By
Readers of The Daily
February 23, 2007
Smith deserved the spotlight
Who is to say that Anna Nicole was not our Princess Diana, when our culture regards celebrities as such? (Sara Wilson, Feb. 20, “Anna Nicole Smith takes over the media”) Other countries inversely apply the phenomena, treating their royalty a lot like celebrities, like when Prince Harry got the media in a frenzy over his Hitler outfit.
Some cry “shame!” because the media has given too much attention to Smith’s death. Maybe her sensational death is a lot easier to handle than the thought of genocide. Perhaps the media is made up of private enterprises that know that ratings equal money, or maybe people liked the randomly mirthful and opulent Smith. If people were only interested in uber-serious coverage, there would be a higher demand for Katie Couric bobble-heads.
Serious broadcasting is not a waste, nor should the media should forever milk the celebrity cash cow. But Smith’s death deserves more than a brief interlude. There’s a saying that goes something like, “Public opinion regulates public opinion,” i.e. if it’s not what the public wants then it wouldn’t be on TV.
Some may have considered her repugnant, but her life directly affected many lives. Her precedent-setting lawsuit regarding J. Howard Marshall’s estate reached the Supreme Court — where the justices ruled unanimously in her favor.
So, to Anna Nicole: you’re as newsworthy as Michael Jackson, Monica Lewinsky, and The Heaven’s Gate Cult. Besides, I can always change the channel.
Elizabeth St Clair
Junior, French
Dixie Chicks deserved a better ‘toon
Jordan Rudd created a far from entertaining illustration in the Feb. 20th edition of The Daily. While ribbing at the idea that the Dixie Chicks won an award simply for bashing the president, he failed to realize their deeper message earned them that acclaim.
Their album received increased attention since the hit track focused on the backlash they received after lead singer Natalie Maines spoke out against the president. Doesn’t music win awards for musical appeal, and more importantly, the statement it makes? Country music is about the American way of life, and since the Dixie Chicks boldly exposed a more ugly part of it, their five awards should not be seen as any less meaningful.
Cory Farren
Senior, public health
Black History month and Tully’s
After reading the staff editorial on Black History month (Feb. 21, “Reflecting on the necessity of Black History month”), I couldn’t help but notice that February is also Tully’s “Celebrating Chocolate Month.” Hopefully this is an unfortunate coincidence.
Nick Colonnese
Junior, mechanical engineering
Editor’s note: The Opinion Editor personally called Tully’s headquarters to investigate, and they assured The Daily that they are celebrating chocolate this month as a nod to Valentine’s Day, and not to Black history.
4 Comments
#1 Pascal Clark
on February 23, 2007 at 7:53 a.m.(Bellevue, WA | Unverified Name)
Who's to say that Anna Nicole was not our Princess Diana? I am.
#2 Uhh
on February 23, 2007 at 8:39 a.m.(Location Unknown | Unverified Name)
Your comment is confusing.
Are you saying that the death of Anna Nicole has had the same type of impact on the world as the death of Princess Diana? Please elaborate.
#3 UW Student
on February 23, 2007 at 6:49 p.m.(Kent, WA | Unverified Name)
Nice thoughts St. Clair
#4 D.B.
on February 25, 2007 at 5:17 p.m.(Elk, WA | Unverified Name)
Princess Diana was princess diana, Anna Nicole was anna nicole. Why are we evening attemping to compare the two, they were different people with different impacts on the world.
Post a comment