The Daily of the University of Washington

There’s no such thing as cruelty-free salad


View this day's paper in PDF
Share

Of all the foods with which I am acquainted, meats are not the “be all end all” of nutrition. While a juicy, charbroiled pepper-crusted steak or a thick slice of sausage and mushroom pizza certainly hits the spot, I am just as likely to salivate over a meat-free dinner of whole-wheat pasta with avocado chickpea salsa and broiled yam fries.

One of the girls I live with decided to try vegetarianism for the new year. And so far, it’s been a questionably successful affair — let’s just say, Thank [Your Deity] for pescetarianism (the inclusion of seafood in a vegetarian diet despite mercury levels).

Really, though, I support her, and I have followed her lifestyle choice quite a bit. Taking nutrition classes altered my perspective on red meat, and an upbringing with emphasis on healthful food choices has given me a broad appreciation for vegetables, fruits, whole grains and all of that other “health food” stuff.

Here’s why I don’t go vegetarian, though: I like meat. While I work to limit my meat intake and lean towards pescetarianism, I focus my nutrition on a well-balanced plant-based foundation. When I want an amazing steak or burger, I have one. My lifestyle choices don’t make me feel like I have to substitute the food I want with the food I feel obligated to eat.

I respect a wide range of lifestyle choices, but want to point out something: when vegetarians claim their diet is cruelty-free, I cannot believe how they overlook the feelings and rights of the plant life they devour. I consider eating part of the necessary enrollment in the Circle of Life, and I acknowledge that someday, I might get devoured by a cougar or other large cat. And I hope I bear the wretched feline no grudge, as I myself have devoured a great deal of flora and fauna in my own efforts at prolonged and continuing existence.

Who can claim that a cabbage undergoing the guillotine for coleslaw doesn’t suffer? Science aside, what proof is there that our vegetative food is treated any more humanely than those tragic tortured animals?

Fruit is grown in densely planted fields. Vegetables are choked under a haze of pesticides and fertilizers. Tofu is made to labor in sweatshops without light or clean water.

Actually, I made that up. Tofu isn’t made to work at all — it’s confined to tiny plastic tubs where it stays pale and tender (think of it as veal, but made of soy.)

So much of our vegetative food recalls the monstrosities of the poultry industry. All of those stories and horrific images conjured in the meat industry are overlooked where they pertain to our leafy friends trapped in greenhouses and dense orchards.

I know plants don’t have the nerves biologists find in animals, but there was a time when we didn’t think that critters or even babies felt pain. How do we know that plants don’t have these feelings too? They like classical music and communicate with one another using chemical signals — how on earth can they be said to not deserve the respect we give animals by swearing off consumption of the moving living things?

While my numerous houseplants listen to more Snow Patrol, Muse and Dandy Warhols than Mozart, I can’t imagine the horrors they witness every time I serve a vegetarian dinner. To save them this indignity, I’ve actually entertained the notion of draping tablecloths over them so they can’t see what we’re eating.

Now, you may think I’m crazy. I’m a proud omnivore but don’t eat much meat. I believe that cruelty is the same whether it’s a bag of carrot sticks or beef jerky I tuck into my messenger bag for a mid-class snack. Either way, I couldn’t possibly color my lifestyle choices based on how cruel or compassionate I think I’m being — life is life, no matter what sort, and who are we to claim that eating a cow is bad while eating almonds is good? (Eating almonds is good, by the way.)

Just eat the food you like and realize that everything eats something else; you might very well be eaten by a large cat tomorrow — so you may as well eat one of them today. Or rather, eat trout, pork or cow. Don’t eat cats.

Reach columnist Matt Jackson at opinion@dailyuw.com.


4 Comments

#1 Russ W.
(Redmond, WA)

on February 18, 2009 at 2:53 a.m.
Report this comment

But what's worse about eating cats than eating trout?

#2 Sarah R.
(Seattle, WA | UW Community)

on February 18, 2009 at 6:24 a.m.
Report this comment

I know this article is suppose to be humorous, but the last comment does have some culturally biased, and perhaps racist connotations that should be acknowledged.

In our culture, cats are pets and not eating them seems to be a big duh, but in south east Asia and some of the southern provinces of China cats are commonly eaten. Mr. Jackson has totally dismissed any appeals to animals' ability to feel pain, leaving us with human utility and desire as the standard for defining how we should treat animals. The difference between Westerners (or even Chinese in Northern provinces who keep cats as pets rather than food) is purely cultural. By asserting that one shouldn't eat cats one is saying that one cultural value is superior to another. I find this highly problematic.

I also find the supposedly humorous suggestion of a tofu sweat factory in bad taste considering that actual slaughter houses in the U.S. really do present a lot of human rights violations. Check out this article to see what I mean: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2... .

What use to be a good, unionized job has turned into one of the most dangerous jobs in the country. By using illegal immigrant labor meat packing companies can avoid paying workers comp. when someone loses a finger-- or arm. In fact they can just fire them and be done with it, illegal immigrants have little recourse. If workers attempt to unionize and demand better working conditions they are threatened with deportation.

Finally, if someone where really concerned that pants could feel pain, wouldn't they opt to eat lower on the food chain (vegetarianism) to decrease their net consumption of plants?

I just don't think it's funny to make light of such egregious human rights violations going on in our own country. It's a huge error to believe that eating meat is a purely personal choice that doesn't effect other people.

#3 Sarah R.
(UW Campus | UW Community)

on February 18, 2009 at 7:52 a.m.
Report this comment

The Mother Jones article is a little ld, here's some other's about the meat packing industry:

http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2005/01/24...

http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/250/meat... .

Like I said, Tofu seat shop seems funny now, but the reality of the slaughter house worker abuse is very real.

#4 Randall F.
(Seattle, WA | UW Community)

on February 18, 2009 at 2:30 p.m.
Report this comment

@ Sarah R.:

You said: "illegal immigrants have little recourse. If workers attempt to unionize and demand better working conditions they are threatened with deportation."

Well...yeah. They're illegal. If they try to utilize union rights, which they don't have, they get threatened with deportation, which is the legal way of dealing with them anyway. They shouldn't have the jobs in the first place; the fact that they do is what is actually wrong with the industry.


Post a comment

Name:


(None, None | Unverified Name)
Login to verify your name

Email:


Required, but not shown.

Comment: