By
Brooke McKean
March 9, 2007
"You had to live — did live, from habit that became instinct — in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard ..." The world of George Orwell's 1984 has an extreme and frightening political system.
Many have compared the United States' current system to it, a system where someone can become a "thought-criminal."
Despite the extreme, much can be learned and applied to the United States from Orwell's authoritarian government and many other dangerous dictatorships. The national identification system, or "REAL ID Act" of 2005 and other forms of spying are a step in that direction.
I don't claim that the U.S. government will begin to torture and detain people because they thought wrong. However, I do fear the current political trend.
The REAL ID Act called for a national license, or a state driver's license that follows certain standards. Most requirements are insignificant except, "A common machine-readable technology, with defined minimum data elements."
Although the "minimum" is only typical reports of violations, this could include any data on any American that the government deems necessary.
This card would be necessary for boarding a plane and nearly every federal government service.
Jim Harper, Director of Information Policy Studies at the CATO Institute, said, "Having a national ID would promote a surveillance society that we should all dread."
Fortunately, Washington state has taken measures to stop the implementation of this act due to costs, predicted to amount to almost 2 billion in the next decade, and privacy concerns.
The bill, SB 5087, passed in January states, "The data collected would be subject to inaccuracies and susceptible to increased unauthorized disclosure as it would be shared among states."
Frighteningly similar to the TVs in every room in 1984, the Pentagon's Defense Science Board in its 2006 Summer Study called for "TiVo-like" systems that can record and rewind to capture the culprits of any event.
They use the example of a car bomb, yet to capture such an event, the government would need video cameras all over the United States. This desire to have "omnipresent knowledge" is frightening and convenient for catching any other mischief, illegal or not.
The Pentagon wants the ability to record and study every moment for potential "terrorist threats." But these plans could threaten the security, freedom and civil rights of the American people, not to mention the many immigrants that would be hindered by such bills.
Beyond the fiction of George Orwell, many states with national identification systems have used them for frightening purposes. Although a cliché case for many arguments, Hitler's Germany used identity cards to determine life and death. Similarly, identity cards drove the genocide in Rwanda.
Apartheid South Africa had many different forms of identity cards based on lineage, preventing anyone who wasn't purely white from living a free life. Many Third World countries require passports to cross internal regions, preventing many ethnic groups from accessing opportunities.
In China, the Hukou system provides identity cards to rural and urban residents. Until recently, rural residents were not allowed to find jobs in cities, forcing them to stay in rural poverty.
In many ways, the REAL ID and other observational systems are more frightening than other identity cards because Americans would have no idea what their licenses tell the government. These forms of observation could create government paranoia based on inaccurate information, hurting many innocent people.
Just as Orwell's character Winston was dragged to a torture chamber for thinking against the government, innocent Americans could be detained (possibly without a lawyer due to the PATRIOT Act) for being at the wrong place at the wrong time.
As students and University members, we should be especially concerned, as we comprise the historically rebellious group.
I believe the government should be acting to stop terrorism, but spying on 300 million Americans isn't going to solve anything. We shouldn't have to be afraid that our government is watching our every move, considering our every thought.
If these omnipresent privileges got into the wrong hands or a malicious government came to power, you had better watch your back.
Reach columnist Brooke McKean at opinion@thedaily.washington.edu.
2 Comments
#1 Bryan
on March 9, 2007 at 9:15 a.m.(UW Campus | Unverified Name)
"These forms of observation could create government paranoia based on inaccurate information, hurting many innocent people."
Could cause paranoia? Sounds like you are already there. Did the entire Daily Opinion staff just read 1984 or something? Honestly, this seems like the fourth or fifth Orwell related piece in as many weeks.
Maybe our generation really is more narcissistic if we actually think the federal government has nothing better to do than worry about what the hell we are doing on a daily basis. I hate to break it to you, but unless you are planning to cause harm to the nation, the federal government does not care about you at all. The FBI is not a bunch of creepy voyeurs with nothing better to do than watch regular folks walking down the street. The CIA has better things to do than listen to my phone calls, and if it doesn't, than I'm outraged at how much free time they have. The idea that the feds have some sort of interest in college students because they are historically rebellious is laughable. For you to think regular college kids at American universities even make a blip on the national security radar is foolish... that is, of course, unless you are a member of an organization that burns down horticulture buildings or something. Uncle Sam isn't watching your protest marches as long as they stay peaceful, and he doesn't care about your radical rhetoric as long as it isn't causing harm to other people. The bottom line is, you only need to watch your back if you have done something worthy of catching the federal government's attention. Talking tough simply doesn't make you interesting... it's crossing the line into harmful action, or conspiracy to cause harm that brings a swift kick in the butt. So get over yourself already.
#2 Heather Czerniak
on March 11, 2007 at 10:09 a.m.(Madison, WI | Unverified Name)
Bryan, if you do a little research into totalitarian states, you'd find that they are also extremely paranoid, more than they have a need to be. If our government can round up hundreds of detainees and place them at Guantanamo Bay, whether they are guilty of a crime or just guilty of being in the wrong place at the wrong time, then what's to stop them from doing the same thing to any of us?
"The idea that the feds have some sort of interest in college students because they are historically rebellious is laughable," you wrote. Bryan, there are folks in this world who thought they were doing nothing wrong, that is, until they filed an FOIA request with the federal government ten years later and were shocked at the data the FBI was keeping on them. I have a relative who wasn't even politically active in college in the late 60's, and the FBI had a folder on her three inches thick. Why? Because her dormmate in her freshman year dropped out of school two years later and joined a Marxist anti-war group. My aunt was being tagged just because they shared a dorm room for one year! And they barely got along anyway.
Yes, Bryan you and I have much to worry about. Don't think because your views are similar to those of the Bush Administration that you aren't being watched. It's all about control, and if they see you as a threat for whatever reason, you're theirs.
Post a comment