By
Amy Korst
May 17, 2007
For a world-class university, the UW made a very amateur move in the selection of the 2007 commencement speaker.
In case you haven't heard, this year's graduating class will be addressed by our own congressman Norm Dicks (D-Bremerton). Dicks is a great guy, an active and iconic Northwest politician, and I'm sure he's a great speaker, but let's face it, he's not the big name people expect as a major university's graduation speaker.
When I complained about the selection to friends, the response was a consistent, "I don't know who that is." Aside from the statement that could be made about the lack of political awareness among our generation, this speaks volumes. The UW managed to pick, from an entire global population, a keynote speaker whom no one has ever heard of.
Admittedly, the UW's situation was getting desperate. Norm Arkans, the UW's director of media relations and communications, told The Daily, "One of the folks we were interested in — and who had some interest in doing it — it turns out ultimately the schedule wouldn't [allow] that to happen. Then we began to engage conversations with other folks."
The UW was left scrambling at the last minute to find a speaker, so they turned to commencement speaker selection committee member Dicks.
Dicks agreed, having addressed UW Tacoma in 2002. He plans to donate the $10,000 speaker fee he'll receive back to the University.
Dicks has told the Seattle Post Intelligencer he plans to focus on public service and protecting the environment in his speech. Both are worthy, and safe, topics, but they are unlikely to inspire the 39,000 audience members Dicks is supposed to impress.
So, nothing against Dicks and his impressive congressional career, but the UW seems to have missed the point of a keynote commencement speaker this year.
Graduates, after paying and working their way through four-plus years of college, want to show up to commencement and be wowed by a speaker, as opposed to seeing a local man who regularly speaks in the area.
High-profile commencement speakers are a tradition at major universities, too. In the past, the UW has booked playwright August Wilson, writer Sherman Alexie and Secretary of State Madeleine Albright.
Oprah Winfrey just spoke at Howard University after receiving an honorary degree from the historically black college. Former presidents George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton will address the University of New Hampshire this weekend. Bill Cosby will speak to New York University graduates.
The list goes on. Graduates across the country are hearing from award-winning scientists, retired astronauts, celebrities and presidential candidates.
UW administration needs to realize that the commencement ceremonies are a culmination of all the hard work graduates have put into receiving their degrees, and a carefully selected speaker should honor and reflect that hard work.
Plus, UW officials should realize that the whole commencement experience isn't exactly fun, especially for UW bachelor's degree candidates. Should I choose to go to commencement, I get to look forward to sitting in Husky Stadium while my family members in the stands peer down at a purple mass and speculate as to which dot I am. The names of graduates receiving bachelor's degrees aren't event called; we merely get to walk across the stage and shake hands with either President Mark Emmert or a dean of a the UW.
The commencement address would have been the highlight of this otherwise unfortunate experience.
While I realize the UW cannot announce the name of each bachelor's degree graduate, it would be nice to see the University honor our achievement alongside that of master's and doctoral degree candidates. A thoughtfully chosen commencement speaker would have done just that.
Reach columnist Amy Korst at opinion@thedaily.washington.edu.
7 Comments
#1 Elizabeth Campbell
on May 17, 2007 at 4:18 a.m.(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)
While I agree that the UW admin dropped the ball in its handling of the graduation speaker, they are blameworthy for entirely different reasons than what is set out here. I have to say this, the idea that you're entitled to a headliner type of speaker, I don't see that part at all. What students are entitled to is the expectation that the administration handles its tasks in a professional and timely manner, and isn't so disorganized that when one person says they can't speak at the commencement, they have no backup plan, to the point that they must publicly acknowledge that they are scrambling. That speaks about lack of planning, and poor management. That is the issue, not some "we deserve to be handsomely entertained".
#2 Jennifer Payne
on May 17, 2007 at 7 a.m.(UW Campus | Unverified Name)
Norm Dicks is the representative from Bremerton not Bellingham.
#3 Online Editor
on May 17, 2007 at 8:49 a.m.(Redmond, WA | Unverified Name)
Corrected. Thanks.
#4 Siv
on May 17, 2007 at 9:17 a.m.(Renton, WA | Unverified Name)
Nobody knows Norm Dicks? - poor guy, he's got such a good Congressional record....
Anyway, look at it this way: uber-prestigous Columnbia's commencement speaker the year is Matthew Fox - of "Lost" and "Party of Five" fame. While UW grads will be treated to yet another campus lecture on enviromental stewardship, (which is really only a safe topic amongst us green-minded pacific northwesterners who are inundated with eco-ethics daily), Columnbia's grads can listen to Charlie Salinger wax poetic about what must be a daunting and extensive daily hair-care routine.
Princeton, on the other hand, got "The West Wing's" Bradley Whitford. Although he plays someone who's important on TV, he's not even a regulation hottie.
Looks like even the Ivies have to suffer through disapointing commencement speakers, although, this year at Harvard, the last-day address will be delivered by both Bill Clinton AND Bill Gates. Guess that's what 40G tuition gets you these days.
#5 Bryan
on May 17, 2007 at 2:02 p.m.(San Mateo, CA | Unverified Name)
Having been to 2 UW commencement ceremonies, I can assure you that it doesn't matter who speaks. Nobody pays attention after the first ten minutes, so the UW may as well take that $10K and spend it on something people will remember... like an open bar. Now that would make the school the talk of the nation!
#6 julia
on May 17, 2007 at 2:22 p.m.(UW Campus | Unverified Name)
I wonder why the administration didn't come to the students and ask US who we would have liked to see. While I'm sure Norm Dicks is a great politician, and my grandpa will probably be enthused to see his congressman, I'm pretty indifferent about this choice. I'm not from that district and really only just recognized the name from the media.
We have many outstanding members on our Board of Regents. I'm surprised none of them stepped up. Or how about someone one of our illustrious brand new buildings are named for... Allen, Gates... they're right around the corner. A local newscaster might have been interesting.
I'm really curious who dropped the ball on us though. Can someone at The Daily dig that up for us?
#7 Sean Kellogg
on May 17, 2007 at 6:57 p.m.(Santa Cruz, CA | Unverified Name)
Come'on guys, pay attention to the news. Norm Dicks is a serious player on the Appropriations Committee in the House. After our two Senators, Dicks is probably the most powerful politician in Washington State. Not only that, but he is hugely influential on defense issues. You know, the War in Iraq and all that.
I've graduated twice now. First time 2003, Sherman Alexi, who while a fine speaker, I didn't know him from Adam. Most recently, 2006, former EPA Director. Also, nice guy, but he had ZERO ties to the UW. Now you've got someone who is a UW alumni, big (no, HUGE) in state politics, influential on important issues of the day, and he wants to come speak. So he's not John Stewart; but then again, the UW is a state institution and establishment... it doesn't just pick a name out of a hat because it's flashy today.
Post a comment