By
Jackson Rohrbaugh
April 8, 2008
Spring has sprung, and our campus is transforming in a myriad of ways. The cherry blossoms on the Quad lawn are a spectacular sight, but the real wonder lies in the rapidly blossoming females of UW. I don’t know what switch is flipped and who flips it, but once it’s turned on, there are magical fillies prancing about everywhere.
Do all girls get a collective memo in mid-April that tells them to dress for attention? I’m getting whiplash from double takes. Every time I walk past a flock of preening beauties that have just shed their winter coats, I pull a neck muscle. Do you know what you are doing to us, girls? Your unleashed skin, gallant strutting and clever makeup is causing more distraction than LaRouche at the UW. However, being sidetracked by a woman with glistening hair is better than reading an angry leaflet.
The squirrels have caught the pheromone bug as well. They can be seen on every lawn and park, chasing one another with burning loins. Any bush, branch or bench will suffice for a quick rendezvous. In that way, squirrels are like Parisians: They possess little shame about public intimacy. I wonder if the squirrel population has been reading discarded copies of The Stranger’s Casual Encounters section.
I contend that guys aren’t that different than squirrels. Every spring, it’s like adolescence; all of a sudden we notice that girls exist and we feel super awkward about it. We chase, we hide and we furtively make plans to attract them. It’s partially the faint scent of flowers everywhere, and partially the sun, but it feels like our campus is bathed in pheromones. Short of donning a gas mask and diving for the nearest trench, there’s not much we guys can do to escape the hormones that spring has bombarded our campus with.
So, like our furry friends, we chase. Our day-to-day food gathering and studying has been interrupted by mating season. Girls, you owe us one. We didn’t complain all throughout winter when your glory was covered up by sweats, long jackets and Uggs. Now, we can see your ankles and shoulders — if not more — and it’s hard to focus in class, let alone talk to you. Throw us a bone, and forgive us if we stutter.
However, don’t stand for us ogling you. You have a right to fair treatment, without creeps gazing at your curves. Do your part and don’t throw breasts, legs and thighs at us like we’re KFC party buckets. It’s confusing and sends mixed messages. If you aren’t intending to be eyed like a piece of meat, show some modesty and pick one asset to display instead of as many as you can. We’re trying to learn here.
I say all this because it is difficult to be a male in this culture and appreciate females for more than their bodies. Let me explain. Almost every media outlet is trying to sell us something using female body parts. Magazine covers and commercials bombard us with cleavage until we are desensitized and cheapen our innate appreciation of female beauty. The cleavage-laden covers of women’s magazines certainly don’t help either. The Internet, which offers carnal jollies with a few mouse clicks, has done much to objectify women.
Guys don’t need much help from you visually. Most of the work is done for us by beer advertisements and racy movies marketed to college students. When a girl has enough self-admiration to keep herself reasonably well covered, it speaks volumes to men who are used to no effort when it comes to visual gratification. We actually have to treat you like you have a personality and deserve respect. Demand respect from us. But the more you show us, the more our thinking shifts to the smaller of our two heads. It is a sad truth, but men don’t have a lot of natural discernment.
Am I advocating that everyone walk around in homespun gowns or burqas? No. Each person’s standards of what is respectful and appropriate are different. Plus, it’s getting warmer out, and you can’t be expected to remain in sweaters for the rest of the summer. Just know that our judgment is obscured when we see abundant skin.
Spring is filled with gorgeous sights: blossoms in the Quad, melting snow on the Cascades, girls basking in sunlight and unicorns leaping through the arboretum. It’s an opportunity to meet a lot of new people, since everyone is in good humor. But meet the people, not their bodies, and spring will be even more meaningful.
[Reach reporter Jackson Rohrbaugh at opinion@thedaily.washington.edu.]
7 Comments
#1 Bee
on April 7, 2008 at 10:29 p.m.(Yakima, WA | Unverified Name)
This article was very well written and entertaining, and dare i say slightly informative!
