By
Aditya Ganapathiraju
March 10, 2008
Kosovo, a small territory where primarily ethnic Albanians reside, announced its independence from Serbia last month. While Western leaders have celebrated this unilateral secession as a great moment for democracy, the actual details of the secession paint a different picture.
In 1999, the United States led NATO in bombing the former Yugoslavia under the pretense of preventing Serbian aggression against Kosovar Albanians. Former president of Serbia, Slobodan Milosevic, whom the United States once supported, played a key role in the aggression.
While bombing was said to be essential to prevent genocide, in 2005 senior Clinton official John Norris wrote differently in his novel Collision Course.
“It was Yugoslavia’s resistance to the broader trends of political and economic reform — not the plight of the Kosovar Albanians — that best explains NATO’s war,” he wrote.
Bill Richardson, Clinton’s secretary of energy, also brought up underlying reasons for the bombing.
“This is about America’s energy security,” he said months after the bombing.
At the time, the U.N. Security Council passed resolution 1244, which guaranteed a commitment of all member states to the “sovereignty and territorial integrity” of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.
Serbian and Russian political officials have said Kosovo’s declaration of independence was in gross violation of 1244 and a breach of international law, while the United States asserts that Kosovo’s independence was fully consistent with 1244, said Zalmay Khalilzad, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, in a security council press release.
“I’m very torn,” said Stephen Zunes, a UC San Francisco professor of international studies, in an interview with therealnews.com. “I have supported the Kosovo Albanians’ struggle for self-determination for quite a few years now, and yet … the nature of the current Kosovo-Albanian leadership and the hypocrisy and double standards of the United States and other Western powers makes this a time that should be one of celebration to one of, frankly, great apprehension.”
Zunes and others point to the hypocrisy of Western powers in supporting Kosovo’s right to secede but ignoring other regions with similar aspirations, like Tibet, Western Sahara, the Basque country in Spain, Kashmir, Taiwan, Palestine and Kurdistan.
Asia Times columnist Pepe Escobar said to look at Camp Bondsteel and the Albanian Macedonian Bulgarian Oil Corp. (AMBO) for answers as to why the United States is interested in Kosovo’s independence.
The $1.1 billion AMBO pipeline will take oil from the Caspian Sea, bypassing the heavily trafficked Aegean and Mediterranean seas and routing it through Macedonia to the U.S.-friendly Albanian port of Vlora, ultimately taking the oil to refineries in the United States for significantly less cost than it now incurs.
Camp Bondsteel will serve to provide “security” in the region, defending critical pipeline areas while also serving as “a sort of smaller — and friendlier — five-star Guantanamo, with perks like Thai massage and loads of junk food,” Escobar said.
Kosovo’s independence may have little to do with its autonomy. Officials in Brussels have confirmed that thousands of EU bureaucrats will be sent to the nation-state to form another “EU (and NATO) protectorate,” Escobar wrote.
Meanwhile, Iraqi Kurdistan has been denied its independence. Turkey officials are furious at the precedent Kosovo has set and invaded Northern Iraq with 10,000 troops to show the world that Kurdish secession is not an option.
“An array of European analysts, not to mention Russians, has compared the current, dangerous state of play in the Balkans to Sarajevo in 1914 that led to the outbreak of World War II,” Escobar wrote.
[Reach columnist Aditya Ganapathiraju at news@thedaily.washington.edu.]


90 Comments
#1 Concerned American
on March 10, 2008 at 1:04 a.m.(Malvern, PA | Unverified Name)
"Turkey officials are furious at the precedent Kosovo has set and invaded Northern Iraq with 10,000 troops to show the world that Kurdish secession is not an option."
Hmmm...well it looks like the author of this post has already made up his mind and has called the independence of Kosovo a precedent. Let that sink in gentlemen. From now on, independence is an option. Just makes you wonder how all these countries on our world mustered to such sovereignty they enjoy today.
Furthermore, the hypocrisy of such analysis intentionally omits the fact that these "furious" Turkish officials are so angered by this Kosovo precedent, that they were among the first the second day after independence to recognize it. Ahhh the double standards - it just makes you wonder how some countries are bigger than others.
Regardless, even though given the fact that UNSC Res. 1244 envisaged an ultimately FINAL (take note) settlement of Kosovo's status in accordance with the wishes of its people, self-determination, I guess, can be recognized when it is in concert with a democratic superpower, a powerful supranational organization, and behind it with a history full of justification.
The barks of a nostalgic state with its own (quite clear) personal oil interests in Europe cannot imprison a people into a status quo of limbo. While Russia is cashing on Serbian fears (buying their national oil giant for pennies) and consolidating its energy diplomacy by making an example of Ukraine, this Aditya "columnist" thinks the US is doing it just because of some oil pipeline thought up since 1986 but not even implemented yet. Go figure.
I suggest you try a bit harder.
#2 Macedon
on March 10, 2008 at 3:27 a.m.(Skopje, Macedonia | Unverified Name)
I wonder, can we Macedonians, start similar insurgency in Bulgarian south-west province where majority of population are Macedonians and also in North Greece, where majority are Macedonians too?
Probably NO because those 2 countries are members of EU, despite fact that this 2 countries do not have a standards for ethnic minority's and have fake democracy.
All this matter with Kosovo is solving one problem, but opens a dozen new...
#3 james
on March 10, 2008 at 3:53 a.m.(Mississauga, Canada | Unverified Name)
Very well written!! Bravo! A lot hangs no this manufactured independence. Oil interests as well as others.
Are the EU and US now powerful enough and capable of manufacturing countries out of thin air? Yes, thin air! there is absolutely no grounds for the creation of a yet 2nd Albanian country in Europe or creation a country out of Kosovo. It was not a kingdom, a peoples, or a civilization of anykind. It was actually an Ottoman valleyvet whose borders looked very very different than they do today.
The only grounds for creation a country out of it are oil and the images from the Kosovo war in the 90's. Does this mean that we will continue to see new countries created out of thin air based on war images and public opinion? At what point or circumstances to turn away from multi-ethnicity and multi-cultural and trying to diplomatically urge people find peaceful ways of living together within their borders and move on to separating and creating countries based on internal disputes? At what point to we say, multi-ethnicity and multi-culturalism is not in the best interests of these people and they have to build borders and barriers and separate themselves from one another.
Lastly, has anyone asked, at there divisions and disputes within the Albanian peoples? Are we going to solve them by further dividing up Kosovo and Albania?
#4 dissident
on March 10, 2008 at 6:24 a.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
To concerned American: Your and NATO's case of Kosovo: “Self-determination” as an instrument of imperialist policy.
Control of the Balkans is of great strategic importance for both the US and the European powers, and the prerequisite for this control is the dissolution of Yugoslavia, which has now been completed with the secession of Kosovo.
The US maintains one of its largest military bases on European soil in Kosovo—Camp Bondsteel, near Urosevac. Camp Bondsteel also serves as a base for so-called “renditions,” involving the kidnapping and torture of alleged terror suspects. Washington’s military bases in the Balkans and Eastern Europe are part of the US strategy to encircle Russia by penetrating the former spheres of influence of the Soviet Union. At the same time, they serve to reinforce American influence in Europe.
The European powers, and above all Germany, also regard their intervention in the Balkans as crucial for enhancing their weight in Europe. The fact that the US is able to play such a leading role in Europe’s “back yard” is regarded by the European media as painful proof of the continent’s impotence.
Kosovo and the Balkans as a whole constitute an important access route to the Black Sea and the energy supplies of the Caspian Basin. There is currently a range of plans for competing gas and oil pipelines in which Kosovo plays an important role. Kosovo also has its own reserves of gold, lead, tin and brown coal.
In the ruthless pursuit of their own interests, the US and EU powers have swept aside basic elements of international law.That everyone in America does not see this for what it really is, is indicative of the overwhelming “brainwashing” of the American citizenry.
Self-determination you claim! As if!Kosovar Albanians argue that they should have this land because it is their home of which 95% are non-Serbian. One who knows anything about history needs to ask a simple question? How do they explain the Serbian heartland became so dominant of ethnic Albanians? If they want their own land, why don't they go to Albania-afterall this is where their alleged ancestors are?
To all of you I pose this question..Which none of you can answer.. If Serbs are truly so unjust to minorities, if they are truly so evil and so genocidal. Then why is Serbia, BY FAR the most ethnically diverse country in the Balkans. All the other nations are "pure". Serbia is the only place where they live in harmony. Think about this VERY HARD. If Serbs truly wanted to cleanse Serbia of Albanians, why didn't they start with the 100,000 Albanians living in Belgrade? Or the over 500,000 living in other parts of Serbis? No amount of propaganda can answer these questions can it... Why do you think it is so easy to cut up the country? May be because it is'n yours? Still you can't block the Sun and you can't kill the truth.
#5 FactsFinder
on March 10, 2008 at 6:27 a.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
Kosovo has always been an important part of Serbia and it will remain so. The fact that Kosovo is populated mostly with ethnic Albanians is irrelevant. There is no basis for ethnic minorities to declare “independence” under international law. If there were, then it would also be legal for ethnic Mexicans or American Indians to declare their "independence" from the US and then asked other countries to recognize them. But under international law any such declarations would be illegal. If another country “recognized” such a declaration, and then tried to impose changes on US borders, it would be rightly construed by the US as an act of aggression.
It is not legal to change the borders of countries and create new countries inside existing countries just because it suits you. If it were otherwise, then that would turn the whole post-World War 2 political system upside down and open Pandora’s Box. There are would-be breakaway regions everywhere in the world. The breakaway regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, in post-Soviet Georgia are actively seeking Russian recognition of their “independence” too. Why should Russia now act with restraint in the space where it is capable of acting unilaterally to change national borders, and where there is little that NATO or the US could do about it presently?
By encouraging the Kosovar Albanians to declare independence, and then immediately "recognizing" that independence, the United States acted contrary to international law. This was a cynical act by the Americans in pursuit of US geo-political interests. The US hasn't put forward a single legal justification for this act, other than essentially "we did it because we could," which is nothing more than the principle of the "law of the jungle" and "might makes right" in international relations. (This is the same logic that Germany used for invading Austria and Poland.)
There are ethnic minorities located in virtually every country of the world, including Kurds in Iraq, Basque separatists in Spain, Turks in Cyprus, and the list goes on. The US position is that there is something fundamentally “unique” about Kosovo that does not apply in any of these other cases, but the US has declined to explain just what that is. What principle is being applied in Kosovo that should also be applied in other cases of the same type? The US cannot verbalize any such principles; because the US is not acting according to any principle, other than apparently “we can bully whoever we want.”
#6 FactFinder
on March 10, 2008 at 6:28 a.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
continued...
One thing is certain; Kosovo will never be a “normal” nation. It will remain nothing more than a protectorate of the US and NATO, because it will never have a seat at the UN General Assembly. Russia will veto that, not simply to cause problems, but rather because Kosovo statehood is illegal, and it was done unilaterally, without considering the interests of Russia and its Serbian ally.
So exactly how is it helpful for the world to move away from our present system where every nation is recognized by every other nation, based on universal principle and international law (UN state recognition), to a system where state recognition now becomes merely “subjective,” with some countries and blocks recognizing certain states and other countries and blocks not recognizing them? Wasn’t that exactly the unstable system the world had before our present system of international relations was so painstakingly set up in the decades after the Second World War? What American interest could possibly be served by such a move? But this is exactly what this action means. This just the latest idiotic move from this breathtakingly idiotic US administration!
#7 Greko
on March 10, 2008 at 6:32 a.m.(Valley Stream, NY | Unverified Name)
Mecedon your perception of reality is just as diluted as your argument of self determination. Let it be known you Macedonian-Slavs are in no way shape or form any way even remotely associated with Ancient Macedonians.
#8 Genti
on March 10, 2008 at 6:40 a.m.(Utrecht, Netherlands | Unverified Name)
What a ridiculous post! A lot of conspiracy theories and skin-deep arguments. Of course the port of Vlora in Albania is just a few miles away from the US refineries. And America's energy security depends on AMBO. What nonsense!
Further, being a senior Clinton official does not make one the most qualified person to pass judgment on what interests were involved in the break-up of Yugoslavia.
FYI the Republic Kosova is not built on thin air. It has all elements of statehood, i.e a people (yes over 90% of the citizens of Kosova are Albanians), borders (as they were under Yugoslavia), and a newly elected and functioning government! The NATO intervention prevented an irreversible ethnic cleansing which the Belgrade authorities (Milosevic and co.) were carrying out. From that moment on turning back under the same roof with the Serb regime was impossible! The likes of Kostunica would like an empty Kosova, just like Milosevic did! But the times of empty nationalist rhetorics and politics are almost over in the Balkans!
Turkey as well as other states recognized the State of Kosova as they're agreed that it is a sui generis case. Further, nobody is speaking about dividing Albania or Kosova, but the two Albanian States will obviously cooperate with each-other for the benefit of their peoples.
Independence for Kosova was easier to achieve than for any other independence movement, for all reasons which make Kosova a sui generis case! And mind you, keeping a people's future hostage because of hypothetical Doomday scenarios makes as much sense as this column.
I suggest that next time when you try to write something do a bit of research and read some history instead of selling half-baked arguments of someone whose name is Escobar and maybe does not even know where Kosova lies!
#9 FactsFinder
on March 10, 2008 at 6:46 a.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
As for Concerned American,tight to self-determination,huh.Mr. Concerned, you were of course not there to witness HOW Kosovo came to be predominantly Albanian in the past century, History does not start when CNN cameras start rolling. Any opinion can be justified as fact if you cherry pick historical events so let's put those aside for a moment.
Accepting that Albanians cannot live under Serbian rule on Serbian territory, surely you can also accept that Serbians cannot live under Albanian rule on Albanian territory (Kosovo after independence).
Any statement you make regarding the Albanian minority in Serbia should surely also apply to the Serbian minority in Kosovo. Don't they also deserve independence from Kosovo as Kosovo does from Serbia? (Even though the torching of their houses and churches got NONE coverage)
Either you have sovereign multi ethnic countries, or you have newly formed ethnically pure ones.
Take your pick, but you cannot have it both ways.
One more thing, Why were the Bosnian Serbs denied their inherent human right to self-determination? Why were the Krajina Serbs denied the same right to self-determination?
The U.S. destroyed the secession and independence of the Krajina Republic and then the Serbian Republic in Bosnia. Conversely, it fought an illegal war on behalf of Kosovo Albanian Muslims to establish a second Albanian state in Europe.The Krajina region was a majority Serbian area, 90% Serbian. Many parts of Bosnia were 90% Serbian. Why did the US oppose their inherent right to self-determination? The Knin area of Krajina was approximately 90% Serbian majority.
But of course the way the US brainwashing technique worked was in this case to ignore the Serbian majority. In other words, whether Knin was 90% was irrelevant because the UN had recognized Croatia’s borders.
Now with Serbia, the US brainwasher took the opposite position.
#10 Genti
on March 10, 2008 at 7 a.m.(Utrecht, Netherlands | Unverified Name)
To FactsFinder:
Please check the facts before you write and don't create them according to your appetite! Serbia and Russia are concerned because international law is not being observed? Who are you kidding? If anyone was or is bullying others is exactly these two States!
Albanians are not an ethnic minority in Kosova! They are the overwhelming majority! And don't mix the notions of nation and State. They're very different! There are many nations which for one reasons or another are divided among different States. A case at hand are the Albanians, who are bordered on all sides by fellow Albanians! However, they are not asking for a reshaping of borders!
The State of Kosova is a reality, whether some States accept it or not! And recognition by the UN is not a condition for a State to exist. FYI China was not a UN member till the 70s, but would you say that it was not a State? Please, go back and study a bit of international law on the issue of State recognition and related theories. And wait and see, sooner or later Russia will have to accept that reality.
#11 FactsFinder
on March 10, 2008 at 7:28 a.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
..."Independence for Kosova was easier to achieve ..."
hmm, why is it easier you say? So you admit it.Might makes it right ? Otherwise you did not state those reasons. Truth still remains …Albanian Muslims were a majority in a SMALL section of Serbia.
The invitation to war or to intervention is almost always a propagandist's appeal to blinded emotion over reason, to a subset of convenient facts over the greater set of historical and present truths. About 475 BC, the Athenian playwright Aeschylus wrote "In war, the first casualty is truth," In Kosovo the facts --and international law, for that matter--support the Serbs and not the guerrillas of the KLA!!!
As for Milosevic and invented genocide...
Ladies and gentlemen what we see at play here is the Goebbles concept of “Tell a lie a hundred times and it becomes the truth!
The claim that Milosevic butchered Albanians in Kosovo is pure propaganda-inspired fiction. As for his "personal responsibility"… well, the Hague Inquisition spent three years trying to prove it, with thousands of investigators, paid experts, and troops at its call, and managed to produce… nothing.
There's only one thing missing from all the claims of Milosevic's guilt: evidence.
Neil Clark, covering the UN War Crimes Tribunal for the Guardian in 2003, wrote that "not only has the prosecution signally failed to prove Milosevic's personal responsibility for atrocities committed on the ground, the nature and extent of the atrocities themselves has also been called into question." In the worst massacre that Milosevic had been charged with--at Srebrenica in 1995--the prosecution "produced nothing to challenge the verdict of the five-year inquiry commissioned by the Dutch government--that there was 'no proof that orders for the slaughter came from Serb political leaders in Belgrade.'"
"The trial has heard more than 100 prosecution witnesses, and not a single one has testified that Milosevic ordered war crimes," wrote John Laughland in the British Spectator.
Yeah yeah… I know. It was all Milosevic's fault. Everything bad that ever happened in the history of the world was his fault -- you can be sure of it. They said so, didn't they, on CNN and BBC? Therefore, it must be so. Isn't it interesting how the only truly multi-ethnic former province of Yugoslavia is Serbia -- now how does that work?
#12 Carl
on March 10, 2008 at 8:11 a.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
I strongly disagree with absurd claim that somehow Kosovo is unique case. And here is why.
Why Kosovo is NOT a unique case
I read here claims that Kosovo is unique because of…
1. Moral reasons, i.e. Slobodan Milosevic Milosevic era is over. Given their postwar treatment of Kosovo Serbs and other minorities (235.000 IDPs, 2000+ killed or kidnapped, 4600 armed attacks, 176 churches demolished, 20.000 homes usurpated...), Kosovo Albanians have also lost all moral credit
2.Majority wants
Right to self-determination does not precede territorial integrity
3.Ten years of institutional discrimination Kosovo Albanians have demanded independence even during Tito's golden age period
4.1998-99 conflict and 6,000 victims
In 1998-99, 40 conflicts worldwide were reported with at least 1,000 victims each
NATO intervention.NATO intervention was illegal from the point of view of international law
5.Presence of peacekeepers and transitional international administration
Dozens of UN missions in crisis regions, none has brought about a new state
6.Fear of violence
US, NATO and EU have all the instruments to prevent any such violence
7.Urgency
No violation of human rights, no armed conflict, therefore no urgency, compared to other hotspots
#13 Genti
on March 10, 2008 at 8:15 a.m.(Utrecht, Netherlands | Unverified Name)
To Factsfinder:
Again, it is easy to bend facts to suit your point of view. I said it was easier for Kosova to achieve independence because of the existing facts and set of circumstances. It was not might making it right but the gradual, necessary and long due rectification of a historical injustice committed against Albanians.
And besides the will of the people of Kosova to be independent there was enough international consent, save the usual suspects. A lot of time and effort was spent on taking everybody on board, but that proved impossible. How can one expect someone like Kostunica who still offers safe heaven to the most wanted war criminal as Mladic to accept what is just and logical?
As for Goebbels saying which you bring up, that would apply perfectly to the Serbian created myth of Kosova being its heartland and cradle of civilization. They repeated it so many times to themselves that they ended up believing it! But, it is a bit strange to have your heart outside your body??? And as for civilization...the Balkans have seen enough of that expressed in the war crimes committed in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the SAO Krajina during the Balkan wars.
It is not CNN and BBC saying that but all independent media, even part of that printed in Serbia proper.
With all due respect, Clark (http://neilclark66.blogspot.com/) and Laughland (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Lau...), even if they said what you say they did, are not legal commentators and cannot say anything authoritative on the issue of Milosevic's guilt for genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity with which he was charged. His sudden death made it impossible for the Tribunal to finish the process against him. In spite of his political speeches he could not legally defend what he did and there should not be any doubt that on the evidence presented until then he would have been found guilty beyond any reasonable doubt.
On your last point! How comes Serbia is the only multi-ethnic country? Try this: Over centuries it expanded its territories on the expense of the neighboring countries! That's why other ethnicities find themselves inside the Serbian State.
#14 Eye-Opened
on March 10, 2008 at 8:24 a.m.(UW Campus | Unverified Name)
The "UnderReported"? Mr. Ganapathiraju, I think we understand your agenda enough by now for you to call it what it really is - the "AntiAmerican". This common theme in these strips is certainly not world events we haven't heard about - since when is Kosovo under-reported? What unites your articles is a desire to paint the US in the worst light possible in every situation, and to seek out the situations that lend themselves best to negative interpretation. I'm not sure what gave you this grudge against the US, but fortunately for you, it is one of the few countries where you are completely free to publish stuff like this. In that sense, every article you publish is actually a testament to the greatness of this nation.
#15 lee mayr
on March 10, 2008 at 9:39 a.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
I think,the trial of Milosevic was billed as the most important exercise of international jurisprudence since the days of Nuremberg, had become something of a joke unto iteself. The prosecution failed to demonstrate Milosevic direct responsibility for the crimes committed in Kosovo or Bosnia between 1992-99. No smoking gun was produced, no skeletons found in the former Yugoslavia leader's closet. Milosevic's case resembles the case of Segei Mikhailov, alias Mikhas, the alleged head of Russian mob, prosecuted by Carla Del Ponte back in 1996-98. At the time the Swiss Federal Prosecutor Carla del Ponte claimed Mikhas was the leader of one of Russia's most powerful criminal gangs - the Solntsevo gang. So dangerous was Mikhailov that had to be driven around Zurich in an armored personnel carrier, escorted by the heavily armed SWAT team. Once in court, however, Mikhailov's case collapsed due to the lack of evidence. Not only Mikhas was acquitted, but he in turn sued the Swiss government and, in 2000, and won almost half a million dollars in damages. The point is not so much the innocence of Sergei Mikhailov, as the incompetence of Carla Del Ponte and her team. After keeping Mikhailov for two years in jail, spending thousands of tax-payers dollars investigating his business activities, and failing in the end to prove his guilt, Del Ponte blamed Moscow - (of course, whom else) - for her professional fiasco. But then again, in the arcane world of international bureaucracy, incompetance may easily become a virtue - Del Ponte was soon promoted to become Chief Prosecutor in the Hague.
The trial of Milosevic presented a pattern similar to the trial of Mikhas. But there is a difference: wheras Del Ponte's failure to prosecute Mikhas was the victory of the Swiss legal system as it clearly demonstrated its impartiality, it is very unlikely that the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (or the ICTY ) will be able to follow the same path. Milosevic is most likely to be found guilty regardless of the evidence presented in court. International bureaucracy is guided by the sense of political opportunism and self-preservation, rather than the quest for justice or professional integrity. This seems to be more and more the case of the ICTY. Truly independent court requires transparency and impartiality and in the case of the ICTY both are lacking. Not only the way the court functions, including the criteria used for its personnel selection, and the gathering of evidence, remain obscure, but its impartiality is dubious.
#16 lee mayr
on March 10, 2008 at 9:39 a.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
So far, the ICTY failed to bring to justice those who, in violation of the UN embargo, supplied weapons to the warring sides in the Yugoslav conflict, who financed human rights violations in Croatia and Bosnia, who ordered one of the biggest ethnic cleansing in the history of Balkan wars - the expulsion of 150 000 Krajna Serbs, who incited the war in Kosovo by financing, arming and training the so-called Kosovo Liberation Army, who allowed to use the territory of the former Yugoslavia as the training ground for the Al-Quada militants. A few Croatian generals, and one high-ranking Albanian drug-trafficker (Ramush Haradinaj), but that is about all the tribunal could achieve in terms of persecuting the non-Serbian war criminal suspects. To this day Milosevic is the only top politician from the former Yugoslavia to stand trial for the atrocities, committed by all sides, and not the least - by the US and European allies and pending members of the enlarged European Union. The information is in abundance, but the action is nil.
The ICTY was supposed to be the first step towards creating the permanent International Court of Justice. It was meant to define the logic upon which this new international institution ought be built. It should have affirmed the principle of justice for all, not for the handful of rich and powerful nations. Alas, it did not happen and it will not happen. As long as Carla Del Ponte remains chief prosecutor of the ICTY, incompetence and cynicism will prevail, condemning international jurisprudence to take on the function of the day time TV sitcom for the culturally disadventaged.
P.S. I am not a legal expert, and may be Milosevic was a real S.O.B. Nevertheless, I believe our democratic jurisprudence is based on the principle of the presumption of innocence. Was this principle ever applied to Milosevic?
#17 Kumbaya
on March 10, 2008 at 10:08 a.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
No, no,Kosovo has hardly made an even remotely plausible case for its having earned independence. First, for all the talk of "Kosovars" and "Kosovans," the residents of Kosovo identify themselves as either Serb or as Albanian; the languages they speak is either Serbian or Albanian. Creating a second Albanian state in Europe makes no sense whatsoever. It doesn't govern itself. It is a ward of various international bodies. Economically, it is a basket case, and lives off vast handouts. Kosovo is an example of an ethnic minority grabbing a piece of territory, permitting unrestricted immigration by its co-nationals from a neighboring state, ethnically cleansing the territory of all other groups and thereby creating an artificial overwhelming ethnic majority, and then demanding that these actions be rewarded by the bestowal of independent statehood.
#18 Get Real
on March 10, 2008 at 10:09 a.m.(Goodyear, AZ | Unverified Name)
Genti is obviously Albanian, He refers to the ficticious country as Kosova (called KOSOVO, always has, always will). Bottom line, Serbs should be proud they didn't sell themselves and their souls, as did the albanians, time and time again. Has anyone asked themselves, with billions of dollars in foreign aid pouring into Kosovo and the billions of dollars they make in illegal activity, why is their unemployment rate above 40%. Because its easier to take than to work for it! Genti, for someone who spews so-called facts, your knowledge is shallow. The AMBO pipeline is real, your statement towards FactsFinder proves, just because you can spell and use big words doesn't mean you know what you are talking about. As far as I can see Kosova (spelled Kosovo) is a big "Pipe Dream" not a humanitarian intervention. Oh, and Certi, I am going to take away your only response. Yes, I am Serbian, but I am American as well. This is coming from the American side, "hurry up with the oil, summer is coming and our SUV's are ready!
#19 iopscusa
on March 10, 2008 at 10:15 a.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
I have to agree with prior comment.
Kosovans are not a nation, so why should they have a nation state? Nor is it a multi-ethnic state where the rights of all are respected. It is small, economically unviable, unstable political entity which arouses great enmity from its neighbours and can act as a base for organised crime in the future. Already Albania is a hub of drug trade, processing heroin from Afghanistan, and a centre for human trafficking for the purpose of prostitution; and if you want a cheap stolen Mercedes, Albania is also the place for you because it is a lawless centre of organised crime.
Another problem is that Kosovo has the potential to become a foothold in Europe for Islamic militants. Yes, Britain and America are facilitating the emergence of a base for radical Muslim jihadists right under their noses. We know already that jihadists from Yemen and Chechnya have fought for the KLA and that Saudi Arabia has pumped huge amounts of money into building mosques and religious centres there.
Albanian militants sought to organise an attack on a US army base in New Jersey last year. Unless they are dealt with very differently there is a danger that Kosovo will become a beachhead of Islamic terrorism in Europe. Al-Qaeda has already gained a position there and is unlikely to give it up for obvious strategic reasons. The American people will quickly find that betraying the Serbian people of Kosovo as a PR exercise in Islamic countries will backfire on them.
We know of Serbian anger over the loss of Kosovo, and can be sure that this dispute will come back again until resolved. The anger of a dispossessed Serbian people awaits us unless the situation is dealt with in a different fashion.
When a NATO commander ordered the British Army to prevent Russian planes from landing in the Kosovan capital in 1999 General Sir Michael Jackson refused, saying: "Sir, I'm not starting World War III for you."
Before the USA goes any further it is important to address some of the difficulties which will arise from Kosovo's break from international law. Otherwise this regional dispute will fester until the inevitable happens. The First World War began with a single shot in Sarajevo, just up the road from Kosovo. GWB should learn from history or repeat its mistakes.
#20 dragnet2
on March 10, 2008 at 10:20 a.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
I bet a whole lot of Serbs are asking right about now is WHY the "Empire" is so hell-bent on supporting Greater Albania and dismembering Serbia? To say that atrocities - both real and quite made up - were the actual cause of Imperial intervention in the Balkans is folly; they were an excuse - hence all the fabrications - nothing more. Ignoring the real genocide in Rwanda while making up a genocide in Bosnia; imposing a UN blockade harsher than the one against Iraq because of alleged "Serb aggression," then launching aggressive wars of its own (1999, 2003); condemning "ethnic cleansing," but sponsoring the largest instances thereof (half a million or so Serbs from today's Croatia and Kosovo) - how much more proof do we need that the Empire does not have a moral compass?
Almost 2000 years ago, Apostle Paul wrote, "there is nothing new under the sun." That is certainly a good description of American foreign policy. Its Russophobia is British in origin; its dislike of Serbs appears to be borrowed from Austria-Hungary and Nazi Germany (as is its choice of "allies" in the region). But the sheer stupidity of demolishing the international order over a patch of land utterly insignificant to anyone but the Serbs and the Albanians... that's 100% Made in America.
They should have outsorced it. Seriously
#21 Robin Owens
on March 10, 2008 at 11:52 a.m.(Southampton, United Kingdom | Unverified Name)
What about the Wilsonian right for Independence via self-determination for all Vojvodina? What about the reunification of Northern with Southern Bukovina and all of Moldova under the Rumanian roof?
#22 American Soldier
on March 10, 2008 at 11:57 a.m.(Lordsburg, NM | Unverified Name)
I've spent a year on Bondsteel. Yes, there is an oil pipeline running through the area, but I don't think it's even in use. As for the “a sort of smaller — and friendlier — five-star Guantanamo, with perks like Thai massage and loads of junk food,” comment, CBS (Camp BondSteel) has a small detainment center, which rarely has inhabitants. The detainees never even have access to the PX to get the just food. Even if they did, they'd most likely have no money as most everyone there is rather poor. This isn't about oil at all. Our entire focus over there is the safety and wellbeing of the people of Kosova. I believe that Serbia has no right to assert reign over a peoples that does not want them. It's like us and the British, back in the revolution. We simply did not wish to be under British rule anymore. And we took matters into our own hand. We declared our Independance, and England reacted with war. Luckly Serbia hasn't done the same yet, and I hope they won't. I noticed how you keep saying the word "prevent" when you talk of the '99 war in Kosovo. We weren't preventing anything. The genocide wasn't about to happen. It was happening. We stopped it in progress. There was no "prevention" to it. Kosovars have the inaliable right to govern themselves as they see fit, not as Belgrade sees fit. When the dust finally clears from the secession, Kosova will begin to prosper and improve.
#23 milwguy
on March 10, 2008 at 11:59 a.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
Let's see what mess we go ourselves into here.
NATO's promises to create a functioning, multiethnic society in Kosovo have fallen short in countless ways. Human rights groups decry the "culture of impunity" with which non-Albanian ethnic minorities can be killed and their property destroyed. In the first year after NATO took control of Kosovo, more than 500 members of non-Albanian ethnic minorities were killed, yet not a single person has ever been convicted of these crimes. No one involved in atrocities such as the massacre of more than a dozen farmers working their fields in Kosovo in July 1999, or the February 2001 bus bombing that killed 11 people, or the machine gun massacre of children swimming in a river in August 2003 has ever been brought to justice. Murders that occur in public in broad daylight produce no witnesses; local police refuse to investigate murders of non-Albanian ethnic minorities. On the rare occasion when someone is arrested, local judicial officials refuse to prosecute them. Not a single leading Kosovo Albanian politician would publicly condemn attacks on non-Albanians during the March pogroms.
The impunity with which non-Albanian ethnic minorities in Kosovo can be murdered is compounded by the systematic persecution directed against them in every sphere of public life. In 2002, the head of the United Nations' education department in Kosovo announced that he was quitting his post because it was proving impossible to stop discrimination against Serbs and other minorities. In Kosovo's mental institutions, Mental Disability Rights International reported in 2002 that there "is a pervasive pattern of serious abuses. The rule of law simply does not apply within these psychiatric facilities. We found extreme, inhuman and degrading treatment, arbitrary detention and the physical and sexual assault of women, and we received a blanket denial from the authorities." Most of the patients in these facilities were Serbs. In 2003, Amnesty International reported that non-Albanian ethnic minorities "find themselves subjected to both direct and indirect discrimination when seeking access to basic civil, political, social, economic and cultural rights."
On the fifth anniversary of NATO's "war to save Kosovo," what has happened in what British Prime Minister Tony Blair once called "the heart of Europe" is undeniable: NATO has played midwife at the birth of a fascist pseudo-state run by narco-terrorists. The next time U.S. and NATO leaders decide to "save" other parts of the world, they would do well to remember the lessons of the Kosovo intervention. And that the road to Hell is often paved with good intentions.
#24 Red in Blue
on March 10, 2008 at 12:06 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
That Kosovo was “unique” has been the Western officials’ mantra for years! I see this Albanian guy "Genti" makes here hysterical statement illustrating the lengths to which his side will go to justify what obviously can’t be justified.
Milosevic tried to annihilate over one million Kosovar Albanian Muslims? The Foundation for Humanitarian Law led by Nata_a Kandi_, much beloved and much bankrolled by Western governments and non-governmental organizations, runs a project seeking to establish the number of dead and missing in Kosovo. According to an article in the Croatian magazine, Globus, “The project has documented 9,702 people dead or missing during the war in Kosovo from 1998 to 2000. Of this number, as things stand now, 4,903 killed and missing are Albanians and 2,322 are Serbs, with the rest either belonging to other nationalities or their ethnic identity remaining uncertain.” One should add also that these numbers say nothing about how people were killed, whether in combat or otherwise, and by whom. And there’s no clarification as to how many were killed by NATO bombs. What these numbers do reveal is that it was the Serbs, not the Albanians, who suffered disproportionately in Kosovo. If USA/NATO and Albanians are right and 94 or 95 per cent of the people that live there are Kosovar Albanian Muslims, that means that there are 19 times as many Albanians as there are Serbs in Kosovo. Yet, according to these numbers, the Albanians’ casualty numbers are only slightly more than twice the size of the Serb casualty numbers.
The war between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh resulted in far worse casualty numbers. The U.S. State Department itself admits, “More than 30,000 people were killed in the fighting from 1992 to 1994.”According to the CIA, “over 800,000 mostly ethnic Azerbaijanis were driven from the occupied lands and Armenia; about 230,000 ethnic Armenians were driven from their homes in Azerbaijan into Armenia.”
In any case, if bad treatment of the local population were to disqualify a state from exercising sovereignty over part of its territory, then an awful lot of countries would be eligible for enforced amputation: Turkey would have to be stripped of Turkish Kurdistan; Israel would long ago have been given the boot from the West Bank and other occupied territories; Indonesia would be denied Aceh and Papua; Pakistan would lose Waziristan.
#25 Red in Blue
on March 10, 2008 at 12:09 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
Kosovo’s claim to independent statehood is based on one fact only: The Albanians are the overwhelming majority in Kosovo. They are Muslims in a Christian state to which they don’t want to belong. Yet this argument is convincing only to the willfully ignorant. First, the majority of Kosovo may be Muslim; but the Kosovo Albanians are only a small minority within Serbia as a whole. Kosovo would vote overwhelmingly for independence; Serbia would vote overwhelmingly against. Serbia is a legal entity; Kosovo is not. A Serbian vote trumps a Kosovo one. Second, there is nothing unusual about an overwhelmingly-Muslim inhabited province existing within a state that is overwhelmingly non-Muslim. There are the Muslim Moros who inhabit Mindanao in the Philippines. There is the Xinjiang province in China. There is Kashmir, overwhelmingly Muslim, many of whom live under Indian rule. Russia is replete with provinces in which the population is overwhelmingly Muslim — Tatarstan, Bashkiristan, Dagestan, Chechnya. Northern Cyprus is overwhelmingly Muslim — yet, except for Turkey, no country in the world recognizes it as an independent state. Muslim Narathiwat, Pattani and Yala provinces in Thailand are waging an insurgency to free themselves from Bangkok’s Buddhist rule.
And of course, there is the West Bank, yet another Muslim population, subjected to the rule of non-Muslims. In all of these cases, there has been an Islamic insurgency, a war seeking to liberate Muslims from the rule of non-Muslims, and considerable government repression. Yet, Western leaders do not splutter about unsustainable status quos, they do not demand immediate U.N. Security Council action, they do not insist that independence must be granted immediately and they do not threaten to ignore the United Nations and embrace a seceding state.
Therefore I must conclude: the West’s entire approach to Kosovo has been marked by sordid dishonesty and bad faith, supporting national self-determination and the right to secession in one place and territorial integrity in another, cheering on ethnic cleansing by one ethnic group and demanding war crimes trials for another, trumpeting the virtues of majority rule when it’s convenient to do so and threatening to impose sanctions and penalties on majorities when that’s convenient. For the Americans, Kosovo is nothing more than the hinterland of a giant military base, a key presence in the eastern Mediterranean should Greece or Turkey prove unreliable. As for the duly grateful Albanians, they are expected to repay their benefactors by agreeing to be cannon fodder in future imperial wars. For the Europeans, Kosovo is an opportunity to show the world that Europe counts for something and to conduct various pointless social experiments in multiculturalism and multiconfessionalism — particularly pointless since Kosovo will be one of the most ethnically homogeneous places in Europe.
#26 can't fool me
on March 10, 2008 at 12:19 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
Dear "American Soldier" I would like you to tell me where exactly you been in Kosovo and when. You see, I am wondering how you missed the Serbian enclaves, the places where 1000 year old monasteries were not just burned down, but the the foundation stones ripped out to symbolise total removal. How did you miss the daily attack on Serbs huddled in their NATO
guarded enclaves? How did you miss the abductions, the arms deals in the cafes, the trafficked women? So tell us “American Soldier”, where exactly were you? You see I think you misguided because I have never met anyone who has been to Kosovo who has not returned horrified by the plight of non-Albanian minorities there.
Independence for Kosovo Now? Naah, not convincing enough. Only If human trafficking, corruption and drug running were prerequisites for deserving independence Kosovo would satisfy such criteria hands down.
Kosovo’s provisional government (PISG) has had eight years to show that it is mature enough to lead all citizens of Kosovo into the future, but it has miserably failed. Eight years after NATO’S Bombing campaign and four years after the massive orchestrated Ethnic Cleansing campaign against Serbs, Roma, Bosniaks, Turks, Croats and Jewish citizens in March 2004, there still is no assurance that all the citizens of Kosovo can live in peace, with security, with freedom of movement and with full participation in all the fruits of society. On the contrary, today in the capital Pristina, which had a pre war Serb population of 40000, not one single Serb resides in the capital. Can it be that all of these citizens were war criminals? Can it be that grandmothers and children were war criminals deserving retribution? However, in Belgrade, the capital of Serbia, 110000 Albanians live comfortably and safely!
Throughout all of Kosovo 200000 Serbs have been ethnically cleansed , another 100000 Roma have been ethnically cleansed, thousands of other minorities citizens (Bosniaks, Turks, Croats and Jews) have been ethnically cleansed, the majority of which have sought refuge in Serbia Proper! Why is that? Kosovo says its ready for Independence, but why cant it guarantee the safety of these refugee citizens? It has been eight long years! Hardly any refugee citizens have been able to return, even though NATO is there to protect them. 1000 Serbs and Roma citizens have been murdered, another 1000 are still missing. How many Albanian citizens of Kosovo have been murdered in the same amount of time relative to their demographic proportion of society? 150 UNESCO recognized Christian Churches and Shrines have been destroyed by the majority Albanian citizens. None have been rebuilt even though the Kosovo government (PISG) has explicitly agreed to this task. Not one in eight years? But, yet Kosovo is ready for Independence?
#27 can't fool me
on March 10, 2008 at 12:19 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
Tens of thousands of minority owned properties have been illegally occupied and appropriated by the majority Albanian citizens with no prospect of return to the rightful owners.
Yet Kosovo society is ready for Independence? Tens of thousands of hectare/acres of Serbia Orthodox Christian Church owned land has been illegally appropriated with no prospect of return. Yet Kosovo is ready for independence? Kosovo suffers the highest unemployment rate in Europe, some estimates as high as 70%. But yet Kosovo is ready for Independence? Rampant crime and the center of European Heroin and Human Trafficking trade. Yet ready for independence?
Seems like the anti-International law promoters of ethnic secesionism are running out of rational arguments and continuing to spin to vouch for their view with the old simplified Serb “evil” anyone else “saints” to justify their illegal arguments. It does not wash anymore and does little to cover up for the lack of legality and the precedence it would set if it does at all happen.
#28 Philly
on March 10, 2008 at 12:29 p.m.(Villanova, PA | Unverified Name)
"FactsFinder," just because you possess a distorted wet dream view of Kosovo, it does not make your rants legitimate.
If the majority of former Yugoslav countries recognize Kosovo (as it looks like it to be), its independence would be seen as a continuance of the dissolution of Yugoslavia, under international law. Remember that international law is still in its infancy and it is neither according to your views or the views of Serbia when it sees fit. If we were to abide by international law, then its highest primary component should have been respected in the first place by Serbia. These are called general principles, and it includes genocide and crimes against humanity.
If you want to use the "international law card," than please be consistent. The facts are that Kosovo was a constituent part of Yugoslavia, with the same vote as Serbia in the Federal Presidency. It had well defined borders and its own government.
The latest developments, namely Serbian army reservists attacking border checkpoints between Kosovo and Serbia shows quite clearly how things would have been under Serbia.
#29 amazed
on March 10, 2008 at 12:30 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
"It's like us and the British, back in the revolution. We simply did not wish to be under British rule anymore"
That made no sence whatsoever.
Those countries you mentioned were independant in the first place, and at the time US broke away from britain there was no international law. Plus america was a colony which kosovo certanly isn't.
Most ignorant post in this thread by far.
Counterpoint to the civil war which the United States crushed with no abandon. The south was not happy with the north and it escalated into a civil war, how is this any different? Sections of countries can't just up and leave whenever the hell they feel like. Citing historical precedence goes both ways...
#30 Gligor Tashkovich
on March 10, 2008 at 12:44 p.m.(None, None | Unverified Name)
I believe that I am the only person (here) who is qualified to make a comment about the AMBO Trans-Balkan Oil Pipeline Project. This is because I was a co-founder of this project back in the Summer of 1993 (not 1986) along with other members of my family.
The reporting (and I refer to the full article in addition to the excerpt here) done by Pepe Escobar, a so-called journalist with the Asian Times is largely spurious and must be repudiated.
The routing for the AMBO project does NOT go through, in, or even near Kosovo. It connects the Black Sea with the Adriatic Sea and largely follows Corridor 8 in most cases which connects the Republics of Bulgaria, Macedonia, and Albania.
I firmly and completely reject any and all insinuations and conspiracy theorists who would attempt to link the AMBO project to Kosovo.
#31 Get Real
on March 10, 2008 at 12:50 p.m.(Goodyear, AZ | Unverified Name)
American Soldier, are you really an American Soldier? or an Albanian hired by Halliburton, making you an American by association. Don't use words like "We" unless you have a mouse in your pocket. If the pipeline that runs underneath Bondsteel has no use, why was it preserved when building Bondsteel? As a matter of fact, the base was redesigned because of the pipeline. Since you have access to the net, look up AMBO and statement by Albania's president in reference to Kosovo. As a "Soldier" can you answer a few questions, honestly? 1) If Serbs are so un-civilized and evil, why did they hand over Milosevic to the Hague, while Albanians like Ceku and Thaci (Bin Ladin puppets) are elected and praised? 2) Bin Laden has never set foot in Serbia, and never will. Can you say the same about Kosovo? 3) If Mexicans in Southern California (say Chula Vista) were to start killing police officers with the support of the Mexican government, how would you react?
#32 FactsFinder
on March 10, 2008 at 12:52 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
Philly, I note you deliberate use of the word "part" to describe Kosovo, thereby conflating it status with that of the Yugoslav republics to further the argument for secession.
In the Communist Yugoslavia Kosovo was an autonomous province, but it was nonetheless a province within the republic of Serbia. This is explicitly stated in all Yugoslav constitutions (I can provide references, if required). What's true is that gradually, through successive constitutions, both the republics and the two provinces (Vojvodina and Kosovo) grew more autonomous from the federal government, and did the provinces in relation to Serbia itself. With the 1974 Constitution the two provinces were basically equivalent to the republics, but even then they were formally still a part of Serbia.
Finally though the abolishment of the autonomy of the two provinces by Milosevic was certainly abusive, Kosovo remained a part of a new successor state of the former Yugoslavia, the FRY (Serbia and Montenegro), which, despite its claims to the contrary, did not have continuity with the old Yugoslavia. Serbia, however, DOES have continuity with the FRY, as was explicitly recognized, inter alia, by the UN, the Council of Europe, the ICJ and the ECtHR. Therefore, any safeguards of territorial integrity of the FRY stipulated in UNSC Res 1244 , continue to apply to Serbia
In other words, though the secession of Kosovo is historically certainly a part of the process of the breakup of the former Yugoslavia, legally it is most certainly not. Kosovo is NOT a successor state of the former Yugoslavia, but is at best a successor state of Serbia (FRY), as is, bizarrely, the state of Montenegro, which obtained independence with Serbian consent and which actually was a full-fledged republic in the former Yugoslavia. Kosovo does not, for example, have a claim to any of the embassies or assets of the former Yugoslavia, which were divided among its successor states via treaty.
#33 Get Real
on March 10, 2008 at 1:08 p.m.(Goodyear, AZ | Unverified Name)
Gligor,
Since you state you are the only qualified person on this forum to speak, please give me your input on this statement.
"The pipeline does not pass through the former Yugoslavia, but there’s no question that it featured prominently in Balkan war politics. On December 9 1998, the Albanian president attended a meeting about the scheme in Sofia, and linked it inextricably to Kosovo. “It is my personal opinion,” he noted, “that no solution confined within Serbian borders will bring lasting peace.” The message could scarcely have been blunter: if you want Albanian consent for the Trans-Balkan pipeline, you had better wrest Kosovo out of the hands of the Serbs."
#34 quintinhoare
on March 10, 2008 at 1:17 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
Diehard anti-Serb/pro-Kosovo independence enthusiasts have a series of talking points which in their view legitimizes the dismembering of Serbia.
Ethnic Albanians in Kosovo enjoyed all the human and civil rights due them before the intrusion of the Albanian terrorists and drug dealers who would organize the Kosovo Liberation Army, the notorious KLA. Just prior to the recent war in Kosovo, the University of Pristina in Kosovo had 37,000 students enrolled in it, eighty percent of whom were ethnic Albanians. The Pristina Radio and Television Station was broadcasting their programs in the Albanian language all day. There was one Albanian Daily and eleven periodicals. Just prior to recent war the government of Yugoslavia was providing enormous subsidies to the province of Kosovo. The mistake made by the Serbs was setting up a party-run state instead of a constitutional government that would give effective sovereignty to the Republic of Serbia over its entire territory, including Kosovo and Metohija. The assumption was that all the people of Kosovo and Metohija, including the majority of Albanians who lived there, would remain loyal citizens of the Republic of Serbia, endowed with all the same rights and privileges accorded to the Serbian population and in some cases, above and beyond those rights that had been accorded to the Serbs.
If the educated group of politically powerful policy makers who were so instrumental in fashioning policy towards the Serbs in the 1990s had taken one serious, honest look at the real status of the Albanian and other minorities in the Republic of Serbia, they would have discovered that these individual ethnic groups enjoyed national, cultural, and civil rights on par with the most modern and best constitutional systems in the world. Article 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights states that persons belonging to ethnic, religious, or linguistic minorities shall not be denied the right in a community with the other members of their group, to enjoy their own culture, to profess and practice their own religion, or to communicate in their own language. The ethnic Albanians in Kosovo had all of this guaranteed them and more. But it wasn’t enough. They wanted and continue to demand TERRITORIAL autonomy. Imagine the implications this scenario would have in the United States of America if such demands by different national and ethnic groups were initiated and granted. There would be no more United States, and there would be no more America.
#35 Truth N Justice
on March 10, 2008 at 1:19 p.m.(West Palm Beach, FL | Unverified Name)
The Kosovo Albanians are so greatful for the U.S. support that the Duka brothers (Albanians) planned to kill as many U.S. soldiers as possible at Fort Dix in NJ. I don't know a lot. But I do know who my enemies are and it's definitely not the Serbs. The war on Terror!?!?! Give me a break.
If the Kosovo Independence sticks, which I don't think it will, that place will be a breading ground for Radical Islam. All you who support independence, its a simple choice.
Radical Islam v. Christian Serbs
If you choose the first, your either an Albanian, a Muslim, a democrat, or an imbecile.
#36 legaleye
on March 10, 2008 at 1:22 p.m.(Miami, FL | Unverified Name)
To Can't fool me
Thank you for using some of my words in your post, it is flattering, you may use them when ever you like, maybe throw some quotes on them, but for the sake of full clarity, I have included my full post below. Sorry that I have to use more than one post, but this issue does lend itself to extensive analysis and comment.
GENOCIDE IN KOSOVO
The West would love Serbia if only it would forget the past and accept the reality that the West has created. But accepting this reality is accepting Genocide.
Kosovo's provisional government (PISG) has had eight years to show that it is mature enough to lead all citizens of Kosovo into the future, but it has miserably failed. Eight years after NATO'S Bombing campaign and four years after the massive orchestrated Ethnic Cleansing campaign against Serbs, Roma, Bosniaks, Turks, Croats and Jewish citizens in March 2004, there still is no assurance that all the citizens of Kosovo can live in peace, with security, with freedom of movement and with full participation in all the fruits of society. On the contrary, today in the capital Pristina, which had a pre war Serb population of 40000, not one single Serb resides in the capital. Can it be that all of these citizens were war criminals? Can it be that grandmothers and children were war criminals deserving retribution? However, in Belgrade, the capital of Serbia, 110000 Albanians live comfortably and safely!
#37 legaleye
on March 10, 2008 at 1:23 p.m.(Miami, FL | Unverified Name)
Throughout all of Kosovo 200000 Serbs have been ethnically cleansed , another 100000 Roma have been ethnically cleansed, thousands of other minorities citizens (Bosniaks, Turks, Croats and Jews) have been ethnically cleansed, the majority of which have sought refuge in Serbia Proper! Why is that? Kosovo says its ready for Independence, but why cant it guarantee the safety of these refugee citizens? It has been eight long years! Hardly any refugee citizens have been able to return, even though NATO is there to protect them. 1000 Serbs and Roma citizens have been murdered, another 1000 are still missing. How many Albanian citizens of Kosovo have been murdered in the same amount of time relative to their demographic proportion of society? 150 UNESCO recognized Christian Churches and Shrines have been destroyed by the majority Albanian citizens. None have been rebuilt even though the Kosovo government (PISG) has explicitly agreed to this task. Not one in eight years? But, yet Kosovo is ready for Independence? Tens of thousands of minority owned properties have been illegally occupied and appropriated by the majority Albanian citizens with no prospect of return to the rightful owners. Yet Kosovo society is ready for Independence? Tens of thousands of hectare/acres of Serbia Orthodox Christian Church owned land has been illegally appropriated with no prospect of return. Yet Kosovo is ready for independence? Kosovo suffers the highest unemployment rate in Europe, some estimates as high as 70%. But yet Kosovo is ready for Independence? Rampant crime and the center of European Heroin and Human Trafficking trade. Yet ready for independence? A few western countries cower for independence siting Albanian threats of violence if independence is not recognized, but the international community and the EU is divided because recognition of a illegal Unilateral Declaration of Independence is the sanctioning of GENOCIDE AGAINST 300000 Serbs, Roma, Bosniaks, Turks, Croats and Jewish citizens of Kosovo! This is the reality the West wants Serbs to accept? No this is Genocide!
#38 legaleye
on March 10, 2008 at 1:27 p.m.(Miami, FL | Unverified Name)
This is not he first time Serbia has suffered Genocide, in WW2 upwards of 800000 Serbs, Jews and Roma were exterminated in the Nazi and Croatian Fascist extermination camps of Jasenovac and Stara Gradiska (a camp designed exclusively for woman and children). Likewise, tens of thousand of Serb, Roma and Jewish citizens were exterminated and ethnically cleansed in small villages throughout Yugoslavia by Nazis, Albanian Fascists of the SS Skandebeg Division, Croatian Ustashi Fascists and Bosnian Muslim fascists of the SS Handžar Division. Many in Serbia have tried to explain away some of the recent atrocities committed by Serbs, such as Srebanica, as a natural result of decades of emotional suppression, due to an organized communist campaign not to acknowledge the WW2 Genocide of Serbs, Roma and Jews in order to preserve unity among the different ethnic communities. However, regardless how this emotional suppression might have influenced the individual actors of the crimes committed, the universally accepted legal percept that one crime cannot justify another crime still is applicable. Likewise, whatever the extent of Milosevic's crimes in Kosovo (Albanians say 10 thousand dead, the UN acknowledges only 3500 on all sides) cannot justify the continued GENOCIDE of Serbs, Roma, Bosniaks, Turks, Croats and Jewish citizens of Kosovo! All 300000 ethnically cleansed Serbs, Roma, Bosniaks, Turks, Croats and Jewish citizens of Kosovo must be allowed to return to their homes. The International Community cannot sanction this GENOCIDE by recognizing a Illegal Unilateral Declaration of Independence of Kosovo. Serbia cannot acquiesce to this injustice. Serbs will invoke the anguished cry of our Jewish Brothers who have likewise suffered the indignity of Genocide....NEVER AGAIN the GEOCIDE STOPS NOW! There are over 600000 UN recognized Serb refuges in Serbia that have been cruelly cleansed from their homes in Croatia, Bosnia and KOSOVO! 250000 Serbs ethnically cleansed from Croatia, 150000 Serbs ethnically cleansed from Bosnia, 200000 Serbs from Kosovo and another 100000 Roma from Kosovo. None have been allowed to return. How is it possible that Serbs are accused of being the primary villain and purveyor of ethnic cleansing, but, yet again is the largest victim of ethnic cleansing? Is it possible that these innocent SERBS are somehow sub human not deserving of justice?
#39 legaleye
on March 10, 2008 at 1:28 p.m.(Miami, FL | Unverified Name)
The International Community must stop turning a blind eye to this GENOCIDE right in the heart of Europe. It is happening right before your eyes, with your assistance! Kosovo is the SERB's Jerusalem, they cannot agree to this GENOCIDE! Just like their Jewish Brothers who for centuries evoked the unifying cry of NEXT YEAR IN JERUSELEM, SERBS evoke THIS YEAR IN KOSOVO! All refuges must return NOW!Otherwise any recognition of a illegal declaration of independence is GENOCIDE! To the International community ALL SERBS DEMAND NEVER AGAIN, THE GENOCIDE OF SERBS STOPS NOW, THIS YEAR IN KOSOVO ! KOSOVO IS SERBIA!
If Kosovo is ready for independence based on GENOCIDE, then why isn't Abkhazia or Ossetia or Nagorno Karabakh or Transdniester or Basque region or Catalonia or Corsica or Scotland or Kurdistan in Turkey or Kurdistan in Iraq or Kurdistan in Iran or Western Sahara or Republic Srpska in Bosnia or Sir Lanka or Taiwan or Tibet or Pashtun Region in Pakistan or Kashmir or Jammu or PALESTINE!
#40 Princip
on March 10, 2008 at 1:29 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
Kosovo is not part of Serbia?!Please go study some history books and stop with the pathetic attempts at deception by such crass statements that have no truth.
The fact remains even the US, UK and France saw it right to reaffirm Serbia's soverignity in formulating and signing UN SC Resolution 1244 only 8 years ago as frothwrath stated above
"the commitment of all Member States to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia"
- Republic of Serbia being UN recongnised succesor state of FR Yugoslavia. Resolution 1244 stipulates that the international civil presence shall "provide an interim administration for Kosovo under which the people of Kosovo can enjoy substantial autonomy within the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, and which will provide transitional administration while establishing and overseeing the development of provisional democratic self-governing institutions to ensure conditions for a peaceful and normal life for all inhabitants of Kosovo." Elsewhere the words
"substantial autonomy" and "self-government" is reiterated.
In Resolution 1244 "self-governing" is mentioned 3 times, "self-government" 4 times, "self-administration" 1 time, "substantial autonomy" 3 times whereas neither "selfdetermination" nor "independence" is mentioned in the document. The "sovereignty" of FRY is mentioned 3 times.
Yet why did we intervene in Serbia's southern province back in 1999 and was it not all about "humanitarian intervention"? A regular to CiF on the real events;
"The death toll in Kosovo was in the hundreds before the start of the bombing campaign. It was around 5,000 by the end. Not quite the "genocide" that some people claimed, incidentally, but not a good precedent either.
I was working at Amnesty International during the Kosovo crisis. I first visited refugee camps in Albania and Macedonia during the conflict and then spent a year in Pristina seconded into the UN High Commissioner for Refugees. Tony Blair says that we "reversed ethnic cleansing" there, but I would not count the expulsion of over 100,000 Serbs and Roma from a province guarded by 40,000 Nato troops as a success."
- Conor Foley. April 20, 2007 3:30 PM. Oliver Kamm v Conor Foley: Should there be international intervention in Darfur?
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/t...
Pure spin & lies about WMG (Whereabouts of Mass Graves)was the reality of this earlier "illegal war". These manipulations were drawn upon in the false reasonings to again wage war against another sovereign state this time with the lie of WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction) while equally the earlier lie was just as much a lie over WMG (Whearabouts of Mass Graves).
#41 Princip
on March 10, 2008 at 1:30 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
So what has happened since that UN resolution in 1999 and the intervention to ensure human rights - 240,000 non-Albanians have been made refugee or internally displaced, 2004 saw a rampant attack on the remaining few non-Albanians and destruction of tens of Churches - many of which were UNESCO "protected" for all it was worth and a loss to world Heritage. Beyond which non-Albanians in some places live in barbed wire "ghettos" unable to even obtain food provision without UN guard while attacks occur on a daily basis with no investigation let alone apprehension of the attackers and their prosecution.
Read the article in March this year in Spiegal titled: The Failure of the West's 'Ostrich' Policy;
"The 124-page report blames the bleak prospects for the province's future on the UN administration, the NATO-led KFOR mission and the Europeans' "ostrich" policy. The study outlines mismanagement, corruption, organizational chaos and "organized crime gangs," which have infiltrated significant parts of the KFOR staff. The role of the United States is also deemed counterproductive: The IEP accuses Washington of being involved in helping criminals to flee, "sometimes openly" hindering European investigations into war crimes and training former KLA fighters -- an "obvious" breach of the UN resolution."
http://www.spiegel.de/international/0...
So why should the "International Community" reward such poor human rights record of the last 8 years with the creation of a state that has no historical, ethnic nor economic reason for being? Could anyone provide evidence of a "Kosovarian" ethnicity?
They need to sort out the mess that they in very large part have contributed too and accept the state of Serbia as it is and not hastily attempt to wash its hands by partitioning this UN member.
#42 Princip
on March 10, 2008 at 1:37 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
As for Kosovo Independence, well in evaluating Kosovo’s independence, it is also important, I think, to know that Kosovo is not gaining independence or even minimal self-government.
It will be run by an appointed High Representative and bodies appointed by the U.S., European Union and NATO. An old-style colonial viceroy and imperialist administrators will have control over foreign and domestic policy. It is similar to the absolute power held by L. Paul Bremer in the first two years of the U.S. occupation of Iraq. U.S. has merely consolidated its direct control of a totally dependent colony in the heart of the Balkans.
An International Civilian Representative (ICR) will be appointed by U.S. and E.U. officials to oversee Kosovo. This appointed official can overrule any measures, annul any laws and remove anyone from office in Kosovo. The ICR will have full and final control over the departments of Customs, Taxation, Treasury and Banking.
The E.U. will establish a European Security and Defense Policy Mission (ESDP) and NATO will establish an International Military Presence. Both these appointed bodies will have control over foreign policy, security, police, judiciary, all courts and prisons.
These bodies and the ICR will have final say over what crimes can be prosecuted and against whom; they can reverse or annul any decision made.
Serbia is just globalism’s first victim since annoys NATO/EU because it rejects the New World Order
#43 Uncle-Chip
on March 10, 2008 at 1:48 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
I would venture to add Serbia annoys NATO because it conducts an independent policy, does not want to join NATO and has an attractive geographic position
It is interesting to note that not one Albanian supporter serves to mention WHY Albanians have the majority in Kosovo. Perhaps no one wants to acknowledge the egregious behavior of Albanians, led by the KLA which is a KNOWN terrorist organization... wait, isn't their new president a "former" KLA member? For a world that seems to be fighting Islamic radicalism and terrorism, it would seem ironic that both the US and the EU would serve as beacons of terrorist support via their actions in Kosovo. I suppose that if a hispanic dominated state such as California wanted its independence one day, the EU should intervene and allow that to happen. Allowing Albanians and their terrorist organization affiliated leader the ability to control Kosovo, which is a historic SERBIAN area, would only cause immense conflict and strife in a region that does not need to see anymore.
After all that, the US fell for the old con trick that Muslims always use while Jihading ie siezing the lands of Infidels - pretending to be victims. Many MSM TV reports of that conflict are highly questionable - the market bombing, the cemetery bombing, the so called concentration camps. It is unfortunate that the internet was not as powerful as it these days, so that "atrocities" such as Qana in Lebanon, the "bombing" of the ambulances by Israel, can be exposed for the frauds they are.
Serbs have been the victim of ethnic cleansing to such an extent, that in less then 100 years, their number in Kosovo has fallen from 90% to less the 10%.
We are now facing the same Jihad as the Serbs had to for centuries.
#44 Truth N Justice
on March 10, 2008 at 1:49 p.m.(West Palm Beach, FL | Unverified Name)
Radical Islam v. Christian Serbs
Let's all get our heads lopped off!! It'll be Fun!
#45 LI_Boy
on March 10, 2008 at 2:06 p.m.(Albertson, NY | Unverified Name)
Very well said!
Kosovo, regardless of what the US and most of the EU may be saying, is not "independent." It is a sad "no man's land" of 2 million people, where more than 50% of its population is unemployed and its political leaders are in the pocket of narco-terrorists. Kosovo has no controle of its boarders, and it is under occupation by NATO and EU forces. And with Russia and China using their veto in the UN, Kosovo is still officially part of Serbia.
Europe will fight an uphill battle in trying to bring Kosovo into this century, given the high birth rate, infant mortality rate, crime and homicide rates, and, of course, the ethnic tensions between the Kosovo Albanians and the Kosovo Serbs (who seem to be in controle of most of Kosovo's resources and are loyal to Belgrade).
Further, the US has lost Serbia as a future NATO ally, choosing instead the much more unreliable Albanians. Russia is likely to gain a frim foothold in the heart of the Balkan Peninsula that has the potential to undermine American efforts of securing energy resources. Not to mention the huge political victory in Moscow, where Russia can paint itself as a "protector" of interantional law and the territorial integrity of nation states.
In the years to come, we shall see instability escalate in the whole region, especially in Bosnia and Macedonia. Also, the Kosovo Albanians will grow tired of NATO/EU presence, and begine to show outward hostility towards the west. And, of course, Russia will be less and less willing to cooperate with the West in solving real issues.
I hope it was worth it!!!!
#46 Enforcer
on March 10, 2008 at 2:13 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
All reasonable people who wish to know more about activities in Kosovo and Albania by Osama bin Laden and his crowd of Islamic Fundamentalist terrorists, allying themselves with the KLA --Kosovo Liberation Army-- from the summer of 1998 on.
In February 1998, when the Yugoslav police crackdown on the KLA began, the US State Department recognized the KLS as an international terrorist organization. This means, among other things, that US residents are not allowed to contribute funds, trade weapons or in any way support such organizations. Yet a Washington Post article of May 26, 1998 indicates Washington understands that funds are flowing directly to the KLA. By the summer, the KLA-Osama connection was clearly established, even as the US was bombing Osama's Afghanistan installations with Tomahawks in retribution for the embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania.
http://www.siri-us.com/backgrounders/...
as well as archive of newspaper articles of KLA Terror & Ethnic Cleansing
http://www.siri-us.com/backgrounders/...
For the Kosovo Albanians’ ties to international crime, see the articles by Michel Chossudovsky at http://www.globalresearch.ca
The EU has capitulated to a bunch of terrorists thugs and opened the door for every disgruntled ethnic group that wishes to persue its own narrow minded terratorial ambitions. And in the process they are willing to use brute force to coerce their own people so they can portray their movement as a popular nationalist movement. This was no nationalist movement. It was a land grab by a group of thugs who had fled their own homeland to escape the brutality of the Hoxha regime' and now, rather than return to rebuild the lands of their ancestors, they find it easier to take away the property of the very nation that gave them sanctuary. The EU/USA by its shameful actions has condoned this dagger to the back of Serbia and abroggated the charter on which the U N was founded.
Christian Churches Destroyed By Albanian Jihad Fanatics 1/2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAYlBL...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaqThr... (The Muslim Albanians- Heroin smugglers)
#47 hmmm
on March 10, 2008 at 2:20 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
Princip if that's truth then the expression of self-determination as many here claim means nothing at all!
The Kosovo “Declaration of Independence” meekly accepts — indeed “welcomes” — all these blatant encroachments upon Kosovo "sovereignty." If words are to retain their sense, it would be more accurate to label it a “Declaration of Dependence.”
#48 G
on March 10, 2008 at 2:36 p.m.(La Grange Park, IL | Unverified Name)
To American Soldier:
"...We weren't preventing anything. The genocide wasn't about to happen. It was happening. We stopped it in progress."
PLEASE!!!! Stopped what in progress? Christian Serbs responding to decades of Muslim Albanian terrorism? You use the term "Kosova" when even the international community still refers to it as Kosovo. The UN has refuted the original fabricated mess of hundreds of thousands of dead Albanians. I've talked to many Serbs in the US who have fled their home in KosovO as refugees, and their story is very different from yours my friend.
Furthermore, thanks for protecting the Serbian civilians in Kosovo. Because of the watchful eye of the democratic, moral authority of the world, over 250,000 have been expelled, several thousand killed, 130-150 Holy Shrines destroyed, and 80% of Serbian cemeteries desecrated.
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!!
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/art...
There are countless more like this. Read for yourself...
#49 bostjan
on March 10, 2008 at 2:39 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
I definitely agree with Lil-Boy and Princip that any engagement in the Balkans is disastrous.
Currently, the Czech policemen try to separate the enraged Serbs and enraged Kosovars at the problematic border crossings. Brave people, and doing ungrateful work. Why ungrateful? Because they will earn hatred of both sides - such are the wages of engagement in the Balkans.
The Balkan peninsula contains a toxic mixture of ethnic and religious hatreds, some of which date back to the times of the Byzantian empire. America has yet tasted first bitter drops of that poison. I am not happy with that; I sincerely wish that the Americans avoided the regional hell entirely. They chose to dive in...
Every single superpower that ever engaged in Balkans got its fingers burnt and made no lasting allies. The Habsburg attempt to extend control over Bosnia resulted in death of the 400-year-old empire in 4 years. Italians lost one war there. The British engagement in the Greek civil war was nasty, costy and no, Greece was not a reliable ally of Britain after, though it was saved from the Reds (partly) by British effort and blood.
Even the warmongering Soviets under Stalin avoided direct confrontation with Croat communist Tito in the 1950s, because the prize was not simply worth the risk.
And humanitarian hawks as I like to call them,on here,are celebrating,excuse me if I refuse to join you
#50 right on
on March 10, 2008 at 2:44 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
G, very good observation by this alleged American soldier.
"Kosovo" is a Serbian place name, more fully "kosovo polje", meaning the 'field (or plain) of blackbirds'. "Kosovo Polje" lies just outside the city of Prishtina.
Ornithology lesson: Among North Americans, Australians, and South Africans, only ornithologists can identify the species in question. Kosovo's "black bird" is no crow, nor raven, no starling nor grackle, but "turdus merula", European cousin of the North American rusty-bellied thrush ("turdus migratorius"), which Yanks call the "robin".
In Britain and Ireland "robin" is the name of another species, "erithacus rubecula".
(The "four and twenty 'blackbirds' baked in a pie", of the English rhyme, were of the species "merula", in Serbian called "kos". From this term "kosovo" is the derived possessive adjective.
Like America's harbinger of spring, the black bird called "kos" in Serbian language sings sweetly in the springtime and early summer.
For North Americans the feel of the Serbo-Croatian place name "Kosovo" can only be had from a free translation, "Field of Robins".
Albanians have borrowed the word from the Serbs, whose once overwhelming majority was driven down, especially since the Congress of Berlin, by savage aggression from Albanians incited then and in WW I by Austria-Hungary and Germany, in World War II by Mussolini's puppet Albanians, and after WW II by the discriminatory ethnic cleansing of the Stalinist dictator Josip Broz.
Native Indian place names in America have no meaning in English: e.g. "Michigan" means nothing in English. In Ojibwa "mishshikamaa" means "it is a big lake".
Just so the place names of Ireland have transparent meaning in Gaelic but are meaningless tags in the colonialist English, e.g. "Dublin" is Gaelic "dubh lin" 'black pool', and "Kildare" is "cil dara" 'church of the oak', Just so the names of the Serbian province of Kosovo are clear Serbian formations, but have no meaning in the Albanian language.
Proof of the Serbian origin of the name and the loanword status of the immigrant Albanian term is that the word "kosovo" has a clear etymology to anyone who knows a Slavic language, while Albanian "Kosova" is an opaque, meaningless place name in the Albanian language.
Kosovo is Serbian.
#51 Genti
on March 10, 2008 at 2:58 p.m.(Utrecht, Netherlands | Unverified Name)
To FactsMaker,
To Dream On,
Yes I am Albanian! However, I can tell you in all sincerity that I really look forward to when democratic forces will rule Belgrade, instead of the 'old communist jackets'. You should too!
Even after Mr. Tashkovich (see link below just to find out who he is) told you AMBO did not have anything to do with Kosova you again try to find something to link the two?! Wake up guys!
http://www.johnson.cornell.edu/alumni...
'Get Real' either you are keeping the volume of the stereo of your SUV to high to hear any news, or you're high on Coca Cola and cannot make sense of what is happening around you. Serb authorities had to surrender Milosevic, because there was an ultimatum and a linked benefit in international aid in the billions of dollars. Kostunica was not a happy man but his hand was forced. Further he just wanted power and Milosevic was a liability he had to get rid of!
As for the Kosovar Albanians indicted they all went themselves to the Hague as soon as they learned of the charges against them. Haradinaj even resigned from his position as Prime Minister to go to the Hague. That is showing real respect for international law and international institutions. Serbia has still to hand over Mladic who has been hiding in Belgrade for years now! And so that you know Serbia has been found in breach of international law by the International Court of Justice in the case brought against it by Bosnia and Herzegovina for its failure to prevent genocide in Srebrenica and for failure to cooperate with the Tribunal (ICTY). Now which part of international law you want to apply to Serbia and what to the rest of the world? Or should we rewrite it altogether to suit Serbia's arguments?
'Get real', to whom do you pledge allegiance? Serbia or the USA? It is deplorable to see your low attacks on 'American Soldier'. If I were you I would be thankful to them! If there is finally some peace in the Balkans is because NATO is there, otherwise the hotheads of Belgrade would not have stopped before anything!
'Can't fool me' no one can fool a fool (see rants above)! So you're absolutely right and your rants make perfect sense coming from you!
'Red in blue', I am not sure whether you're still sleeping or awake. Kosova declared its independence on 17 February! It is almost a month! Many States have recognized it already (http://kosovothanksyou.com/). Whatever Serbia says about it does not matter. Indeed, if self-determination is to have any sense that's how it should be.
#52 Genti
on March 10, 2008 at 3 p.m.(Utrecht, Netherlands | Unverified Name)
'Red in blue', you say: "NATO has played midwife at the birth of a fascist pseudo-state run by narco-terrorists." The simple truth is that NATO prevented a fascist State, Serbia under Milosevic, from slaughtering powerless Albanian civilians in Kosova. The Republic of Kosova is a State committed to respect the human rights of all its citizens, independent of their ethnicity and is run by freely elected leaders. Narco-terrorists are powerful in Belgrade where the likes of Legija (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milorad_...), a former special forces commander (Red Berets) who committed war crimes alongside Arkan in Bosnia, Croatia and Kosova, a member of the Zemun clan (trafficking drugs, weapons and human beings) killed your then president Ivan Stambolic (with Milosevic's consent) and afterwards your prime minister, Zoran Dindic (again with Milosevic's consent and probably with Kostunica's too). That shows you how powerful and ruthless mafia is in Serbia.
As for civilization that was again shown recently in the attacking and burning of several foreign embassies (another sign of respect for international law) and the burning alive of own citizens in the act and the hooligan type devastations of the centre of Belgrade. One should add the burning and attacking of UNMIK personnel and buildings in Kosova.
You probably won't believe it but I deplore the state of affairs in Serbia, before and nowadays. The way forward for all Balkan countries is Europe, integration, and respect for human rights. They should be cooperating and trying to undertake all necessary reforms and steps to fulfill the requirements for their own sake. Unfortunately, Serbia seems to be on the wrong track again. Hopefully with these upcoming elections things will take a turn for good and that real democratic forces in Serbia will finally win them convincingly. If I can put it this way: Only then the skies will finally open and Serbs will be able to hear the joyful tunes of the 9th symphony of Beethoven!
#53 Centurion1
on March 10, 2008 at 3:08 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
I do not know about American Soldier experience yet it stirs a wide range of emotion and debate as seen here on these posts. But for what other than venting ones frustrations and views.
I have served two tours in Kosovo with the US Military and I can tell you the following as factual:
1. Almost all facets and levels of the provisional government in Kosovo are corrupt. In fact its the worst I've ever seen and I've had to deal with some pretty corrupt governments during my career.2. Supervised independence or even full independence will not improve the miserable lives of the ordinary people of Kosovo. Partly because of what I've listed as fact "1"., and partly because it will take decades of imense amounts of foreign aid throughout economy in order to bring Kosovo into a functioning state that wouldn't need foreign assistance for its survival.
3. Ethnic cleansing is still a common occurence in Kosovo but, this time its the ethnic Albanians ethnically cleansing the Serbs, Roma, Ashkali, Croatians, and Turk minorities through intimidation and at times outright force. I have personally witnessed this on many occasions.
4. No amount of foreign investment will provide enough jobs for the amount of unemployed people in Kosovo. The only way for Kosovo to maintain stability is for the EU to open its borders for an influx of foreign workers from Kosovo.
5. Islamic extremism is on the rise in Kosovo. KFOR soldiers have been attacked in Gjilan, Ferizaj, and Prizren when I was there. You just won't see or hear about it in the news. More Mosques have been built in Kosovo in the last five years than schools, roads, health clinics, and all other santitation project combined. Compliments of Muslim charities from the Middle East.
6. Mass graves of Kosovo Serbs and Roma have been found during my rotation and reported to the UN. Yet nothing has been done. Why? When we posed the question to our UN contacts in Pristina they replied: "During the transitional stage of Kosovo this would be destablizing. We'll wait until there is a final resolution before we proceed." All those journalists interested in a real story...start looking in around Novo Brdo.
#54 Centurion1
on March 10, 2008 at 3:08 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
7. The US Government along with key EU allies never had any intention of allowing Serbia a fair opportunity to negotiate with the Kosovar provisional government on the possibilities of a workable settlement that might have been permanent. I was party to a couple of meetings where US Government officials point blank told the Kosovar representatives that no matter what, the US will support independence and that going to these conferences in Vienna were just to give a favorable impression on the world opinion.These are the facts. Some people might be outraged and some might be supprised however it really doesn't matter in the final analysis of all things considered. Superpowers will do what they want.Kosovo independence will do nothing for stability of the region, in fact, the opposite will occur.The Kosovar Albanians are now joyous they will have a new nation but, when all the partying ends and the dust clears, all that will exist is another backward, poverty stricken,underdeveloped, internationally protected country in an area of hostile neighbors thats todays news story and tomorrows breeding ground for extremism and resentment
#55 unbelievable
on March 10, 2008 at 3:19 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
http://www.fantompowa.net/Flame/yugos...
It's incredible how this Albanina guy comes to this site to repeat the same lies over and over again how the Serbs tried to exterminate every other ethnic groups in the Balkans or something similar to that lie The simple and undisputed fact is that all orthodox Christian nations in the Balkans are allied with the Serbs against the muslims: the Montenegrins, Macedonians, Greeks, Romanians and Bulgarians were all part of the great alliance with the Serbs that drove the Turks away and liberated the Balkans. So when exactly did the Serbs tried to exterminate all those nations when they helped those nations to liberate themselves from muslim rule????
The Roma fought on the Serb side against the albanians. Even the non-albanian muslims in kosovo prefer the serbs over albanian rule: the Cherkess preferred to be evacuated to Russia rather than to live under fellow muslim albanian rule. All of albanias neighbours: the Macedonians, Montenegrins and Greeks have never fought against the Serbs only against the albanians who are trying to exterminate all non-muslims in the Balkans.
You are obviously the only ethnic supremacist on this site. I do not have any Serb relations at all and don't speak a single word Serb. And I'm a Roman Catholic while the Serbs are orthodox Christians, but since they have always fought against people who think that I'm a dirty infidel I happen to agree with them.
The albanians did side with the nazis, they had their own SS Skanderbeg division which in Kosovo participated in gathering of the Kosovo Jews and sending them to the nazi death camp Bergen-Belsen.
(my source is Chris Bishop's book: "Hitler's Foreign Divisions")
#56 RickDaStick
on March 10, 2008 at 3:39 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
This article is now relevant as it was in 1999.
Forty reasons why the Serbs are not the new Nazis and the Kosovars are not the new Jews:
By Julie Burchill
Ffrom guardian.co.uk
1) Because the Nazis did not put Jews on the train to Israel, as the Serbs are now putting ethnic Albanian Kosovars on the train to Albania.
2) Because we're the ones fighting alongside the Luftwaffe and the Serbs are the ones whom the Luftwaffe is bombing.
3) Because the Serbs tend to be really good- looking, especially the women.
4) Because pop stars don't, and never will, dress up as Serbs.
5) Because Serbs don't feature in pornography.
6) Because Dirk Bogarde never played a Serb.
7) Because my father taught me never to kiss a Nazi, whereas I've certainly snogged a few Serbs in my time.
8) Because Robin Cook says they are.
9) Because Clinton is a liar.
10) Because Milosevic doesn't have a moustache.
11) Because the Kosovan Liberation Army is a terrorist organisation that has been killing innocent Serbs for years, whereas the Jews were model citizens.
12) Because, if the Serbs were really Nazis, the Times, Daily Mail and their like would be right behind them, judging from their track record during the Thirties.
13) Because it wasn't the Serbs who fought with the Nazis in Yugoslavia during the second world war - it was the Croats and the Muslims. (Nazi Muslims! What an absolutely mind- blowingly terrifying concept!)
14) Because, if they were Nazis, the US wouldn't be fighting them but funding them, like all those old pigs it props up in Latin America.
15) Tony Benn doesn't back no Nazis! Come outside and say that!
16) Because anyone who knows anything about European history before 1945 backs the Serbs.
17) Because Volkswagen recently broadcast a commercial on German television that compared the thrill of driving its latest model to being a Nazi invading Czechoslovakia. Serbia has never, does not and never will make car commercials about the thrill of going into Kosovo. (Just a guess!)
18) Because, if you make a film saying that it was a real hoot being in a Nazi concentration camp, you get lots of Oscars, whereas if you decided to make a film saying that it was a real hoot being in an Albanian refugee camp, Tony Blair would have you shot under some arcane wartime law which Cherie has just discovered on the statute books.
19) Because those ultra-Lefties who want the Serbs bombed are always the ones who are on the side that's against the Jews.
#57 RickDaStick
on March 10, 2008 at 3:39 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
20) Because the Serbs have a bittersweet sense of humour, whereas the Nazis, being Germans, were utterly humourless. After all, can you really imagine the Krauts during the time of the Allied bombardment going around with a bullseye and the word "TARGET" painted on their faces?
21) "I had an uncle who played/For Red Star Belgrade" Billy Bragg. Billy Bragg would never have boasted about having a footballing Nazi for an uncle! Come outside and say that! (Again!)
22) Because Tariq Ali, Louis de Bernières, Alan Clark and I haven't been interned yet. (Give it time, though.)
23) Because the Serbs were the only people in Yugoslavia who never persecuted the Jews.
24) "Bill and Tony sitting up a tree/K.I.S.S.I.N.G!" Because Blair can't be trusted when he gazes into Billy Bob's big blue eyes and the hormones kick in.
25) Because, if Milosevic was a Nazi, Baroness Thatcher would be having tea with him in Surrey.
26) Because no one ever went on holiday to Nazi Germany (except for Unity Mitford.)
27) Because the IRA won't send an honour guard to Milosevic's funeral.
28) Because the Jews didn't indulge in personal vendettas as they went into the countries that welcomed them as refugees, let alone get to the point of shooting each other at point blank range, as two Kosovar men did in Calais last week while they were waiting to be put on the boat to Britain.
29) Because the Jews didn't growl at women on the streets of their host countries, as Albanian men seem wont to.
30) Because the Serbs have a really cool salute and the Nazis had a silly one.
31) Because, unlike Nazis - "And Goebbels has no balls at all" -'Milosevic" does not rhyme with anything rude.
32) Because the British tabloids are the first people since the Nazis to use the word "Slav" as a term of abuse.
33) Because the KLA is funded by drug-trafficking, while the nearest the German Jews ever got to drugs was chicken soup.
34) Because the German Jews didn't want to annex part of Germany and call it Israel-On- The-Rhine.
35) Because last year the British Immigration Office decreed that the Kosovars were not a distinct racial group. (And it's been a damned long time since anyone said that about the Jews.)
36) Because clean-limbed, dirty-minded little WASP girls don't grow up dreaming of marrying a big, handsome, sexy, intellectual Kosovar.
37) Because Germany has agreed to take 40,000 Kosovar Albanian refugees - that's "take", not "kill".
38) Because the Greeks sympathise with the Serbs - and the Greeks always back the right side.
39) Because Israel sympathises with the Kosovars, and Israel always backs the wrong side. (Lovely shot of that Israeli jet flying cheek-to-cheek with the Luftwaffe, lads!)
40) Because Nazis don't win wars - and Serbs don't lose them.
#58 Get Real
on March 10, 2008 at 4 p.m.(Goodyear, AZ | Unverified Name)
HAHA, Certi is funny. If you call albanian propaganda (Ruder-Finn - look it up) news, i'll pass and stay stupid, you got room in your club? That's right, coca-cola, not "COKE" as in your case, or is it Heroin?
Mr. Tashkovich, gave his opinion, did not prove anything, just stated his opinion. Besides he said himself, he and his family are a part of the AMBO, a little biased in my book, but he is entitled to his opinion and I respect that.
My allegience is to the USA, born and raised. A little history, My great grandfather died in WW1 as an ally, my grandfather spent a majority of WW2 in a Nazi camp (as an ally), My father flew an American flag until the day he died. Give us a little history of your Albanian ancestry and their loyalties during these wars? You want me to answer that? Oh and by the way, when were American soldiers ever in battle on the ground in Kosovo, for us to fear for their lives. American troops were never in harms way in Kosovo.
Kostunica had nothing to do with handing over Milosevic, "The initial investigation into Milošević faltered for lack of hard evidence prompting the Serbian Prime Minister Zoran Đinđić to send him to The Hague to stand trial for alleged war crimes instead." as they danced on the billions of dollars they got for turning him in. Trying to re-write history again, I see. If you want to talk Facts, have some, if not, Disneyland has a forum for you.
I will bet my life, if you tell the Serbs "give us Mladic so we can put him on the same bus to the Hague as Ceku, Thaci, Tudjman, Izetbegovic, etc.." they would pay for the gas. Haradinaj was replaced by who?
I am waiting to hear your response, but PLEASE use facts not fiction. Until then, I will be listening to my radio in my SUV, with a COKE AND A SMILE!
#59 Genti
on March 10, 2008 at 4:35 p.m.(Utrecht, Netherlands | Unverified Name)
Centurion1,
Welcome to the ranks of the prejudiced anti-Kosovar League. Everyone reading your statements should certainly take them for the truth for you have seen it all, right? In your tours with the American Military..on two times...Well, the American Military usually does not go on tours or picnics but on missions. And you were even involved or participated in high profile talks? On what capacity? Usually military people and civilian people do not mix? Or you have a mixed status? Military people stay in their garrisons and don't get involved in politics...but of course you are the exception!
You bring seven points. Here the response to you and to the other un-Princip-led and prejudiced persons passing judgment and expressing expectations over a State that is barely a month old!
1. Democracy comes from within. Now that the government will be liable to the people of Kosova directly (alongside international observers) corruption is bound to fall. Corruption exists even in established democracies and can never be eradicated. Kosova cannot be expected to be the least corrupt State immediately upon its establishment.
2. Independence will give a new impetus to development! As an experienced man with a lot of experience over your shoulders you should know that security and status are necessary preconditions for development!
3. Many Serbs fled Kosova fearing that returning Kosovar Albanians would retaliate for their losses during the campaign of ethnic cleansing. Nobody drove them out! In fact, those who did not shed Albanian blood had nothing to fear! The rest should remain in Serbia! Only there they don't have to fear facing judgment for war crimes committed in Kosova.
4. Both foreign investment and integration into EU will turn Kosova into a prosperous State. They are complementary!
#60 Genti
on March 10, 2008 at 4:35 p.m.(Utrecht, Netherlands | Unverified Name)
5. Islamic extremism is a fear many try to use in dissuading EU countries and the USA from supporting Kosova. It is an argument that won't and cannot stick. Albanians generally are by far the most supportive people of EU and USA in the whole of Balkans.
6. Mass graves were found during your rotation? What was it? Rotation? Tour? Picnic? Apparently you were rotating too much instead of fulfilling your mission, if you had any?! Of course besides being an interlocutor of the highest level you were also a forensic expert analyzing human remains, right?! Indeed, many mass graves were found after the war. Of Kosovar Albanians of all ages and both genders massacred by the Serb para-military, military and police forces during their rampage in 98-99.
7. US and EU did not allow Serbia a fair opportunity to negotiate or dictate? Probably as a military man you might not see the difference between the two! However, to answer your concern Kosova's independence will bring stability. That would happen sooner if Serbia accepts the reality and ceases and desists from interfering in the internal affairs of the new State. Let it not be forgotten that there are minorities on both sides of the border!
Long Live Kosova and its vital people! Thank you NATO, EU and USA!
#61 Genti
on March 10, 2008 at 5:16 p.m.(Utrecht, Netherlands | Unverified Name)
'Unbelievable',
Check these Jewish websites to see what the Albanians did to save the Jews during WWII:
http://thenewjew.wordpress.com/2007/1...
http://www.prlog.org/10047652-united-...
The religious card won't help your argument much. First, Croats, mainly Roman Catholic hate the guts of Serbs and vice versa? Why is that? They're both Christian? So, the Balkan problem is not a religious issue after all! As we're on this point I'd like to add that all neighbors should look to Albania on the issue of religious tolerance and learn from it!
To Dream On:
Tashkovich is the FYROM minister of foreign investment in Gruevski's government. Why are you???
With all due respect your history is of little use to me. My grandfather also fought against the Italian fascists in 1939, but there is no need to boast about that publicly. Albanians fought against the Italians and the Germans in WWII, that is public knowledge. But apparently you don't have much time to read.
You see, if you even read my post you would understand that at no point I said Kostunica handed over Milosevic. Dzindic did and paid for it with his life! What I said is that Kostunica did not oppose it as among others he would become the next president! But after that Kostunica and Dzindic fell apart over cooperation with the Tribunal (ICTY) and other issues. Evidently, the person connected to his former boss (Milosevic) and the mafia clan of Zemun is alive! So, Dzindic is dead (killed), Kostunica is alive and kicking everyone who does not share his viewpoint!
Your last comment is totally out of target! Albanians do not make the indictments in the Hague. The Prosecution does! And that organ chose to charge the persons it did. There is no legal obligation to surrender any of the persons you have mentioned, as they are not charged (Izetbegovic died before the indictment could be issued) while Serbia should have long ago surrendered Mladic. Maybe you can give him a ride to the Hague on your SUV? As fare he can tell you his experiences!
Last but not least, CHERISH your life, don't bet it on things you don't know about! And keep on dreaming! And dream big!
#62 Get Real
on March 10, 2008 at 6:34 p.m.(Goodyear, AZ | Unverified Name)
Do you mean "who" am I? I am the guy that has been trying to keep you honest and to tell you the truth, you are not helping any. Can you answer my questions, enlighten me.
I find it deplorable, how you responded to Centurion1, is he not a part of the same military as American Soldier. Or is it because he speaks the truth, something your posts seem to lack. You should thank him for your freedom not dispute his evaluation.
ok, so there were 100 Albanians that were saving jews, what was the rest of the population doing? Let me guess, humanitarian activities for uncle Adolf. I don't know why I answer your post, since your selective in which questions you answer.
I am not boasting, don't have too, and I don't need your respect. Don't ask me where my loyalties are and then be demeaning when you don't like the answer. Something you will need to learn if you want to have an educated discussion.
Oh, so since Serbs didn't stop Milosevic from going to the Hague, they are guilty of self interest. You are starting to sound like a child.
Sure, got plenty of room, third row seating, he can sit IN my car next to the rest of them. Don't worry though, I have a special place for you on my lap.
"Long Live Kosovo and its vital people! Thank you NATO, EU and USA!" can we get a check now!
#63 albi
on March 10, 2008 at 6:59 p.m.(Santa Clara, CA | Unverified Name)
Serbia became independent from Turkey with Russian help. The Ottoman government defeated Serb rebels in 1876, however 2 years later Russia went to war for them and handed them independence in a silver platter.
Serbia has been creating problems for the world ever since. In 1912 they started the Balkan Wars. In 1914 a Serb terrorist group killed emperor Franz Ferdinand AND his wife in Sarajevo. World War 1 was essentially a continuation of the Serb wars of expansion.
When World War 1 ended, Serbs seemed wildly successful in achieving their territorial expansion objectives. They enjoyed the support of Russia as well as the support of the Western nations. That remained unchanged until the break-up of Yugoslavia.
So what is the reason for Western states ditching their one time Serb proteges and World War allies?
Some refuse to believe the simplest, the most common sense answer to this question. If you are a Serb, it must be hard to accept the truth. Alternative theories must be sought.
Are Americans after a nonexistent oil pipeline, as Serbs and their sympathizers say? Are Serbs unwilling to allow pipelines to transit in their territory? Would Serbia threaten a pipeline that goes through Albania, instead of Serbia?
The answer is much simpler. Serbs have miscalculated in these recent games of high stakes poker. They have miscalculated because they have an inflated sense of their own worth. First they thought that Yugoslavia was too valuable for the West to recognize independence of Slovenia and Croatia. And then they thought that the West would never intervene to save a couple million worthless Albanians.
The problem with Serbs' attitude was that all these western governments have archives that go back hundreds of years. They have records of Serb crimes. They are fed up with Serbs. They have come to understand Serbs the way we Albanians do. That's how we came to 1999.
Independence, after 1999, was a done deal. To make matters worse, Serbs showed no remorse, no regret. Refrigerator trucks filled with Albanians were pulled out of Danube, yet the Serbs look for reasons why the West hates them.
It is pointless for me to argue with people like Factsfinder, for instance, who say that Kosovo became Albanian during the past century. Even Serbs themselves, the grown up ones, will concede that Kosovo was essentially Albanian in 1912 (and then they will go on to say that they lost a battle there in 1389). Or Kumbaya, who says that there is unrestricted Albanian immigration into Kosovo. The immigration of Albanians has been the other way, from Kosovo to Albania in the 20's and 30's, and from Kosovo to Switzerland, Germany, USA, and everywhere else during "Tito's golden age".
For the neutral readers who wish to learn facts, please go to a library. Don't read these amateurish kindergarden pieces.
#64 Get Real
on March 10, 2008 at 7:20 p.m.(Goodyear, AZ | Unverified Name)
For the neutral readers who wish to learn facts, please go to a library. Don't read these amateurish kindergarden pieces" including yours. Ferdinand was an arch duke not an emperor, he was killed by Gavrilo Princip, a 16 year old "Terrorist" haha. So your war, was not for expansion? Kind of funny, since you had someone else fighting for your independence. You want to know why the Serbs are the bad guys. Because they stood up for themselves and didn't have a PR firm like Ruder-Finn helping them like Croatia, Bosnia, and Kosovo. You want some truth?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29y1L9...
#65 Ian
on March 10, 2008 at 8:16 p.m.(Sydney, Australia | Unverified Name)
I don't think that there will be any credible comment from both sides. I understand this as a excise in debating. It's not black and white is gray. What's right for Balkans. Depends? Are we pursuing stability, chaos or controlled instability. Most of what the West was doing made things worse. They intervene in Bosnia too late. On the other hand Kosovo is pure secession. Same thing as Baskia, Kurds ... They punished Serbs in Kosovo for sins in Bosnia. Albanians on the other hand want great Albania. All is about interests not principles. I don't use word democracy as the most misused word in the world today.
#66 G
on March 10, 2008 at 9:43 p.m.(Westchester, IL | Unverified Name)
Genti: "Serbia has been creating problems for the world ever since. In 1912 they started the Balkan Wars. In 1914 a Serb terrorist group killed emperor Franz Ferdinand AND his wife in Sarajevo. World War 1 was essentially a continuation of the Serb wars of expansion."
This statement in utterly laughable. The Austro-Hungarian (AH) empire was a land grabbing dictatorship. AH occupied Bosnia and was beginning to sanction Serbia economically. Instead of twiddling his thumbs, the Serbian King established economic and military relations with the Western nations in Europe, namely France. France began to build all of Serbia's military equipment, while AH was basically left out to dry. A Bosnian Serb named Gavrilo Princip and his group, which actually included on Muslim, took matters into their own hands and revolted against what was an oppressive regime. Unlike Muslims, Serbs didn't look for pity, nor did they look to act as a never-ending victim. Serbians have historically been guilty of one thing and that is stubbornness. They never stopped for over 500 years against the Turks, lost over 50% of their male population fighting against tyranny in WW1, CHOSE (bolje rat vego pakt!) to fight against the Nazis, and now they choose not to give in the corrupted Western powers.
albi: "Refrigerator trucks filled with Albanians were pulled out of Danube"
Rest assured, we'll always get one of those stories that no human being can stand to question. John Laughland questioned it here:
http://www.antiwar.com/spectator/spec...
How about those Trepca mines too:
http://www.mediamonitors.net/gowans1....
I hope the Albanians don't get too comfy with their new western allies. The "moral warriors" will find a way out of your friendship as soon as their national interests change.
Also,rest assured that the Serbs will be back in Kosovo. They have outlasted many empires, and they'll outlast this one.
#67 Get Real
on March 10, 2008 at 10:21 p.m.(Goodyear, AZ | Unverified Name)
From what I have read (while listening to loud "ethnic cleansing" music in my SUV, while drinking a Coke),Gavrilo was not a part of the plot to assasinate Ferdinand. He overheard the assasination plot and wanted to join. He was turned down. After the group was thwarted of their plan, Gavrilo took matters into his own hands, the rest is history (unless you are Genti or Albi - their recollection of history is different than ours). This seems to be the most common rendition I have heard, could be wrong, could be right.
#68 LI_Boy
on March 11, 2008 at 12:06 a.m.(Albertson, NY | Unverified Name)
There are no "clean hands" in the Balkans. The Western media's characterization of the Serbs as "evil" and the Albanians as "innocent" fails to put events of the past 10 years into historical context.
Unless a dialoge is reestablihsed between Serbia and the Kosovo Albanian leadership, the future will be quite problematic.
I strongly believe the Albanians of Kosovo will one day, in the not so distant future, turn against the US once they come to view their "country" as being occupied by NATO. Kosovo has the potential of becomming what Lebanon was in the 1980s.
Tensions will escalate in the entire region, especially in Bosnia and Macedonia. Integration into NATO will do little to help the situation. In Bosnia, the Serbian Republic, and very possibly the Croatian enclave in Hertsigovina, will seek independence. In Macedonia, the north-west Albanian district may demand more autonomy, setting the stage for a possible declaration of independence. The situation in Macedonia is complicated due to its political problems with Greece and Bulgaria, specifically the lingering issue of Slav-Macedonian ethnicity.
We'll see what happens!
#69 Real facts!...
on March 11, 2008 at 3:07 a.m.(None, Austria | Unverified Name)
to fackfinder:
..Kosova was never Serbia, please try harder read more about history and find some more facks, you are so wrong my friend!!! Albanian are for centuries in these areas (Balkans) whereas Serbs came there only on the 7TH Century. So, if you claim about whose land is that, then it is Albanians. Please try harder so that you dont make stupid mistakes!!!!!
#70 Maria Amadei Ashot
on March 11, 2008 at 9:56 a.m.(London, United Kingdom | Unverified Name)
Thank you for an excellent, factual and restrained report. Bravissimi, University of Washington & A. Ganapathiraju: your impressive reporting eclipses a great deal of what appears in the major media outlets.
Claims that "Albanians were in these parts" before the 7th century are specious: we all have ancestors who were "somewhere" three thousand, four thousand years ago, fifty thousand years ago. That's to be established by the DNA record. It is not a basis for "statehood." The written historical records of nations do matter. Some nations have recorded histories that go back quite a few thousand years; we know for a fact that the great Asian cultures had organized themselves as states with governments and laws as far back as ten thousand years ago. And those that have remained viable after all those years do have certain prerogatives & authority that others have not been able to claim yet.
Thus, in 1843, Hawai'i was a sovereign nation, recognized as such by Great Britain and France. And? What happened? Since the US supports the aspirations of Albanians in Kosovo, why not of Puerto Ricans in Puerto Rico? Who has the better claim? Why shouldn't Alaska, for example, separated from the main 48 states by Canada, mostly sparsely settled and with substantial enclaves of natives, not ask for sovereignty?
To all those who would defend a sloppier, less precise interpretation of the past, one driven by expediency or flavor-of-the-month sympathies, rather than adherence to actual executed international statutes, such as the Helsinki Final Act of 1975: imagine the kind of world that would result!
To those well familiar with US history & its land grab methods, the long shameful history of treaties signed by Washington DC with the leaders of First Nations -- and then simply shredded -- or of the pattern of taking the minerals out of the lands owned by "tribes" -- and then not paying the billions owed by the US Dept of the Interior: how is this different? Isn't this just the same idea as the worst excesses of 'eminent domain', only on a much bigger scale, and in a completely different part of the world? One over which Americans in the US have remotely zero jurisdiction?
This whole episode around Kosovo, including the 100+ churches and monasteries that have been burned & destroyed since 1999 while UNMIK & K-FOR stood by, doing nothing but collecting their paychecks, has nothing to do with the sovereignty of Albanians -- they have a country -- and everything to do with oil, pipelines, the European market for street drugs, the slave trade and other lucrative but ultimately destructive ways of making money. Sure, Mr. Cheney approves. Should you?
#71 G
on March 11, 2008 at 10:06 a.m.(La Grange Park, IL | Unverified Name)
To Real Facts:
Your seem to bury yourself with that argument because it makes no sense. Albanians were in the Balkans for centuries, but the Serbs came there in the 7th century? There were plenty of people in the Balkans in the early centuries, but none of them seem to be laying claim to someone else's land as the Albanians do. Of course it is not just Kosovo, but sections of northern Greece, Macedonia, Montenegro, etc, are all part of the so called greater Albania plan put forth at the League of Prizren in the late 1800s.
There are plenty of books and internet sites that cite the historical record of Kosovo being Serbian, so I will leave them to everyone's disposal. However, I will point out the the very fact that the existence of Serbian holy shrines that date back to the 1100s or before explicitly chronicle the historical existence and evolution of the Serbian dynasties within Kosovo. Building records and the sheer iconography of the Serbian Churches and Monasteries in Kosovo are visual and verifiable proof of the continued existence of the Serbian civilization in Kosovo. Furthermore, Prizren was the Serbian capital beginning in the 14th century. Albanians were given settlements only by the Ottoman Empire, but their population was still a small minority. Also, Albanians are not connected to Kosovo as the dominant ethnic group. They had tribes that settled there in accordance with the Ottomans but nothing more.
Sadly, though, even one of the greatest Albanian supporters US Senator Biden attests to this. His recent statement that ancestral rights do not guarantee territorial sovereignty is quite the counter punch to your argument. Especially since it is from one of your best friends. :(
... continued...
#72 G
on March 11, 2008 at 10:07 a.m.(La Grange Park, IL | Unverified Name)
... continued...
As far as negotiations: they don't work with Albanians or any other friends of the West. Serbia came to the negotiating table last year with concrete offers of autonomy, which I personally think was too much to begin with. Autonomy is detrimental to multi-ethnic societies in Europe because it lays a foundation for separation from the mother state. The spawns of this type of separation are usually mono ethnic states that are in constant turmoil with opposing ethnicities surrounding them. Yugoslavia was itself a great idea and great country for decades, despite the disease of Communism. If the Western powers were true to their word of preserving multi ethnicity, Yugoslavia would be thriving as we speak. No amount of eu hegemony would be able to bring it down. Instead of supporting moderates in the early 1990s such as Fikret Abdic, they supported the Sharia-promoting terrorist Alija Izetbegovic. And now they are choosing Hashim Thaci as their ally which is the biggest sham of all. I guess the us, the Saudis, and Hashim can all walk hand in hand across the White House lawn.
I digress, though...
Albanians seem to be quite the nationalists, but only in other nations' lands. Very sad, indeed, that this proud people cannot figure out how to build there own economy, society, and moral foundation on something other than drugs, slave trade, and the black market. Of Saudi money always results in democtratic insitutions...
#73 Roland
on March 11, 2008 at 11:41 a.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
The main problem with letting Kosovo become "independent" (actually a NATO subsidized colony forever) is that about half the territory had a non-Albanian majority before NATO allowed the campaign of genocide & ethnic cleansing. Anybody who thinks there is a "right" for the current inhabitants of the cleansed areas to secede is deliberately legally supporting genocide & ethnic cleansing, which in my opinion are very bad things indeed.
So long as they are willing to say the same applies to Republica Serpska (in its former boundary), Krajina, San Deigo & Bradford I would have no further objection to a division on ethnic lines.
#74 Spencer
on March 11, 2008 at 12:01 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
Just over two thousand people, from all sides, died in Kosovo up to 1999 when NATO started it's murderous campaign of bombing from 15.000 feet. Here is a source I found out citing the figures given by the forensic unit which was on the ground http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/1999/...
International law has been broken. The UN has been sidelined in this adventure by the EU and the US. The repercussions will be felt all over the world. This has opened the door to any tin pot terrorist organisation.
Instead of negotiations the US gave a promise to a terrorist organisation, which is headed by two war criminals, that Kosovo would be given independence, thus making it unnecessary for them to attend the negotiating table.
What to do now? That is EU's headache. The US has got its huge base, Bondsteel near Urosevac and they're laughing! The EU will have to fund this failed state until it suits the KLA when they will turn on their benefactors just as they turned on the Serbs and all other minorities making Kosovo almost totally ethnically pure. Good job!
#75 african
on March 11, 2008 at 12:12 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
This is what its all about http://www.sandersresearch.com/index.... its nothing to do with Milosevic,genocide,right to self-determination, although that's a pretty good wheeze. Nothing to do with anything but the US strategic interest!
#76 neutrallll
on March 11, 2008 at 3:28 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
As an American I personally have no stake in this argument. However, I do think the Serbs and Albanians were in a civil war. Both sides were doing terrible rotten things to each other...they were both ethnically cleansing each other. But this conflict was a politically correct war and we picked the side who were supported by the terrorist. We only saw Christiane Amanpour's heart wrenching broadcast of fleeing refugees and all the horrors they encountered. Mean while, the Clinton Administration was trying to stop the bloodshed. I thought the Clinton Administration was doing the right thing but as I do more research it appears they did more harm than good. Did you know innocent Serbs civilians were killed? Nato forces attacked a bridge and killed them. Clinton Administration acted unilaterally without UN approval.
Maybe they were convinced by Christiane Amanpour's stories. Were we duped?
What were we doing?
What we should of done was to get the two sides at the peace table but no we picked a side. We thought we were helping the victimized Muslims but we helped the Muslim extremist and look we got in return....911!
"...Bin Laden directly aided the Bosnian Muslims, both financially (weapons procurement) and with training. In addition, that same “aid” was extended to the separatist Albanians of Kosovo and Macedonia. Ironically, the US found Bin Laden and his supporters “convenient” allies when dealing with Bosnian Muslims and Kosovo Albanians, again in another so-called struggle for “freedom”."
http://www.balkanpeace.org/our/our09....
The chief beneficiary of U.S. military intervention, the so-called Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), is a terrorist criminal syndicate, Maoist in its ideological bent, hard-wired into the international heroin trade, and tightly allied with Osama bin Laden. Additionally, American servicemen deployed in Kosovo would serve under the operational command of foreign military officers. In brief, the mission would advance the cause of international narco-terrorism, help entrench the European network of the world’s most notorious Islamic terrorist, and accelerate the erosion of U.S. sovereignty.
http://thenewamerican.com/tna/1999/03...
For goodness sakes they were calling General Wesley Clark a war criminal. What is going on here? Did we picked the wrong side?
http://wesclarkwarcriminal.tripod.com/
#77 Hypocracy
on March 11, 2008 at 4:19 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
5 reasons why Tibet unlike Kosovo will not become independent
Unlike Kosovo Tibet has a recorded history of statehood extending back to 127 B.C. Tibetan nation used to have its own Government, its own Foreign Office, treaty relations with other countries, distinct culture, history, language and religion. Before the Chinese invasion of 1950 Tibet was spread over 2.5 million sq km (965,255 sq mi), representing almost 25% of China's landmass, while Kosovo is less than 11,000 sq km (4,203 sq mi).
Nevertheless, Tibet will not become independent in the foreseeable future, and there are at least 5 reasons for that:
1. As a result of China's policy of population transfer, the non-Tibetan population has increased many times, reducing Tibetans to an insignificant minority in their own country. The language, customs and traditions of Tibet are gradually fading away. On the contrary it was Albanian population growth that slowly overwhelmed the ethnic Serbs in Kosovo.
2. Becoming more and more dependent on Chinese import United States will not support Tibet independence. In historic perspective this is not entirely something new, since American cowboy attitude (profits first!) towards native people is well known.
3. Fearing separatist movements on its own territory India will block Tibet independence as it already happened in the past. In November 1950 Tibet appealed to the United Nations for international assistance to oppose Chinese annexation. The Indian delegate to the United Nations opposed the inclusion of the question on the agenda. The issue was dropped on India's insistence.
4. China is a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council and a nuclear superpower, which makes a lot of difference.
5. Unlike oily tracks running through Kosovo, no major oil-pipeline will pass through Tibet.
All the Dalai Lama is asking today is autonomy, but the world turns its back to him and applauds to Kosovo's clamor.
#78 moral relativism
on March 11, 2008 at 5:01 p.m.(Santa Clara, CA | Unverified Name)
It has now become fashionable to distrust the US government and to second guess everything Uncle Sam does. However, US intervention in Kosovo was correct and justified.
Since 1912 Serbs have been nothing but colonial rulers in Kosovo, and they have tried multiple times to get rid of Kosovo's Albanian majority.
Serb academic Vaso Cubrilovic in his 1944 "Memorandum" on the "Minority problem" wrote: "After examining why the cleansing of minorities is necessary, let us now see what options are available for carrying out the task." (See <http://www.albanianhistory.net/texts/... )
In 1999 Serbia had ready plans to get rid of all Kosovo Albanians. The execution was flawless, it was not ad hoc, not amateurish. What I'm trying to say is that Serbia has a long standing policy of trying to solve its "Albanian minority" problem one way or another. The western decision-makers have understood this.
#79 free kosovo
on March 11, 2008 at 5:04 p.m.(Santa Clara, CA | Unverified Name)
http://www.argjiro.net/albi/red/?auth...
#80 G
on March 11, 2008 at 6:17 p.m.(Westchester, IL | Unverified Name)
To moral relativism:
If Serbs were colonizers, what do you refer to the participants of the League of Prizren? Land grabbers??? You're telling me the Serbs were so horrible that they forced the poor Albanians into the hands of Nazis under the SS Skanderberg division... Serbia liberated Kosovo from Ottoman rule in 1912. It was the final decisive blow that began in the north and ended in the southern Serbian province.
You're telling me the Serbs tried to get rid of the Albanian minority multiple times, but your argument isn't supported with facts. The demographics in Kosovo since WW2 have been drastically in favor of the Albanians. Hitler's annexation of Kosovo, followed by Tito's opening of the borders allowed the Albanians to enter Serbia at will. They were leaving the miserable country they refer to as Albania and soon became separatists. The Albanians in Kosovo terrorized and expelled thousands of Serbs from their homes. The New York Times reported in 1987 that 20,000 Serbs were expelled from Kosovo due to consistent Albanian separatists pressure and terror. From WW2 to today, the percentage of Albanians has gone from the 60s to almost 90%. Can you honestly continue your argument of a Serbian ethnic cleansing? Furthermore, the UN has refuted all arguments claiming the hundreds of thousands of dead Albanians. Serbia responded to Albanian terror with military and police action, which in my opinion was not enough. Don't think for a minute that because of American support that Albanians were the "good guys." This is the same America that has sold out its 3,000 dead New Yorkers by allying with saudi oil.
Albanians have always rode the tide of imperialism. They had support from the Ottoman, Austro-Hungarian, Nazi, and now American empire. They have failed miserably in the past and in short time will do so again. Little have they had historically in terms of some kind of public revolution against tyranny.
For Pete's sake, even an adviser to your beloved Bill Clinton referred to the KLA as terrorists.
And since you're giving us quotes, here are some for you:
When spring comes, we will manure the plains of Kosovo with the bones of Serbs…
-Isa Boletini, Kosovar political leader, 1913
The Serbian population of Kosovo should be removed as soon as possible. Serbian settlers should be killed.
-Mustafa Kruja, Nazi-fascist Prime Minister of Greater Albania, June, 1942
The time has come to exterminate the Serbs. There will be no Serbs under the Kosovo sun.
-Ferat-bey Draga, Nazi-fascist Kosovar Muslim political leader, 1943
So please... spare me your victim hood. Any sane person with half of a brain cell sees through your weak arguments.
#81 AlphaNumericus
on March 11, 2008 at 7:45 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
It does not matter what is driving Albanian side prolific posting. The general style and of-the-hip fired references are reminiscent of the professional propagandists from the CNN message board during the bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999. There is nothing that can be said that will make her change their philipiques against Serbs. Logically, should anyone in the West try to deport their Muslim immigrants for the sake of survival of their own country, or a part thereof (remember Malmo), then they should never be allowed to ever control the area again. It is stunning how far some people would go in imposing their view on everybody, only to feel good about their own views and attitudes. Arguing with their kind is literally a headache.
My real reward came some 5 years after the Yugoslavian war, at an air show in Omaha. A recogniscance helicopter pilot asked me about my home country, and then told me that he was stationed in Kosovo for a couple of years. I did not express any opinion about his mission, we only talked about flying in the Balkans - weather, terrain etc. Than, at the end he added: "As for the war, I think Miloshevic was right." Yes it is just one opinion of one Midwestern guy, it was not official, not recorded, may be or may not be the opinion of the other soldiers stationed there etc., etc.
And a million Albanian postings can not change it.
#82 AlphaNumericus
on March 11, 2008 at 7:47 p.m.(Newport, NH | Unverified Name)
It does not matter what is driving Albanian side prolific posting. The general style and of-the-hip fired references are reminiscent of the professional propagandists from the CNN message board during the bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999. There is nothing that can be said that will make change their philipiques against Serbs. Logically, should anyone in the West try to deport their Muslim immigrants for the sake of survival of their own country, or a part thereof (remember Malmo), then they should never be allowed to ever control the area again. It is stunning how far some people would go in imposing their view on everybody, only to feel good about their own views and attitudes. Arguing with their kind is literally a headache.
My real reward came some 5 years after the Yugoslavian war, at an air show in Omaha. A recogniscance helicopter pilot asked me about my home country, and then told me that he was stationed in Kosovo for a couple of years. I did not express any opinion about his mission, we only talked about flying in the Balkans - weather, terrain etc. Than, at the end he added: "As for the war, I think Miloshevic was right." Yes it is just one opinion of one Midwestern guy, it was not official, not recorded, may be or may not be the opinion of the other soldiers stationed there etc., etc.
And a million Albanian postings can not change it.
#83 John
on March 11, 2008 at 8 p.m.(Houston, TX | Unverified Name)
"Asia Times columnist Pepe Escobar said to look at Camp Bondsteel and the Albanian Macedonian Bulgarian Oil Corp. (AMBO) for answers as to why the United States is interested in Kosovo’s independence."
Esobar is sorely mistaken.
Camp Bondsteel is already well-established in the area, and its existence is unchanged by the independence of Kosovo, or lack thereof, because it exists under KFOR jurisidiction.
Furthermore, Vlore -- which is in southern Albania and is closer to Italy -- while already "guarded" by Bondsteel, is also in the military spehere of American personnel in Germany and nearby Italy. In fact, the Sixth Fleet is headquartered in Napoli, which is probably equadistant to the Gulf of Vlore as Bondsteel.
http://www.imaginaryplanet.net/essays...
#84 G
on March 11, 2008 at 9:02 p.m.(Westchester, IL | Unverified Name)
I should apologize for my last post being a bit harsh and unclear about American and saudi oil. I meant to say the American government not America. The emotions attached with my views about Kosovo caused a bit of an incoherent statement on my part. I know any red-blooded American is disgusted with our government aligning with saudi arabia and of course the albanians in Kosovo.
My humblest apologies...
And yes, I agree with AlphaNumericus... Great post.
#85 Bulgarian from Macedon
on March 11, 2008 at 10:56 p.m.(Berlin, Germany | Unverified Name)
To Macedon. The opposite would be the real things, all Bulgarians in Macedonia and the regions around start an insurgency as Gotze Deltchev and Yane Sandansky and create a new state together with todays Bulgaria!
#86 tete
on March 16, 2008 at 1:14 p.m.(London, United Kingdom | Unverified Name)
kosova-dardania-
#87 Edessa-Greece
on March 27, 2008 at 6:08 a.m.( | Unverified Name)
People from Skopje were BULGARIANS and have changed their last names recently to HIDE this fact. They speak a BULGARIAN DIALECT and the FIRST TIME they printed the Bible in NON BULGARIAN langauge was just in 1964! Only after 1964! Their language (3/4 Bulgarian with some serb words added) was invented in 1944 by Tito's decision and called "Macedonian" although Skopje WAS NEWVER in Macedonian territory.
#88 MACEDONIAN
on March 27, 2008 at 7:06 a.m.( | Unverified Name)
We Macedonians that live in Greece Declare that we are Greeks since the beggining of our history and we have nothing to do with the so called 'Republic of Macedonia', a state situated in the Northen part of Historical Macedonia that is part of Greece. This new State created by the communist regime of Tito in 1944, has no connection with Historical Macedonia, Culture and Language!
This new State is not recognized by UN under this name but only as 'Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia' until they accept a name that respects their identity that is SlavoBulgarian and that also respects Greece's History of Macedonia!
Slavobulgarians of FYROM try to confuse with their posts in various sites on internet the minority of them who dosen't know the historical and geografical reallity of Macedonia and so in a future time can have a minimum support on their fake claims.
FYROM is a State that lives on drug and army traffic, having a 60% of unalphabetism and the bigger percentage of corruption in all europe!
#89 MACEDONIAN
on March 27, 2008 at 7:23 a.m.( | Unverified Name)
#2 Macedon
commented, on
March 10, 2008 at 3:27 a.m.:
I wonder, can we Macedonians (He means, Slavobulgarians of Skopia), start similar insurgency in Bulgarian south-west province where majority of population are Macedonians (bulgarians as in Skopia) and also in North Greece, where majority are Macedonians (he wants to confuse people that has no historical and geografical backround, purposely confusing Macedonians -Greeks, with the SlavoBulgarians of the ''Republic of Macedonia'' as it is known the State of Skopia in USA! A 900 people with slavic origin are in the Macedonian province of greece where 3.500.000 of Greeks-macedonians are living!) too?
Probably NO because those 2 countries are members of EU, despite fact that this 2 countries do not have a standards for ethnic minority's and have fake democracy.( The Slavobulgarian entity of the 'Clown' of Balkans as the state of FYROM is known in the area, where coruption and traffic of drug and army are the main product, and where analphabetism is 60% of the population, accuse the only 2 big and democratic states of Balkans, of not having standards!!!)
All this matter with Kosovo is solving one problem, but opens a dozen new...
#90 Ricky
on April 22, 2008 at 4:59 a.m.(Oakville, Canada | Unverified Name)
This Kosovo issue is beyond morbid. Supporting muslim terrorists against other Christian Europeans!! Does anyone even remember Afghanistan anymore?
Post a comment