The Daily of the University of Washington

Prosecution presents in Amanda Knox trial


Although prosecutors have been presenting their case in the trial of former UW student Amanda Knox that began more than two months ago, the road to deciphering the truth has just begun.

Knox traveled to Perugia, Italy to study abroad in 2007. On Nov. 2 of that year, Knox’s British roommate, Meredith Kercher, was found murdered in their residence.

Knox and former boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, are now being tried for the crime. A third suspect, Rudy Guede, was convicted of murder last year and received a 30-year sentence.

Both Sollecito and Knox have denied wrongdoing in the case.

“Many of the witnesses heard so far have made mistakes that would normally show a witness to be unreliable,” said Knox’s friend and UW student DJ Johnsrud. “Many have contradicted either themselves or known information in very significant ways.”

The trial, which began in January, has focused on suspicions regarding Knox’s character and behavior after the murder. As witnesses have been questioned, testimonies that contradict known facts about the crime have presented an obstacle for the prosecution’s case.

“Other witnesses have provided testimony that, if true, would be very harmful to Amanda’s case, but for many of them, it took months to come forward,” Johnsrud said. “Additionally, some of these witnesses had done interviews with local media well before they [had] ever even talked to the police.”

The Italian court is held only two days a week and isn’t expected to reach a verdict until this fall.

In addition to longer trials, the Italian justice system gives defendants the right to contest information throughout the proceedings, which Knox has exercised in court.

“So far, the prosecution has not presented anything definitive that ties her to the crime,” Johnsrud said. “One would hope that if they’re going to take away 30 years of Amanda’s life, that they would have something a little more concrete than ‘strange’ behavior.”

Media coverage of the trial has been widespread, and the Internet has allowed some reporters to file stories before the conclusion of a day’s proceedings. The resulting coverage has not represented all testimonies and cross-examinations of the trial, Johnsrud said.

“Many of the reporters attending Amanda’s trial will leave early to get their report out,” said Johnsrud. “As a result, cross-examination of the witnesses so far has not been talked about very much in the media.”

Throughout the process, however, Knox’s supporters have remained hopeful.

“Both Amanda and everyone who supports her [have] been steadily gaining confidence in a favorable outcome from the trial,” Johnsrud said. “We’re growing more and more confident that she will be released.”

Reach editorial assistant Lexie Krell at news@dailyuw.com.


6 Comments

#1 Ballardemician
(UW Campus | UW Community)

on March 30, 2009 at 11:42 a.m.
Report this comment

Dear UW Daily Editorial Board,

Kudos on another brilliant bit of journalism, and no less on one of the most important stories this decade!

LOVED how nearly all of the information seems to be from a single expert source known as "friend of Amanda Knox." So innovative! A lesser newspaper might have also asked the opinion of, say, a neutral attorney familiar with the case. But your refusal to bow to the yoke of objectivity is, in a word, fairandbalanced. AM talk radio better watch its back!

#2 Harry R.
(Manchester, United Kingdom)

on March 30, 2009 at 1:21 p.m.
Report this comment

For anyone who is interested in the facts behind the media spin, and who cares to learn more about the victim of this terrible murder - Meredith Kercher - there is an excellent discussion board

http://perugiamurderfile.freeforums.o...

as well as an interesting blog

http://truejustice.org/ee/index.php

These online resources are not for profit. Anyone can read and/or participate and people from around the world do. They have followed this case since November 2007, and are in no way related to Amanda Knox. Nor are they her friends

#3 Kate S.
(Barry, United Kingdom)

on April 2, 2009 at 2:22 a.m.
Report this comment

I cannot agree this is good journalism, it is the opinions of a Knox supporter.

Good cross-examination? Railing at an elderly woman because she had left the making of a cup of chamomile tea out of her original statement to police? and still she was not discredited. lol

Find the most complete trial reports gathered at truejusticeformeredith.

#4 Harry R.
(None, United Kingdom)

on April 2, 2009 at 10:02 a.m.
Report this comment

There are two more excellent blogs that cover the Meredith Kercher case:

Lies Our Mothers Told Us

http://missrepresented.wordpress.com/

The Eclectic Chapbook

http://eclectchap.blogspot.com/

#5 nashd
(Bonney Lake, WA | UW Community)

on April 2, 2009 at 10:10 p.m.
Report this comment

This isn't a hard news angle on the trial by any means, but its not the atrocity that some of the other commentators have made it out to be.

While this could definitely have used an authoritative source (UW had some excellent law professors, last time I checked), the real problem was the framing of the story. Slap on a different headline and lede, move some of the trial history to later in the article, and all of a sudden you have a feature story, which is how this should have been presented.

#6 Ballardemician
(Denver, CO | UW Community)

on April 4, 2009 at 11:12 a.m.
Report this comment

so Nashd has a point -- this is really just a wrongly-structured, wrongly-titled, under-researched opinionated feature story. That it is presented as a hard news story, then, isn't much of problem and we should lighten up.

Nashd -- the next time you order a cheeseburger and get a bun filled with manure go ahead please keep in mind that really your meal is a fantastic fertilizer, and that if it has been packaged in a plastic bag and sold to you at a garden center you'd have nothing to complain about.

Obvious the British commenters have their biases too, but the Daily reportedly is a newspaper at a billion-dollar-a-year "research one" university and ought to feel an obligation to quality journalism and the highest ethical standards in their journalistic pratices.


Post a comment

Name:


(None, None | Unverified Name)
Login to verify your name

Email:


Required, but not shown.

Comment: