By
Editorial Staff
November 26, 2008
By Sarah Jeglum, Arla Shephard, Randy Ferreiro, Casey Smith, Natalie Sikavi
Thursday is Thanksgiving, and while the giving of thanks on that day is certainly important, it’s sometimes hard to determine exactly what you’re thankful for. Most people say family, friends, a safe place to sleep or even for life itself. Besides these abstracts, however, it’s difficult to decide what exactly is good in our lives and what maybe isn’t so good.
So, instead of thanks-giving, we decided to go with thanks-taking. It was easier to determine what we might want to remove from our lives — the things we aren’t so thankful for — as a means of figuring out what we are thankful for.
Things we’re not so thankful for:
Cell phones: when they ring incessantly, or in class, or when you’re just about to fall asleep.
Flies: especially of the fruit variety, which never seem to go away, especially at The Daily.
Daylight savings time (fall back): because it gets dark so early.
Global warming: period.
Fast food: which implies a lack of social interaction and conjures up thoughts of childhood obesity solely by virtue.
TV dinners: just an excuse to be in a hurry.
Instant everything: messaging, potatoes, coffee, etc. They’re all a means to instant gratification, and patience is, after all, a virtue.
Florescent lights: Does anyone look good under those things?
Facebook: Okay, we admit it. While it’s great in some ways, we prefer human-to-human interaction, and we’re not big fans of stalking.
Husky football: Let’s just say we are thankful it’s basketball season.
Consumerism: Do we buy gifts for each other during the holidays because we want to or because Macy’s tells us that we should? Spending time with the people who matter to you is a better gift in the end.
Politics: In the behind-the-scenes, soap opera, alliances-made-over-three-martinis kind of way.
People who overshare (we made it up): You know that person who you’re working with on that class project who stays after the project meeting to tell you his/her entire life story? We’re thankful for the people who just leave when the work has been equally divided.
Pop-up ads: especially when you can’t figure out how to close that pesky little box.
Spam e-mail: If you’re not already on the delete-everything-shady bandwagon, it’s time. If we all join together, we can make spam obsolete.
Amazon’s Kindle: Even though Oprah seems to like the new “eBook” gadget, we still prefer used bookstores, yellowed pages and the smell when you stick your nose close to the binding.
Acronyms: ADCOMSUBORDCOMPHIBSPAC explains it all. It’s a U.S. Navy term for “Administrative Command, Amphibious Forces, Pacific Fleet Subordinate Command.” Spring that one on your friends next time you’re bored and try to convince them the world is better off with 22-letter abbreviations.
Knick-knacks: Like when you go to grandma’s house and there’s a small army of frogs — some laying in beach chairs, others shopping, one playing golf — lining the mantle. Who knows what could be done with all the money spent on knick-knacks every year.
Overcommitment: It’s how our society works these days — too much to do and too little time — and it’s not healthy or sustainable. We’re always running to the next event and we’re always double-booked. So, this Thanksgiving, even though it sounds cheesy, scratch that Honors Club meeting off your schedule, no matter how good it might look on your resume, and hang out with your family or friends. Spend that hour figuring out what you’re thankful for, even if it is life itself. You’ll be thankful you did in the end.
6 Comments
#1 Only Reads for the Drama
on November 25, 2008 at 8:12 p.m.(Tacoma, WA | Unverified Name)
You know what I'd be thankful for? If one of you got fired. I'm looking at you, Sarah Jeglum.
This newspaper meant something in the past, but now it's like any other tabloid bitchfest. Not good enough to line my bird cage with.
#2 Breaking News
on November 25, 2008 at 9:29 p.m.(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)
What's next for the Editorial Staff, a Christmas gift list?
Are you guys purposefully thumbing your noses at Emmert while he is doing inventory?
Because 20% is big budget cut...
#3 Carl D.
on November 26, 2008 at 12:31 a.m.(Seattle, WA)
Well aren't we lucky that there's no such thing as the Amazon "Kimble" then. Seriously, have you people ever considered reading over what you've written before sending it for publication? I thinks it's known colloquially as 'editing'. I know that's not your strong suit in the EDITORIAL department, so head on over to Advertising and see if they can give you a quick tutorial. Here's a hint - when referring to a product sold by amazon.com it's probably a good idea to head on over and actually take a look at their website, on which you will find a prominently placed ad for the Amazon KINDLE. Just a thought.
#4 a
on November 26, 2008 at 3:21 a.m.(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)
YOU
shut up forever all of you, you suck at your jobs and physically hurt anyone who reads anything you've written.
#5 Renato Mendoza
on November 26, 2008 at 3:34 a.m.(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)
When I read the title of the piece and clicked on the link, I was very interested that The Daily was actually going to address the issue of the lies we are taught in history classes and what is portrayed in by media.
What I mean is, the idea that this is a holiday to be thankful for. That the pilgrims and other early european settlers made it through a few hard winters and managed to make this great country. The reality is that this day should really be called "Thanks Taking" because that is what the founders of this country did and what many people continue doing. It also represents a history of genocide and massacre for the native nations that lived on this continent before John Smith and the "other settlers" came.
Aside from the absurdity of the article, it creates a false idea of what "thanks taking" is about. It is about recognizing that the founders did a lot of really fucked up shit to the people that were living here before them. It is recognizing that land-hungry white people killed millions of people with diseases, weapons, and institutions. It is recognizing that apologies must be made and dignity restored. Thanks taking is not this worthless blabber about how your tired of cellphones and your boyfriend cheating on you. Please stop writing.
I know that The Daily reached its 117 anniversary, but I hope you know that no one takes it seriously.
Renato
#6 Rohan S.
on November 27, 2008 at 3:14 p.m.(Seattle, WA)
I think this is actually pretty insightful. If you look at the things the editorial board is apparently unhappy with (modern conveniences, the way our society works today, etc.), you can see this nostalgic attitude for the past and the way society supposedly used to work. I think in that light, some of the controversial articles that have come out of The Daily over the past few months, like the one espousing a return to "traditional" marriage and banning gay marriage, actually make a lot more sense.
I'd recommend you check out the latest episodes of Penn & Taller's "Bullshit" series, which really debunks this entire cultural nostalgia. Cell phones save lives, having things instantly frees up our time to do other things, Facebook lets us keep in touch over long distances, e-books are a convenient way to expand your knowledge, acronyms make long phrases shorter, fluorescent lights are good for the environment, and overcommitment is primarily a symptom of bad time management.
Post a comment