By
Andrew Doughman
October 1, 2009
Lyndon LaRouche advocates set up a table on campus yesterday with posters bearing photographs of President Barack Obama with an edited-in, Adolf-Hitler-style moustache. While other students and staff browsed the Dawg Daze booths, some people were busy raising their voices because of the display.
Photo by Kyle Scholzen.
Members of the LaRouche group hand out pamphlets with a defaced President Obama on the cover. These depictions of the president upset many people who saw them.
“What do you think of Obama?” one LaRouche supporter asked people passing by the stand between Mary Gates Hall and Red Square. “He’s kissing too much booty. What do you think of the mustache?”
Santiago Vega, a passing community member, said the display angered him, but he said that it is tricky to define the group’s display as either hate speech or speech protected by the First Amendment.
“They push it up to the line, but they don’t go over it,” he said. “They’re on the precipice.”
The LaRouche group distributed pamphlets that drew a link between Obama’s policies and Hitler’s policies on euthanasia.
“Obviously, they have no sense of history,” Vega said. “It’s incredible, the abject stupidity.”
Henry Gasparian, an Armenian immigrant who lived through a Nazi occupation, was charged with assault after a fight with LaRouche supporters in Edmonds Sept. 5.
“I would almost say this is an incitement to violence,” said Jeff Ostrove, a UW sophomore who saw the display on campus yesterday.
LaRouche supporters have campaigned on campus for years, handing out pamphlets and engaging in political debates with passers-by. Members of the perennial presidential candidate’s national party do not talk to the press as a rule and declined to comment for this story.
LaRouche, who first ran for U.S. president in 1976, has a long political history. He has, at various times, been called the leader of a political cult, a communist, a racist and an anti-Semite. Although the majority of his presidential campaigns seek a Democratic nomination, the Democratic Party has never recognized LaRouche.
Reach reporter Andrew Doughman at news@dailyuw.com.
4 Comments
#1 John H.
on October 1, 2009 at 1:03 p.m.(UW Campus)
I may not agree with everything the president does, but he at least deserves respect. He's sticking out his neck BIG TIME for the rest of the country.
Their message is not only absurd, it's disrespectful.
#2 Rebecca_F
on October 4, 2009 at 5:47 p.m.(Denver, CO | UW Community)
The flier (or at least picture) sounds like Free Speech. In poor taste. Certainly not respectful. But you have the right to be rude. Really. Respect per se isn't a right and isn't protected by the Constitution. At least, it's not a right in the way that life is a right or in the way that free speech is a right.
As for incitement, there is no indication in this article that they asked, let along caused, anyone to commit a crime. Now if the flier contained threatening remarks about the president or directed readers to commit a crime . . . that's another story and could be illegal. I haven't personally read the flier, so I can't really speak to that.
The interviewee who expressed concern about incitement may have been confusing incitement with "fighting words". Personally, I don't think the picture itself would be considered "fighting words", but if they were heckling passersby with provocative comments you might be able to build a case . . . not that I'd be in any hurry to support that case.
#3 Schmo
on October 16, 2009 at 5:55 p.m.(None, None | Unverified Name)
While I personally wouldn't hold a sign portraying our president with a Hitler-like toothbrush mustache, it is not un-american to make the policy comparison in the health care debate. People can "go there" with their arguments in a policy debate. It's perfectly acceptable. And their have been times in our history when I believe it would have been acceptable. Andrew Jackson treated the Cherokee much the same way Hitler treated the Jews, but i don't believe the Larouche PAC people are even making a comparison like that. They are comparing a particular policy of Obamas to a particular policy of Hitlers. Whether they are correct in the comparison or not should be the content of your article. That would be the responsible retort, yours is, well, yout whining about agitated feelings and an uncomfortable tension created by the existence of the dissent. Your article is crap.
#4 KM
on October 27, 2009 at 2:53 p.m.(None, None | Unverified Name)
I ran into these people on my campus today as well. I checked first to make sure they had the right to be out there (don't you need a permit?), then one of them got upset for me reporting them and they took a picture of me. I was very upset. Luckily I have a family member who is a cop and they said nothing should come of it, but to keep them informed if it does.
Post a comment