#2 no way
on April 8, 2008 at 4:19 p.m.(UW Campus | Unverified Name)
what the hell are you talking about?
#3 Joe B
on April 8, 2008 at 4:50 p.m.(Gig Harbor, WA | Unverified Name)
For an old guy, reading your article was not only enjoyable, but took me back to the days when I had the time and environment to look around, and my prescription medication didn't interfere with natural processes. Whoever wrote the comment above "What the hell are you talking about?" is either in the mid stages of alzheimers, or else he's the guy in Bend, Oregon who is pregnant and testosterone deficient. Remember God created woman because man wanted something more than fellowship with...oh just the CREATOR OF THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE! Man, ho hum with God, but drooling over the newly disigned model called woman. It goes back to the very beginning.
#4 Camp
on April 8, 2008 at 10:01 p.m.(UW Campus | Unverified Name)
Well written as usual, Jackson. I have to say, though, that any male that blatantly looks over a female in a lewd fashion needs to watch more Seinfeld. Remember, children! It's like looking at the Sun; you only go for a glimpse, or you risk permanent damage.
#5 Deelia
on April 9, 2008 at 5:36 p.m.(Kirkland, WA | Unverified Name)
I especially liked the comparisons to squirrels and the KFC metaphor.
#6 sam
on April 9, 2008 at 11:18 p.m.(New York, NY | Unverified Name)
first i should say, Well written and funny. your writing style is very entertaining and you write a convincing argument.
however, i think that's a little unfair to be putting so much on women's clothing. men will be men. let's do a little thought experiment here and think about if all women were to take your advice and the men said yea or ney on what was "too racy" or distracting and they demeaned what was appropriate to their own personal moral compass. oh wait. this already happens now. let's look at places where the men act as the moral (and fashion) police over the women and force them to cover up to the extreme (to be fair, many women are active in accepting this style of "modesty"). Can we say that by doing this we can see a direct link to the way they respect women? the answer is yes. and unfortunately it doesn't help your argument, the link is that in these places women are generally thought to be oppressed. You're saying not to walk around in "homespuns and Burqas" but yet here you are writing articles as a man telling women what's ok and not ok to wear and giving men an excuse for their "obscured judgment".
I end with another example. There was an article written in a famous British magazine around the time the waltz was emerging as a new dance form. The article claimed that the waltz would be the end of British civilization due to being extremely racy and provocative for men and women were dancing way too close and touching! Of course this could only lead to downfall! Yes, we're talking about the waltz you're thinking of, the old-time dance style. I think this example speaks for itself in reference to your article and what is considered "racy".
#7 MoD-S-tY
on April 12, 2008 at 5:35 p.m.(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)
First and foremost, I would like to comment the author on an article well written. Being a proud Muslim woman, I found my self unable to believe the statements I was reading in this article because Jackson was basicaly describing the rational behind why Muslim women cover. As intellectual college students, I would like to challenge any UW student (willing to take the challenge) to find out why Muslim women cover, and you will be appauled that the explanation lines up exactly with what Jackson is stating.
It is my understanding that many Westerners view Muslim women to be oppressed, asking questions such as "Its summertime...why are you wearing that covering?". What many fail to understand is that Islam as a way of life means submission. Its not subordination, its submission. Submitting to the commandment of the One Supreme Lord who is worthy of worship and and depend upon none. Does not the Creator know what is best for His creation? And it is for these exact necesities of modestly as mentioned by Jackson that the covering (hijab) has been ordained by the Creator for women.
I ask of you to ask yourselves one question: for all the precious TREASTURES that you own (i.e. gold, diamond, exc..) why do you keep them away from the reach of strangers, stored in a safe place? If you can venture to ask your selves this question and to think about Islam, then maybe we'll be heading to an understanding. Not the understanding about Islam as stated by CNN, MSNBC or any political pundit, but one based on rational.
Post a comment