By
Gavin Verhey
November 23, 2009
UW business graduate Alonso Chehade is stuck in a red-tape limbo.
The 22-year-old UW alumnus is just like you. Hardworking. Talented. Looking for a stable job. There’s just one detail that separates Chehade from everyone else: He immigrated to the United States from Peru without documentation when he was 14.
Now, Chehade faces deportation despite having lived in the United States for eight years.
He was originally set to be deported a week ago, but a 50-day extension negotiated by Sen. Maria Cantwell has provided Chehade extra time to campaign.
The former UW business student spent the last seven months putting his marketing skills to a test — worth far more points than any midterm or final. By creatively using his marketing knowledge to build a platform for the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act (DREAM Act), he has placed himself on the cusp of achieving his goal.
Considering the significance of Chehade’s situation, we should all hope he succeeds.
Some stand firmly opposed to people illegally immigrating to the United States. Understandable. Allowing people into the country sans documentation has the potential to cause countless security issues, reduce job opportunities, and drain government resources. Chehade is not causing any of those problems.
Throughout his eight-year run in the United States, not a single security issue cropped up that identified Chehade or his family as an illegal immigrant. He graduated with honors in high school and put himself through the arduous UW business program by running his own business. Today, his business finesse can be seen in motion with his movement to stay in the country.
If anything, Chehade has the potential to create jobs, not take them away.
Deporting a valuable member of our society simply so that our government can say they followed immigration policy is a thoroughly asinine concept.
Policies are in place so that situational rules can be established and regulated. While rules are structurally important to our country’s longevity, exceptions should be made in instances where rules are being followed for the sake of following rules.
Chehade’s situation is one such example.
When the primary argument — to disconnect a man from his family, the country he knows, and the city he is familiar with — is that he didn’t originate from the United States, it prompts the question, “Why does his origin matter?”
The answer is it shouldn’t.
Seattle is Chehade’s home. He has spent the most important academic years of his life in our renowned city and has built himself around the surroundings we mutually cherish.
He is as much a Northwesterner as any of us. We’re just too ethnocentric to admit it.
Other undocumented immigrants like Chehade undoubtedly attend our university. They sent in the same application as we did, they take the same classes as we do, and they all deserve a chance to pursue their dreams like we can.
Hopefully, Chehade’s actions will cause Congress to pass the DREAM Act and create a shining future for undocumented immigrants.
It would be a shame if Chehade wasn’t around in Seattle to see it happen.
Reach columnist Gavin Verhey at opinion@dailyuw.com.
10 Comments
#1 WTF
on November 23, 2009 at 8:26 a.m.(UW Campus | Unverified Name)
Heres a reason that he should go home (Peru). When he was admitted to the UW he took away a slot that should have went to a legal resident or citizen.
Since we are deciding which laws we want to follow, I decare that I will stop paying my taxes until Alonso is deported. Sound stupid? yes it is and that is the logic that you are using in this asinine arguement that he should stay.
What about all those people that he cut in front of in the immigration process, don't they deserve to be here just as much as him (or even more). It is because of people like Alonso that it is harder for the good people to immigrate properly.
#2 Dylan
on November 23, 2009 at 1:53 p.m.(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name | UW Community)
It's not that Alonso is a bad person, it's that there is no reason to bend the rules for him.
There's a reason that none of the mainstream news agencies have picked up this story. Because there is no injustice here. Do you know how many "good" people have been deported in a similar situation, here or elsewhere? I am libertarian, if anything, so I don't really like immigration laws myself. However, if you're going to get in this argument you certainly can't say that we should start making exceptions or change immigration policy for people who don't follow the rules but are under 18 when they move here.
I'm really surprised to see this fourth article regarding Alonso, I guess it keeps me coming back, though...
#3 Kevin
on November 23, 2009 at 6:23 p.m.(UW Campus | Unverified Name | UW Community)
Doesn't matter one bit if he's a good person or not. Laws are laws. If you don't follow them then there are consequences. Alonso needs to go back to Peru.
#4 Anonymous
on November 23, 2009 at 6:58 p.m.(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name | UW Community)
So let me get this straight. If today was 1965 and the Jim Crow laws prevented me from entering a bathroom that was labeled "White Only" then I should be sent to jail? Would you enforce those laws today?
I'm not trying to say that laws are stupid. They are an important part of our society and they should be respected.
I just want us to take a closer look at the current laws and see if they reflect the needs of our society. Just like the Jim Crow laws would not be acceptable in today's society we need to take a closer look at our current immigration laws. Both Republicans and Democrats agree that our immigration system is broken, which is why many individuals are in situations like Alonso's. Instead of blaming the individual for trying to achieve the American Dream, we should have a deeper discussion on how to make our border more secure and allow individuals like Alonso to have an opportunity to get in line.
With our current immigration system he doesn't even have the opportunity to get "in line". We need him and others like him. That is why I am 100% behind the passage of the D.R.E.A.M. Act.
#5 The Black Spit
on November 23, 2009 at 8:40 p.m.(Location Unknown | Unverified Name)
Its easy for all those ignorant of immigration laws to say...well Alonso, go back to Peru. What a mistake. This individual is AMERICANIZED already. A role model of our society an you want to kick him out?
There is NOT A SINGLE path to legal residency under the current immigration law. We need to be smart as a Nation and keep these smart people among us. No wonder America has lost its edge of competitiveness in the world. We reward mediocrity and not excellence.
#6 The Black Spit
on November 23, 2009 at 8:41 p.m.(Location Unknown | Unverified Name)
Hey "Dylan"...afraid that Alonso might end up as our boss one day? LOL
#7 Go Home, Obey the law
on November 23, 2009 at 10:17 p.m.(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)
Jim Crow laws and Alonso situation are not even equatable. There was moral injusice with Jim Crow, with Alonso he has been treated more then fairly by being allowed to stay here in this country for as long as he has. The immigration laws are not unjust, they are just outdated for the volume of today.
The immigration laws are antiquated, but they are fair to those that follow them. Alonso's parents made a mistake as did Alonso by deciding to enroll in college at the UW.
There is a reason that there isn't a path to citizenship for illegals, it is because they broke the law and forfeited that right.
#8 eh
on November 25, 2009 at 12:23 p.m.(Olympia, WA | Unverified Name)
"When he was admitted to the UW he took away a slot that should have went to a legal resident or citizen." Yeah, ok, legal residents and citizens take admission for granted. And no, your tax dollars did not help him at all. He could not get any type of financial aid. He faced larger obstacles than any college student ever should face and yet you idiots scold him for putting forth that effort. Why are you trying to get rid of the good people? There are far worse criminals that are legal and are citizens, but you guys aren't complaining about that. How ironic!
#9 Adan N.
on December 3, 2009 at 4:31 p.m.(UW Campus | UW Community)
I find the first three and seventh comments repulsively draconian and ignorant of American immigration policy. Who are those people, right wingers who can only frame things in black and white?
Our current immigration policy is impractical, destroys families, and has been unsustainable for too long. Most of it is founded on ungrounded paranoia of foreigners and foreign labor, and serves to protect the interests of specific interest groups.
I feel bad for Alonso, but I'm impressed, amazed, and motivated at his resolve in light of his situation.
#10 Ali
on February 17, 2010 at 5:40 a.m.(Temple Hills, MD | Unverified Name)
"When the primary argument — to disconnect a man from his family, the country he knows, and the city he is familiar with — is that he didn’t originate from the United States, it prompts the question, “Why does his origin matter?"
--------
And yet, Mr. Chehade did just that--disconnect himself from the life he knew in Peru to come here illegally. Fact is, his "origin" doesn't matter. What DOES matter is how one comes here: legally or not. THAT says a lot about a person's character. A dishonest person is a dishonest person, particularly when they are dishonest on a daily basis as illegal aliens are.
Post a comment