The Daily of the University of Washington

Puget Sound may rise six inches by 2050


Researchers from the UW’s Pacific Northwest Climate Impacts Group (CIG) and the Washington State Department of Ecology estimate the region’s sea levels will rise 6 inches by 2050 and 14 inches by 2100.


Photo by Jennifer Au.

Sea levels in the Puget Sound have risen six inches over the past few years.


Both Philip Mote, a CIG scientist, and Spencer Reeder, a policy strategist from the Washington State Department of Ecology, maintain these numbers as valid estimates.

“These aren’t predictions but estimates based on the current science,” Reeder said.

One of the purposes of the research is to provide a risk assessment of the area to local businesses and private homeowners who could have plans for construction on the coast, he said.

“You don’t want to plan for the best case; you want to plan for the worst case,” Reeder said.

The estimates are the most probable of three estimates provided for the Puget Sound.

In the worst-case scenario, the Sound may even have a sea-level rise of 22 inches by 2050, although that scenario is unlikely.

The CIG has discovered the critical role of vertical land motion in the rise or fall of sea level. The movement of active tectonic plates affects Washington state because of its geographic location. The Olympic Peninsula, for example, is rising faster than sea level is, so the sea level may actually drop in that region.

Other factors contributing to the Sound’s sea-level rise are the melting edges of Antarctica and Greenland. Changes in winds and storms in the Northwest region are another factor.

“The largest contributor is really the thermal expansion, followed by the melting ice,” Reeder said. Thermal expansion is the expansion of the ocean due to increased absorption of heat energy.

Even if warming was to stop entirely tomorrow, the oceans would continue to expand for decades, Reeder said.

“Sea-level rise is most likely to continue on from global warming,” he said.

However, Reeder and Mote remain optimistic.

Mote sees the changes as an economic opportunity for suppliers of energy-efficient products.

“It is a burgeoning market for these products,” Mote said in regard to solar power, wind power and other renewable energy sources.

For Reeder, the concern really depends on the community. Communities close to the high tide level should be more nervous about sea level than those living away from the coast.

Weather patterns are also critical.

“On a calm day with no winds and no storms, 6 inches won’t make that much of a difference, [but with a storm] the 6 inches might make all the difference in the world,” Reeder said.

Mote said he fears climate change will directly impact capital investments.

“I would certainly look at the Port of Seattle, Port of Tacoma and Port of Olympia [as areas of concern],” Mote said, because large amounts of money are invested in those areas.

Reeder emphasized the importance of recognizing that global warming is both natural and aided by humans.

“The truth lies in the middle,” he said.

[Reach contributing writer Semonti Hossain at development@thedaily.washington.edu.]


2 Comments

#1 John Seebeth
(Everett, WA | Unverified Name)

on February 6, 2008 at 2:35 p.m.
Report this comment

Semonti Hossain writes:

"One of the purposes of the research is to provide a risk assessment of the area to local businesses and private homeowners who could have plans for construction on the coast, he said.

'“You don’t want to plan for the best case; you want to plan for the worst case,”' Reeder said.

The estimates are the most probable of three estimates provided for the Puget Sound.

In the worst-case scenario, the Sound may even have a sea-level rise of 22 inches by 2050, although that scenario is unlikely."

*****************

Its really hard to make this statement concerning worst case projections at this time. The latest IPCC report talks about sea-level rise without much said about what contributions either Greenland or West Antarctica will make to the rise. And then there are so-called abrupt climate changes thats been in the news allot lately that could dramatically speed up any sea-level rise. (article below) U.N. sponsored research teams as well as others are going to study both Greenland and Antarctica during the next several years to help understand whats happening. (articles below) This knowledge will be of better use for the formulation of public policy than what is currently the case.

****************

Nine zones are identified as key climate ‘tipping points’
Lewis Smith
From The Times
February 5, 2008

Nine regions of the world face massive, abrupt and potentially irreversible changes over the next century because of manmade global warming, researchers have said.

Scientists from 52 countries identified nine zones in which they assessed the world’s most dramatic climatic “tipping points” would be located and how long the decline would take. Each region was judged to require just a small change in conditions to have a huge and disproportionate impact on the environment.

http://www.climateark.org/shared/read...

****************

West Antarctic to be covered with scientific instruments
Ohio State University
December 10, 2007

In a mission of unprecedented scale, scientists are about to cover West Antarctica with a network of sensors to monitor the interactions between the ice and the earth below -- 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.

http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/p...

********************

Greenland Ice Could be Next Puzzle for UN Panel
INDONESIA: December 10, 2007

BALI, Indonesia - A thaw of Greenland ice that could raise world sea levels may be the next puzzle for the UN climate panel that won the Nobel Peace Prize, a senior member of the group said.

Dutch scientist Bert Metz said the risk of an accelerating melt of Greenland's ice sheet was among the unsolved issues in the UN reports this year that blame mankind for causing global warming and urge quick action to avert the worst impacts.

http://www.reuters.com/article/latest...

#2 Aditya G.
(Kirkland, WA | Unverified Name)

on February 6, 2008 at 9:33 p.m.
Report this comment

I agree with J. Seebeth, the IPCC reports do not take into account positive feedback mechanisms, which could trigger 'abrupt non-linear' climate change. As I understand that means change on a much more rapid scale than the so-called 'worst-case' situations described, a scale likely to rule out effective means of mitigation.

Indeed, we have made a Faustian pact and the more we delay, the more difficult survival will become.


Post a comment

Name:


(None, None | Unverified Name)
Login to verify your name

Email:


Required, but not shown.

Comment: