By
Rachel Solomon
April 15, 2009
With only 11 days left before the state budget is finalized in the Legislature, several hundred students rallied in Red Square and marched through campus yesterday in opposition to legislation that threatens to slash millions of dollars from the UW’s funding.
Photo by Jennifer Au.
Graduate student Afrose Ahmed cheers in response to the speech given by senior Veryl Pow about the increase of tuition rates.
Photo by Jennifer Au.
Students rally in Red Square April 14 in response to the possibility of a "tuition tax."
The rally addressed budget cuts and tuition hikes, but the main source of resentment among protestors was the possibility that a portion of students’ tuition money may be allocated into a general state fund.
“Every year, you pay a building fee,” GPSS President Jake Faleschini explained to the crowd. “The House budget proposes taking that fee and appropriating money for the general fund of the state of Washington. They are using you as a tax.”
The building fee Faleschini referred to is included in tuition costs.
University officials caught wind of this discrepancy in the state’s budget proposal about a week after it released at the beginning of the month.
After hearing about this “tuition tax” at a forum held by ASUW President Anttimo Bennett last Friday, junior Jason Padvorac and freshman Camilo Moreno-Salamanca decided to take action. The two created a Facebook event Saturday morning called Rally for the UW, hoping to give members of the UW community an opportunity to vocalize their frustration and displeasure, Padvorac said.
By Monday evening, the event had caught the interest of more than 10,000 students, administrators, faculty and staff. A few hundred were in attendance yesterday.
“I am filled with pride today,” said Moreno-Salamanca at the beginning of the rally. “Pride of a Husky nation that stands united … to send a clear message to legislators. That message is that higher education is not irrelevant nor unnecessary, and we will not stand for cost rises as classes get larger and the very people who educate us disappear.”
Democracy Insurgent member Veryl Pow emphasized the importance of acting now.
“Olympia, can you hear us?” Pow asked the crowd through a megaphone.
Democracy Insurgent, a social activism group on campus, is attempting to build a concrete movement in response to the decisions in Olympia, he said.
“There’s so little time left before they vote,” said sophomore Jamie Waldock. “Now is the time to spread the word and contact legislators.”
Waldock and her friend Sarah Round, who was also in attendance, plan to write letters to their legislators and are working to inspire others to follow suit.
Senior James Mellinger, however, found the rally ineffective.
“Students are basically about to have their tuition taxed, and what is our response? To sit in the sun listening to a group of people … yell into a blow horn,” Mellinger said. “What we need is to have massive numbers of students from every college in the state talking face-to-face with our elected officials in Olympia before the end of the legislative session.”
Despite varying perspectives about the rally, all speakers emphasized the value of higher education.
“You are an investment; you are not a cost,” said Ana Mari Cauce, dean of the College of Arts and Sciences. “We’ve got to go to Olympia and say, ‘We can take some cuts, but you need to invest in us because we are the future.’”
Reach reporter Rachel Solomon at news@dailyuw.com.
3 Comments
#1 Jason P.
on April 15, 2009 at 12:23 a.m.(Redmond, WA | UW Community)
James is right -- it is crucial for students to go to Olympia and talk with legislators face to face. The student governments on campus organize trips to do this (although there should be more).
Rallies are a necessary complement to these meetings because rallies (1) get at lawmakers when they watch the evening news, and (2) inspire students to take more action. We have to utilize as many different channels of advocacy as possible to be effective.
http://www.kirotv.com/education/19181...
http://www.komonews.com/news/43008027...
#2 ABC_Coalition
on April 15, 2009 at 8:59 a.m.(Seattle, WA | UW Community)
What is article fails to mention was the presence of the newly formed Anti-Budget Cuts Coalition at the rally yesterday. We are a group comprised of students, staff, faculty and UW community members committed to fighting the budget cuts and proposals for increased tuition at the UW. We are organizing a forum to take place later this month where all those most impacted by these cuts can discuss alternatives and how to mobilize to make sure cuts are not placed on the backs of students and staff. We have weekly meetings every Thursday in Parrington Hall, Room 206 at 6pm. Join us if you want to get more involved in this struggle.
#3 Rebecca_F
on April 20, 2009 at 10:44 a.m.(UW Campus | UW Community)
Maybe someone can clarify something for me . . . after reading the news article and watching the video of the protest, I'm still a little confused on the exact message . . . because there are several related, but none-the-less separate questions.
Was the protest intended as a statement against allocating tuition dollars into a general fund, raising tuition more than 7%, cutting state funding for the UW, or all-of-the-above??? I get the impression a lot of the students (perhaps all) involved would be passionate about all three issues. But it is certainly possible to be on one side of one issue and on the "other side" of another issue . . . e.g. to support raising tuition but not putting it into a general fund, for instance . . . or to support raising tuition to 14% but not lifting the cap altogether. There's more than two sides to the tuition/funding question(s) . . .
So anyway, my point was to ask if maybe someone involved in organizing the event or someone who knows more about the event if they can clarify what statement the event was intended to make? Is it to be assumed that attendees were supporting a specific position on all three issues, only one of the issues, or maybe different attendees were concerned about different issues? Was a specific agenda stated in whatever announcement was made prior to the event (I don't even have a Facebook account)? Will the agenda be the same for next Tuesday's event? (The print version of the Daily said there would be another rally tomorrow, although that announcement seems to be missing from the online version.) And who (or what organization) was in charge of this rally anyway? Was it ASUW-sponsored or more students working in their individual capacity? Or was there a centralized organization to it?
Post a comment