By
Brian Slodysko
February 16, 2007
Dressed in purple and white UW Lobby Day T-shirts, students left the bus and walked straight to an empty conference room in the state's capitol. Wires dangled from the walls and the fluorescent lights flickered, but nobody came to meet the students.
They were stood up.
Instead of meeting with King County Sen. Cheryl Pflug as expected, students attending the UW's annual event instead met with her aide, who listened to student concerns including accessible and affordable childcare for student-parents, unaffordable tuition increases and exempting sales tax on textbooks, to name a few.
More than 120 UW students participated in Lobby Day, splitting off into small groups for meetings with legislators. Most said they had a good experience, but absentee lawmakers seemed to be a consistent theme.
"Well, do I feel slighted?" said senior Andrew Everett. "Yes. But am I up in arms? We're students."
While taking shelter from the rain in a tent pitched next to the capitol building, a group of students argued over the importance of their meetings with legislators.
"Honestly, when given the choice between making good policy and talking to me, go ahead, do your thing," junior Alex Bond said.
But Bond was interrupted before he finished his thought.
"First of all, that guy was off doing media stuff instead of keeping his appointment," said Schuyler Dunphy about an unnamed legislator.
Bond noted lawmakers have better things to do than meet with students.
"Well, he was ... doing a TV interview," Bond said. "He's not gonna be like, 'Oh sorry, I'm gonna walk right out of this TV interview so I can talk to a bunch of kids.'"
Young voters are often marginalized by politicians because they don't participate in elections.
Statistics show nationwide, less than half of the 18-to-24-year-old population voted in the 2004 election. While this number is more than double the amount that participated in the 2000 election, it is dwarfed by participation rates among older age groups.
"The lowest voter turnout, if you do a map of voter turnout and voter registration in the 43rd [district], is in the U-District," said Sen. Ed Murray, D-Seattle.
One of Lobby Day's main enthusiasts in the Legislature, Rep. Dave Upthegrove, said student participation in the legislative process is an important step in convincing lawmakers of young voters' sway as a constituency group.
A senate committee hearing on funding for student childcare was the centerpiece of the day's lobbying efforts.
Opio Dupree, a UW doctoral candidate, said after a monthly childcare bill of $1,000, paying rent and buying food, he and his wife have $250 left over for cost-of-living expenses.
"When you're trying to figure out how to pay rent or feed your family, it is difficult to prepare for exams," he said. "No one should have to make the choice to better themselves through education or feed their family."
Later in the day, Washington Secretary of State Sam Reid and Rep. Hans Dunshee, D-Snohomish, addressed students at a rally on the steps of the capitol building.
"Education spending is going down, the environment is going south and other countries are beating us economically. You should be ticked," Dunshee said.
After his address, Reid said Lobby Day is essential to putting a face on an underrepresented age group. Personalizing the legislative process can only help in creating more informed and active citizens, he said.
"Lawmakers meet with lobbyists and other special interest groups all the time," he said. "Students need to get their voice in there too."
Reach reporter Brian Slodysko at news@thedaily.washington.edu.
3 Comments
#1 Doug McManaway
on February 16, 2007 at 1:38 a.m.(UW Campus | Unverified Name)
It seems the author made it seem so negative and futile that we're trying to express our opinion to our lawmakers. While there were a lot of difficulties felt by many students, there are a lot of positive impacts made by Lobby Day. For instance, while the committee hearing on SB 5782 was discussed, I don't think the huge impact we made on the members of the Higher Education Committee by being in that room was highlighted at all in contrast to the negative feelings about representatives and senators giving us the time of day. The chair of the committee made it very clear that he was impressed by the sheer number of UW students present and those who had signed their names in support of the bill. He even proceeded to read every single person's name off, regardless of whether they had testified. I don't know precisely how many names were read, but I would venture a guess of at least thirty.
Personally I wished The Daily did not make it seem like it's not worthwhile to go to Lobby Day. If people read this and think, "oh you don't even get to talk to your legislators half the time, why bother," then they will not be interested in attending. The more people attend and the more voters from the 18-24 age group make their voices heard, the more the government and our lawmakers will want to hear what we have to say.
#2 HankW
on February 16, 2007 at 8:46 a.m.(Location Unknown | Unverified Name)
They just wanted the an attention grabber headline.
You're 100% right though.
#3 Hannah Lommers-Johnson
on February 16, 2007 at 12:10 p.m.(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)
I agree with Doug's comments above. While any interaction students have with the Legislature will be constantly overshadowed by the fact that many students do not vote, student participation in events like Lobby Day is that much more important to show legislators that students are politically active, we know how the legislators are affecting us, and we will keep them accountable.
Yesterday countless legislative aides commented that they had never seen so many people around the capitol campus for one group's lobby day. Many legislators also went out of their way to recognize the students. Representative Hans Dunshee who had expected to not be able to speak at the rally, somehow cleared his schedule to be able to come and adress students. In addition to the recognition students recieved that Doug spoke of in the Senate Committee on HIgher Ed Hearing, students were also recongized and applauded in the House's equivalent. The many legislators who met with and observed students around the Capitol are now that much more closer to considering students to be politically active and considering our needs before they legislate.
Clearly, there are many sides to the Lobby Day story, and it is interesting that year after year the Daily chooses to take a distinctly negative tone in the articles that follow up UW Lobby Day. At least this year, the Daily reporter who wrote the story attended Lobby Day, which is somewhat impressive considering that last year an even more critical article was written by a reporter who did not bother.
Post a comment