By
Jackson Rohrbaugh
October 29, 2008
I don’t like it when our state and city mishandle money for mass transit.
Most commuter-relief attempts in Seattle have been laughable. The monorail is a cheap copy of a Disneyland ride, the Seattle Streetcar has about four daily riders and the Sounder train doesn’t yet reach North Seattle, where many of our freeway-clogging brethren come from.
But a solution has been proposed.
It starts with a rail line, coming in 2009, from SeaTac Airport to downtown, and it’s going to eventually join Northgate, the UW, Capitol Hill and the Eastside. Much like a communist regime redistributes income, car commuters will be appropriately funneled into different modes of transportation. I won’t wave any red flags, but I will support Proposition 1.
Imagine being able to travel from Tacoma to Everett. Well, I actually don’t want to imagine being in either Tacoma or Everett, so I’ll just be happy with the SeaTac linkup. Imagine being able to go to the airport and skip traffic and departure lines. You’ll even be able to go downtown from the Eastside or the U-District. By 2020, as the rail lines expand, you could even shop at the Targets in Northgate, SoDo and Tukwila, just in case the first two were out of Bugs Bunny sneakers and Lil’ Wayne albums.
I choose to support Prop. 1 not because I think it’s perfect, nor because it will solve all of our region’s transportation problems. If you go to masstransitnow.org, the Web site in support of Prop. 1, there’s a glaring lack of concrete evidence. How many commuters will be taken off the road during peak hours? How many cars will be removed from the sparkling river of I-5 traffic? These questions are important, but they stem from a deeper problem.
We live in a region that is still heavily reliant on the automobile, but I think that Prop. 1 is what’s needed to remove some of this dependency. First, it will restore our area’s faith in public transportation. It’s hard to estimate ridership because everyone is content with driving a car right now. But when the glorious train lines are completed, and trains are running on 15-minute or better frequencies, opinions will shift. Like crows attracted to shiny objects, dark-clothed Seattleites will inquisitively flock to the rails. Our infrastructure needs to grow before our faith can be restored in it.
This can be somewhat of a slippery slope. Sound Transit hasn’t been a very effective spender in the past, and while the plan promises strict auditing, these are the types of projects that can leech public money like a divorcee on alimony. So it’s important that we all use the lines once they’re up. Not only will we save money, time and energy, but our region’s health will improve. We’ll have less car pollution, more time with our fellow commuters and more ads for Beacon Plumbing plastered across the sides of our public transportation.
Prop. 1 will also include an immediate increase in bus service, both express and standard. Although the rail lines will take time, money and energy to complete, we’ll have immediate bus relief, which will pave the way for a connected and less congested Puget Sound region. For a minute tax increase of 0.5 percent, Prop. 1 has my money, my occasional criticism and my support. I even wrote an anti-Prop. 1 article last fall when the plan looked too expensive and too convoluted, but now that it’s been reworked for the better, they deserve our collective support come Nov. 4.
Reach columnist Jackson Rohrbaugh at opinion@dailyuw.com.
4 Comments
#1 Keith O.
on October 29, 2008 at 6:14 p.m.(UW Campus)
Be weary of propositions placing strict guidelines for projects without so strict means of paying for them. The goals of this proposition are certainly worthy ones, however, voter introduced legislation often lacks a strategy to pay for the projects leading to massive state budget issues. Rather than introduce this change via a proposition I would highly recommend petitioning your state representatives to enact similar legislation in congress where the means of taxing and paying for the projects will be more likely to see the project through without massive budget shortages.
#2 Diane
on October 29, 2008 at 7:25 p.m.(UW Campus | Unverified Name)
Yes the monorail is a cheap copy of a Disneyland ride, but it was never intended as commuter relief. It is and always has been a relic of the World's Fair
#3 Commentator
on October 29, 2008 at 9:19 p.m.(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)
If you live right next to rail, or own property next to it, it is a great deal. For the rest of us, the value is dubious unless there's a massive expansion of local bus services getting people to the station. In other words, Prop 1 is a blank check with a lot of blanks to be filled in later at who knows what cost, with no opportunity for voter input if it turns out that Sound Transit lies to us again as they've done in the past.
Do you really trust all their hype?
How much debt should our region take on and what's the priority, something new or fixing what we already have to fix, namely the viaduct and 520?
#4 John Niles
on November 1, 2008 at 10:40 p.m.(Vancouver, Canada | Unverified Name)
Jackson likes Prop 1 for "immediate bus relief, which will pave the way for a ..." yadda, yadda.
The bus relief is not so immediate, according to a letter just issued by the State's Expert Review Panel for Sound Transit. Prop 1's new bus hours only compensate for last year's ridership growth, and they don't get fully rolling until 2010. You can read this letter to the Governor and Sound Transit in all its gory detail at http://www.bettertransport.info/pitf/... .
Also, there is nothing "minute" about a tax increase that doubles Sound Transit's take of one million dollars per day to two million, with the 1996 Plan for the first million completed only partially by 2016.
What's the rush to double down?
Don't forget that the no-new-taxes alternative to Prop 1 is to let Sound Transit finish the light rail connection from Husky Stadium to the Airport with the sales tax already being collected.
The agency says it can do this, as described at http://www.bettertransport.info/pitf/... .
Post a comment