By
John Fay
October 21, 2008
On the issue of education, I believe my hero Stephen Colbert put it best when in an interview with Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings, he asked point blank, “Why can’t we leave children behind?” There is something wrong with America when even conservatives like George Bush believe every American child should have a college degree regardless of their ability, needs or interests.
Now, in regards to which politician, McCain or Obama, has the better education plan, I might as well flip a coin. Both of them are approaching the problem from a flawed premise. We seem to have reached a point in America where both parties view education as some sort of entitlement program. Like with social security, which every politician wants to protect, even if it has become a problem itself.
As Bob Schieffer pointed out while moderating the third presidential debate, the United States spends more per capita on math and science in schools than any other country in the world. Our high school graduation rate stands at roughly 70 percent, and a quarter of our population has some kind of college education. Yet, in many of the hard sciences, our nation significantly lags behind the rest of the first world.
This is particularly perplexing when you consider that in 1910 only 10 percent of Americans had a high school diploma, and even fewer than that had ever attended college. Yet, the 1910 generation included Henry Ford, the Wright brothers and Thomas Alva Edison. In the 50 years since 1910, America has produced some of the greatest scientists, doctors, politicians and military leaders in all of human history. Since we became obsessed with making sure no child gets left behind, our nation’s collective intelligence has been heading downhill.
The reason for this difference is stark and obvious. In 1910, Americans cared more about merit than they did about a college degree. Today they care more about a college degree than they do about merit.
The desperate desire for people’s advancement has institutionalized mediocrity at every level of America’s education system. After I left my high school, I was appalled to learn a mandatory advanced placement class had been created for all sophomores. Apparently no one considered that an advanced placement class is self-contradictory if every student is in it. I know students in high school who should never have graduated due to their number of absences. Not only did they graduate, but the students also managed to get into the UW, which is supposedly one of the best institutions of learning on the West Coast. The effects outside of the school system are palpable. My father, a Boeing engineer, often rolls his eyes when speaking of the woeful unpreparedness of new Boeing employees coming out of college who, even after four years of education, still have no idea how to function in the working world.
There’s not much the government can do to solve this problem other than tell the American people the truth. To improve education, we have to slowly grow out of this mentality that every child should graduate from a four-year university. If you can learn more about engineering in one year as an engineer, why spend four years as a student?
Colleges should exist, as they originally existed, for the purpose of educating those interested in jobs that require higher education, such as law and medicine. High schools should be geared toward helping kids find a job, but neither McCain nor Obama will say that. They know, as I know, that the American people just don’t want to hear it.
Reach columnist John Fay at opinion@dailyuw.com.
6 Comments
#1 Misster P.
on November 25, 2008 at 2:01 p.m.(Redwood City, CA)
You think Colbert is actually a Republican. That's funny.
#2 Jake F.
on November 25, 2008 at 2:21 p.m.(UW Campus)
You are a tool. Colbert is making fun of people like you.
#3 Lol.
on November 25, 2008 at 9:16 p.m.(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)
You're absolutely right.
....So, why don't you take the initiative and drop out now since you obviously lack the intelligence to make any real use of a 4 year degree?
#4 Brian
on November 30, 2008 at 5:20 p.m.(UW Campus | Unverified Name | UW Community)
I would like to point out that other first world countries have advanced to the point where we are all now on a level education field and now leaders will be determined by their merit, not their nationality. Also, why must the United States remain the best? Could we not become equals with our fellow countries as we help to achieve a global society? (This is not implying that we lower our standards but instead raise our fellow countries up.)
#5 CLW
on December 2, 2008 at 12:24 p.m.(UW Campus | Unverified Name)
1. "Since we became obsessed with making sure no child gets left behind, our nation’s collective intelligence has been heading downhill."
Thanks for insulting everyone in our nation, asshole. Please generalize more.
2. "My father, a Boeing engineer, often rolls his eyes when speaking of the woeful unpreparedness of new Boeing employees coming out of college who, even after four years of education, still have no idea how to function in the working world."
Keep your father out of this, because he most certainly might've been in the same situation as he went into Boeing his first year. I wonder if your dad is proud of your stupidity so blatantly displayed throughout this article.
3. "High schools should be geared toward helping kids find a job, but neither McCain nor Obama will say that. They know, as I know, that the American people just don’t want to hear it."
Even if you're just trying to get a rise out of creating controvery through your editorial opinions, these last two sentences from this "article" are more full of holes than a kid grown up on PCP.
People like you, Mr. Fay, don't deserve a spot in one of the "best institutions" on the West Coast. You're a moron and you proved your own damn point, "I know students in high school who should never have graduated ... Not only did they graduate, but the students also managed to get into the UW."
#6 Rebecca_F
on May 14, 2009 at 4:17 p.m.(UW Campus | UW Community)
"most certainly might've"?
Post a comment