The Daily of the University of Washington

Teaching the Bible in schools not taboo


Share

Going out on a limb of the pedagogy tree, I’m going to say that I think the Bible should be taught in American public high schools.

Texas is considering becoming the first state in the country to require all public high schools in the state to offer an elective course on the Bible. The elective would not be mandatory.

While it’s unfortunate this is first being proposed in one of the most conservative Christian states in the nation, which can possibly be interpreted as an effort of preaching, not teaching the Bible, it is nevertheless a good idea to offer high school students exposure to this and other religious texts.

Coming from me, a person who is definitely not Christian or even religious, my motivation for suggesting this is completely secular. Removing the Bible from the religious realm and teaching it in conjunction with history, literature and comparative religion, can only help today’s students gain a deeper understanding of their studies.

Anyone who suggests mixing public schools and religious discourse realizes how volatile this combination could be. The trick is to properly train teachers to teach religious texts, not indoctrinate students. It would be a dangerous conflict of interest for a Christian teacher to lead a class about the Bible.

I make this argument coming from some experience as a student in public school learning about the Bible.

In my high school AP literature class, we read the book of Job. Later, in college, I read Job again in conjunction with Homer’s ‘The Odyssey’ for a discussion about the Greek gods’ (or God’s) manipulation of humans.

Last spring, I took a Bible as Literature course through the UW’s English department and received a thorough eye-opening. This was the most convincing experience that affirmed the benefits of teaching the Bible in a non-religious setting.

I spent my childhood between Protestant and Catholic churches, and in my high-pressure Sunday schools, religion was crammed down my throat. It was impossible, in that setting, for me to separate the literature from the morality.

In the Bible class I took, the morality of the text was not allowed to be taught, so as to honor the separation of church and state our country so wisely requires. As a result, I was able to read almost the entire Bible cover to cover and learn about its major themes in a non-confrontational manner.

Having taken this class, I have learned two important things.

It is always preferable to read the source material rather than rely on other people’s explanation of the text. A religious service doesn’t appeal to me, but I found several books in the Bible that did, including Song of Solomon and Ecclesiastes, the basis for the famous Byrds song ‘Turn Turn Turn,’ famous for the “for everything, turn, turn, turn, there is a season” lyrics.

Secondly, having read the Bible, I realize just how influential to Western culture this text is. Our daily lives are filled with Biblical allusions. More importantly, perhaps, the classes that students are expected to take in high school are filled with references to the Bible. The number of examples of this is overwhelming and undeniable.

In literature classes, everything from Milton’s Paradise Lost to Melville and Hemingway’s novels refer to the Bible. Shakespeare alone uses hundreds of biblical references throughout his plays.

In history, monumental documents like the Declaration of Independence refer to the Bible, and some historical events were prompted by religious interpretation — the Crusades and the Salem witch trials, for example.

Even in pop culture, the Bible appears with remarkable frequency. The Matrix movies, for example, are chock full of biblical allusions. In TV shows like Desperate Housewives and The Simpsons, the Bible is referenced often.

Once the importance of the Bible to our culture is realized, there still remains the question of how to teach it in a way that is fair. It is hard to argue, regardless of how influential the Bible is, that schools should offer a single elective devoted entirely to studying the Bible as a cultural artifact. What about the world’s other major religions: Islam, Buddhism and Hinduism, just for starters?

The best solution is for schools to offer a comparative religion elective course in which the Bible is given slightly more focus than other religions because of its impact. Then, teachers in individual classes — art, literature, history — should pull excerpts from the Bible when their material references it. The result is a better, more well-rounded student than ever before.

High schoolers are the perfect students for this sort of education. They are just beginning to question their spirituality, their mortality and their way of interpreting the world. They have tons of questions and can always find the loophole in an argument. The more elective subjects offered in high schools, the better. Some schools already offer elective courses in sociology, psychology and anthropology — why not add comparative religion?

Reach columnist Amy Korst at opinion@thedaily.washington.edu.


6 Comments

#1 Will Erickson
(Edmonds, WA | Unverified Name)

on April 26, 2007 at 10:13 a.m.
Report this comment

There's no need to create a course specifically devoted to reading the bible. Just included the book on the list of novels a student can read for their fictional reading course. That's where the bible belongs anyways.

#2 Suzanne
(Salem, OR | Unverified Name)

on April 26, 2007 at 5:41 p.m.
Report this comment

"The best solution is for schools to offer a comparative religion elective course in which the Bible is given slightly more focus than other religions because of its impact."

I don't think I agree with giving the Bible more focus. A good arguement can be made that the Koran should be given more focus because the impact it has made could be considered larger than Christianity's. Heck an arguement could be made for putting greater focus onto a religion like Matrisism because so many more people have seen the whole of The Matrix compare with the number of people who have read the entire Bible.

A good comparative religions class should cover each religion and compare them. Thus the term "comparative religion".

#3 Joel Pierce
(Location Unknown | Unverified Name)

on April 26, 2007 at 9:33 p.m.
Report this comment

Thanks for this opinion piece. I enjoyed it and certainly agree that sacred texts do have a place alongside the classics in the public school curriculum, even if I ultimately disagree with creating such an elective course to study them. Still I found the following odd: "It would be a dangerous conflict of interest for a Christian teacher to lead a class about the Bible." Why? Implicit in this statement seems to be the assumption that if a teacher were a Christian they would somehow be unable to "teach religious texts, not indoctrinate students." Teachers always walk a fine line in deciding how much of their own viewpoint to disclose and inject into the curriculum, but a good teacher, even a Christian one, can discern when such disclosures are not appropriate and refrain.

#4 Joesel Goingo
(Legaspi, Philippines | Unverified Name)

on July 12, 2007 at 7:59 a.m.
Report this comment

The United States of America exists primarily because of the Bible. Teaching it in public schools throughout should be a must, even if only to give students insights on the roots of the nation.

#5 Elaine S.
(San Angelo, TX | Unverified Name)

on November 23, 2007 at 10:18 a.m.
Report this comment

I heartily agree with this entire passage, except, as Joel Pierce pointed out, why SHOULDN'T a Christian teacher teach the class? That's like saying, "We're offering an elective on Shakespeare, but the teacher should not be passionate about Shakespeare's writing. We don't want to give the students a false opinion about how important Shakespeare was." I appreciate the fact that you recognize how much of our classic literature alludes to this best-selling book of all time. Why would any school NOT want their students to understand the most classic of all literature? That's like saying, "We are not going to teach Shakespeare in our school because...well, basically, we don't want our children to learn about Shakespeare from a stranger...and, well, we don't share the same values Shakespeare had, so our children certainly should not be exposed to Shakespeare's values, and...well, times have changed so much since Shakespeare wrote that his writings are no long appropriate for today's students." Most scholars, regardless of their passion for Shakespeare, recognize his importance in education. His historical tragedies, comedic plays, emotional poetry, insight and wisdom are quoted throughout the modern literature that we read. However, as important as Shakespeare was in the world of literature, his writings did not help found the United States. It was not Shakespeare that drove men to the New World and gave them the courage to establish a revolutionary form of government. The men who signed our Declaration of Independence did not put their lives and fortunes on the line in the name of Shakespeare. Our public school system and the Universities of Harvard and Yale were not established in order to teach our students about Shakespeare. And yet, the very book, which did have this much impact on our nation has been singled out, more so than any other, as being harmful to our students. And teachers who happen to be passionate about the Bible must not in any way allow that enthusiasm to be passed on to our students. In fact, if we are going to allow students to hear anything at all about the Bible, we must lump it together with other "religious" books and give it just a cursory glance--as though this library of writings which spans 1,500 years of history, character analysis, poetry, maxims, and life deserves less instruction time than the writings of one man.

#6 Samuel
(Ottawa, Canada | Unverified Name)

on March 18, 2008 at 8:13 a.m.
Report this comment

Thanks for your devotion and motivation to bring sustain understanding the future of the youngsters to instruct them what God want them to be.
Foolishness is bound up in the heart of a child; The rod of discipline will remove it far from him. (Proverbs 22:15, [New American Standard Bible], NASB).
He who spares his rod hates his son, But he who loves him disciplines him diligently. (Proverbs 13:24, NASB).


Post a comment

Name:


(None, None | Unverified Name)
Login to verify your name

Email:


Required, but not shown.

Comment: