The Daily of the University of Washington

PETA claims UW misused lab animals (Part 1 of 3)


Despite efforts to improve its image, trouble continues to plague UW animal research laboratories.


Photo by File Photo.

Open ceilings, such as these, in the animal testing facilities of the UW Health Sciences Center, must be replaced by drop-down ceilings.


People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has sent the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC), an international nonprofit organization working to promote the humane treatment of animals in science through voluntary accreditation and assessment programs, a letter asking for the UW's accreditation in animal testing to be revoked.

PETA's accusations follow a six-month probation that the UW recently served for its animal labs; complaints included lighting, sanitation and ventilation problems in the Warren G. Magnson Health Sciences Center.

The PETA letter reveals numerous violations that UW professors and lab workers have allegedly committed since the university entered its probationary sentence in November 2006.

The letter describes one incident where supposedly euthanized animals, "were found alive after being tossed into a cooler used for storing [dead] animal bodies."

Some of the violations listed involved unauthorized surgeries, surgeries conducted without the use of anesthetics and the failure to sterilize equipment.

Dr. Debra Durham, a former lecturer at the UW and a current member of PETA's Research and Investigations Department, submitted the letter on behalf of the organization.

"If [researchers] can't be bothered to ask permission, what can they be bothered to do?" Durham asked. "That's the most basic thing you can do on this campus, is ask permission to use animals and get approval. If you can't make that minimal step, I have no trust that other rules can be followed."

The letter was sent along with information obtained by Ruth Hanscom, a veterinary medical officer from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.

During a routine inspection, Hanscom discovered one deceased animal, a monkey known as A01136, was tested repeatedly in violation of the written approved protocol.

The monkey was initially approved for two surgeries, one involving the implantation of an eye coil and the other a removal of cranial bone.

However, A01136 endured additional unauthorized surgeries for three years, which eventually caused the primate to bleed heavily from a major head implant.

Researchers discovered the animal dead in its cage the morning following the implant.

Hanscom said the "...cause of death for [A01136] was never determined because the researcher, in whose experimentation this animal was used, had cut off the primate's head and refused to allow the veterinary staff of the UW to examine it, despite a specific request for this vitally important organ."

PETA's letter also noted that one researcher, a former member of the UW Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), had publicly used "four pigs to test equipment for a company."

IACUC is the entity responsible for overseeing policies and procedures used on research animals at the UW.

"He didn't have permission to use those pigs for the testing," Durham said. "And he didn't have general permission to do commercial testing."

Durham was ashamed that the researcher's actions were ignored because the tests involved pigs.

"[That researcher's] general protocol involves surgery," Durham said. "It's not like; do pigs like to be petted? It's more severe."

One of the accused, Daniel Storm, a professor of pharmacology, was unable to comment on the issue because of ongoing legal proceedings.

He did, however, defend IACUC. Storm also expressed support for Nona Phillips, UW director of the Office of Animal Welfare and Virginia Batterson, a research associate professor of Comparative Medicine.

"In all of my dealings with the Animal Care Committee, I have found them to be a dedicated group of people working with the faculty to make sure that we all obey AAALAC regulations," Storm said. "The Animal Care Committee is a wonderful group of people who do everything possible to protect animals used in research and make sure we are in compliance with ever-changing regulations."

Claims in the PETA letter are being investigated, while AAALAC is expected to make a final decision on the UW's accreditation later this month.

Reach reporter Anthony Shelley at news@thedaily.washington.edu.


6 Comments

#1 Jack Beauty
(Renton, WA | Unverified Name)

on May 8, 2007 at 3:15 a.m.
Report this comment

5/28/02, PETA paid $9,370.00 for a "walk-in freezer". Why would PETA need a walk-in freezer this big?

"..sometimes the only kind option for some animals is to put them to sleep forever." -Ingrid Newkirk, President of PETA. IS this hypocritical of PETA?

PETA killed("put to sleep forever") 1325 animals in 2002. They took in 2103 meaning PETA "saved" only 778 that year; almost 2/3 of the animals killed by PETA.

So PETA has the gull to accuse our University of mistreatment of animals despite their own hypocritical shortcomings? UW better watch out, according to PETA's tax records, PETA donated money to a Rodney Adam Coronado; who in 1995 burned down the Michigan State University animal research facility. Look for yourselves. It is my opinion their organization is the most putrid piece of scum out there.

Also Mary Beth Sweetland, a vice president of PETA, is a type one diabetic meaning she injects herself daily with insulin; insulin derived from testing on animals.

#2 Katt
(None, None | Unverified Name)

on May 8, 2007 at 8:04 a.m.
Report this comment

Jack Beauty is obviously involved with Center for Consumer Freedom (a known industry front group that you can find out more about at http://www.ConsumerDeception.com). This group is against anything that conflicts with the interest of the companies that pay them - such as Mothers Against Drunk Driving because the group receives money from alcohol companies. PETA is not a no-kill organization and anyone who visits PETA's Web site will see that the group is very clear about this. However, none of this is the point of the article and Jack can think however he wants or however he is paid to think. It wasn't PETA who said, "“…cause of death for [A01136] was never determined because the researcher, in whose experimentation this animal was used, had cut off the primate’s head and refused to allow the veterinary staff of the UW to examine it, despite a specific request for this vitally important organ.” - A government inspector said this about a UW professor who implanted coils in the primate's head, removed a cranial bone, and then subjected the primate to experiment after experiment (all unauthorized)until he died. As though that wasn't enough, the primates head was cut off and hid. This is THE POINT of the article, and one's opinion of PETA doesn't change what this UW professor did or the fact that the university's animal labs are failing animals like primate A01136.

#3 David
(Hampton, VA | Unverified Name)

on May 8, 2007 at 5:57 p.m.
Report this comment

Jack is a joke; every shelter in the country euthanizes, and PETA, the Humane Society, and everyone else knows that has to happen. The UW lab abuses animals in absurd tests. That's the fact, Jack. Check out www.PETA.org to find out what PETA's all about--cool group.

#4 Susan
(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)

on May 9, 2007 at 3:39 a.m.
Report this comment

The Daily should reference its own far more balanced articles when this story broke. If Debi Durham could speak from a legitimate scientific/academic perspective rather than that of a paid shill for PETA, perhaps her credibility or platform would not be constantly called into question.

#5 Jacob
(Federal Way, WA | Unverified Name)

on May 9, 2007 at 6:36 a.m.
Report this comment

If Jack is involved with the Center for Consumer Freedom, then Katt is involved with PETA. PETA does kill animals--http://petakillsanimals.com/downloads/PetaKillsAnimals.pdf

That's an actual reporting of what PETA does at its shelters.

Not only that, their employees have dumped the dead puppies in a grocery store dumpsters: http://www.roanoke-chowannewsherald.c...

I support animals, but I don't support PETA.

#6 Mike
(Sedro Woolley, WA | Unverified Name)

on May 9, 2007 at 4:07 p.m.
Report this comment

So Suzi, you mean the paid shills at the UW are somehow purer than the paid shills at PETA? If references and scientific/academics are so important to you, why not ask for specific proof about an allegation or claim you don't believe? If where a person works is the deciding factor in whether they should be believed, then you should be up front about who pays your bills.


Post a comment

Name:


(None, None | Unverified Name)
Login to verify your name

Email:


Required, but not shown.

Comment: