, president of the Graduate and Professional Student Senate, advise the board about issues concerning students. David Lovell, chair of the Faculty Senate, brings faculty concerns to the board. The student regent has full voting power with the Board of Regents.

However, the coalition would like to see more students, faculty and staff become voting members of the board.

“One thing we’re asking is that we actually have democratic representation at the Board of Regents, and they’re not the only ones voting on the [university] budget proposal,” Kindig said. “Perhaps their ideas about what would benefit the university best doesn’t match with students, staff and faculty.”

Faleschini, who advises the Board of Regents on behalf of students, recognizes the hardships members of the UW community are facing as a result of the budget cuts. He encourages members of the coalition to bring their ideas and concerns to the board.

“I don’t know if it’s going to be particularly effective,” Faleschini said. “[But] these are extraordinary times, [and] people need to have an outlet and speak toward what is going on. If [the ABC Coalition] wants to do that at the regents meeting, it’s up to the regents to decide if they’d like to include that on the agenda.”

Reach reporter Eric Staples at news@dailyuw.com.


8 Comments

#1 Elizabeth F.
(UW Campus)

on May 6, 2009 at 9:41 a.m.
Report this comment

Three cheers for the ABC Coalition! The University's attempts at "mediating the cuts" have thus far meant a 30% tuition hike over two years, layoffs of staff and TAs and withering standard of education. The Coalition is thinking broadly and dynamically about alternatives on the university, state and national level. We need to start thinking about an income tax in WA state or cutting from the top. Emmert should be calling on Gov. Gregoire and Pres. Obama to fully fund all levels of education and end the war to pay for it. Keep going guys!

#2 ewb
(Seattle, WA)

on May 6, 2009 at 10:21 a.m.
Report this comment

I’m glad the ABC Coalition is out there opposing the current budget cuts plan and proposing alternatives. This is a much needed dialogue that is currently mute on campus. There are many sectors of our campus that don’t have an outlet to express how the cuts are hurting them and to offer alternatives, from the libraries to the custodial staff. I hope President Emmert agrees to the town hall meeting – we need alternatives!!!

#3 hakalo
(Seattle, WA)

on May 6, 2009 at 10:28 a.m.
Report this comment

For those interested, the ABC Coalition meets Thursdays at 6:00 in Parrington Hall, room 206. Come work with other students, staff, and faculty to help us organize alternatives to the devastating budget cuts proposal from the admin. Contact at abccoalitionuw@gmail.com

#4 Holland A.
(UW Campus | UW Community)

on May 6, 2009 at 3:07 p.m.
Report this comment

Not to condemn, but I read the article hopeful to see some realistic alternatives. I was disappointed to find none in the article, and only a comment in the article about ending the war to pay for education or instituting a WA state income tax. Both those ideas are unrealistic, as in war funding can't realistically end soon enough to help us by next year, plus that is federal funds. The income tax would be a huge endeavor, not to be taken lightly.

I am very against suspending laws to raise tuition and would love to hear alternatives, they just need to be realistic.

#5 Rachel
(UW Campus | UW Community)

on May 6, 2009 at 3:31 p.m.
Report this comment

Regarding income tax: A state income-tax bill was proposed during this past legislative session and failed to pass.

I would also like to hear some realistic alternatives from the ABC Coalition. They say they want alternative to tuition increases and cuts across campus, yet are unspecific about what exactly these alternatives are.

#6 hakalo
(Seattle, WA | UW Community)

on May 6, 2009 at 9:49 p.m.
Report this comment

Hey Holland and Rachel,
I think there are some viable alternatives we can pursue here at UW, and I've listed a few below. The ABC Coalition is also very open to suggestions from other sectors of campus. The alternatives listed below are very general. One of the goals of the ABC Coalition is to provide a space for other sectors/communities at UW to voice their own opinions on alternatives - so we are in no poisition to say that Deptartment X should do so and so. We are primarily focused on allowing Deparment X itself to come up with creative solutions itself that best serves its interests, and so far, the administration at UW has given very little space for such voices to be heard. That's why we are demanding that Pres. Emmert hold another Town Hall later this month where some of these alternatives that we know departments are capable of generating can be heard. That being said, here are a few suggestions:

1) Cut from administrative positions first. Emmert's salary alone could save the disability studies program, which is unsure if it will have the funding to have any classes at all next Fall.

2)Pull on funds from the self-funding athletics department to help close the budget gap.

3) Exhaust all existing discretional funds before raising tuition.

4) End private outside contracting for food, dorm services, tech support etc, and create jobs and save money by doing jobs in-house

5) Continue pressuring the state and federal government for more funds.

6)Involve students, staff, and faculty in the approval of the new budget plan, not just the unelected Board of Regents.

#7 Trevor G.
(Denver, CO | UW Community)

on May 7, 2009 at 9:14 a.m.
Report this comment

Proper Channels?

#8 John V.
(Redmond, WA | UW Community)

on May 9, 2009 at 12:17 p.m.
Report this comment

It is not clear to me that having Pres Emmert listen to hours of suggestions such as those listed in this article and comments, as proposed by ABC will help the budget situation. The specific plans mentioned in the article are "things we can do", "present alternatives", and "dialogue".

If he had not devoted an impressive effort to convincing the legislature to allow tuition raises, and tempered some legislative plans for bigger cuts, we would be seeing truly institution-threatening budget cuts, including the closures of entire departments and the crippling of many others.

Discussing alternatives and problems can't hurt, but disrupting of ongoing efforts to deal with current problems can.


Post a comment

Name:


(None, None | Unverified Name)
Login to verify your name

Email:


Required, but not shown.

Comment: