The Daily of the University of Washington

Letters to the Editor


Catholic pharmacists shouldn't be forced to break morals

Chris Heide's opinion piece ["Pharmacists shouldn't have choice in selling contraceptives," Nov. 2] demonstrates a common lack of understanding of the Christian Catholic faith, leading him to come to the conclusion that the pope's urging constitutes an order for pharmacists to force their views upon others in an effort to effectively ban contraceptives in the United States.

Because the Catholic Church believes abortion is the killing of an entity, which has a human soul, selling medicine that would do this equates to quasi-participation in the act. Although the Church's view on abortion is prevalent here, this specific urging is in regards to Catholics who are enabling an immoral act and has little to do with the consumer, especially since there are plenty of non-Catholic pharmacists.

Secondly, this is a suggestion and not an order. There is no canon law against selling contraceptives and the pope is not using his power of infallibility (That's only happened once, ever). Therefore, this particular statement holds as much dogmatic weight as the pope saying which book of the Bible he likes most.

And finally, how can you demand a Catholic to quit his or her job when 99 percent of it is wholly positive and they only disagree with one act? How can you fault a soldier for joining the military to protect his country and then refusing to kill an innocent civilian? It is one and the same for the Catholic faithful. Don't insult their values.

—Ryan Fishburn

Senior, political science & international studies

Iraq protest disrespects fallen heroes

This is in response to the organizers of the event held in the Quad and HUB lawns.

While the war in Iraq may definitely have been started on unsubstantiated evidence, it does not belittle the importance of our troops' presence in the country.America exists not just as a nation state, but also as an idea that is spread around the world, existing in the hearts and minds of free peoples or those that long to be free.

Our fallen heroes that died in Iraq should not be degraded, or the symbol of their sacrifice taken in a dishonorable context.The statements of "ending the war now" directly disrespect those that have given their lives to the freedom of a previously dictatorially oppressed people, and the soldiers that have fallen before them that gave us the freedoms we so freely enjoy.

Just remember that when you are walking through the Northwest Arlington Cemetery, you aren't looking at "innocent" lives taken in a vain war. You are looking at a direct symbol of those who have sacrificed themselves, the families that have lost loved ones and all those who are now free in a struggling democratic Iraq. Calling for a "removal of troops now" directly goes against all the progress, and all the good that the soldiers of the United States of America have done to the free people of Iraq, regardless of your political persuasion.

—Cody Jorgensen

Junior, biochemistry


9 Comments

#1 Micah Babinski
(UW Campus | Unverified Name)

on November 5, 2007 at 11:16 a.m.
Report this comment

In response to the "Iraq Protests Disrespects Fallen Heroes" letter:

The sentiment that we should end the war now does not "directly disrespect" fallen soldiers, as your letter suggests.

Direct disrespect would come in the form of a statement like, "US soldiers and marines in Iraq don't need fully armored vehicles," or "US soldiers and marines in Iraq exaggerate the effects of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder," or "It's ok that the Bush administration changed its justification for sacrificing the lives of US soldiers and marines because no WMDs were ever found."

#2 Joshua Farris
(UW Campus | Unverified Name)

on November 5, 2007 at 7:33 p.m.
Report this comment

This is in response to negative criticism directed at last Friday’s memorial.

I’m an Iraq occupation veteran and founding member of the new Washington Huskies Against Military Occupation in Iraq (WHAMO for short). War is horrible and should never happen, but in reality war does happen. And we should do everything in our power to prevent them and bring them to an end.

Chicken hawks love their yellow ribbons and talk about the necessary just wars while they lacking the courage to fight them or sacrifice anything in the current war effort, they criticize decent folk who want to bring it to an end. It’s a cartoon view of the world and we’ve got to get away from it. Nothing makes me more sick.

Arlington Northwest is meant to honor our soldiers while it attempts to bring some glimpse of the reality home. We setup 3,843 markers for all of the US soldiers who had been killed as of Friday, but it would have been impossible for us to setup one million markers for all the Iraqis. It’s time for us to set aside our partisan politics and passions. It’s time to take an emotionless critical look at the situation. Our presence in Iraq inflames the violence, terrorism has increased, the occupation is illegal, and all the while the war costs continue to grow. This is not a leftwing or rightwing opinion, for both Denis Kucinich and Pat Buchanan both want us to leave.

Our soldiers have done their job and it’s time to bring them home. I think folks that don’t believe this at this point are downright un-American. If anyone's interested, WHAMO meets every Thursday at 6pm in the Hub, room 209b.

-Joshua Farris
Junior, History

#3 lucas carter
(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)

on November 5, 2007 at 8:18 p.m.
Report this comment

America is no more free or not free than any other country in the world. The great circulation of wealth in this country may lead the declining middle class to believe that our country is "freer' than other countries. However, our political and social freedoms do not stand out from any other country. In fact, in some ways we are considerably worse off than other industrialized nations with our huge prison population, lack of social welfare, lack of healthcare, unrepresentive government, ect.. what could we possibly impart in the way of freedom to a country with history like Iraq?

War also has nothing to do with imparting freedom. It is a socio-economic function of desperation that governments resort to when other tactics have failed.

As for disrespecting the alleged sacrifice of American Soldiers, the facts speak for themselves. Nearly 4000 U.S. soldiers dead, a roughly estimated 100,000 Iraqis dead, and a giant 'free for all' civil war in the what was once the cradle of civilization. Pointing out obvious facts does no disrespect to anyone, it just sheds light on the truth.

Lucas Carter
shipwrights local 1184

#4 Jack Range
(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)

on November 5, 2007 at 8:21 p.m.
Report this comment

The above two comments are right on target. Beyond troop withdrawal not being a left/right issue, it doesn't even seem to be a neo-liberal platform anymore.

Thomas Friedman, author of "The World is Flat" and "The Lexus and the Olive Tree", recently said so himself on the Colbert Report.

http://www.comedycentral.com/motherlo...

With liberals, conservatives, neo-liberals, realists, and everyone else speaking out against the war, our elected officials need to catch on.

Let's make that happen.

#5 Nicholas Tichy
(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)

on November 5, 2007 at 8:25 p.m.
Report this comment

In response to the "Iraq Protests Disrespects Fallen Heroes" letter:

To those who suggest that speaking out against the war in Iraq is paramount to “not supporting the troops,” I wish to respond.
• Sending troops into battle to kill and be killed under false pretenses and in an illegal war does not support the troops.
• Sending troops into a war with no planning for the peace, or lack thereof, is not supporting the troops.
• Sending troops into battle without the proper supplies to keep from being killed or wounded does not support the troops.
• Sending reserves to fight on the front line and pushing our volunteer force to its brink is not supporting the troops.
• Keeping troops in the middle of a bloody civil war for the sake of saving face is not supporting the troops.
The argument is often made that to speak out in times of war is to undermine unity during a time of crisis. However, it is during these times, when lives are literally on the line every passing moment, that dissent and questioning our leaders is most necessary. The stakes are too high to pass on our responsibility as informed citizens. It is exactly because of the sacrifice of our troops that many of us feel the need to speak out against the war. In my mind, there is no greater act of support for them than that.

Nicholas Tichy
Junior, Political Science & Journalism

#6 Joshua Farris
(UW Campus | Unverified Name)

on November 5, 2007 at 8:31 p.m.
Report this comment

This is in response to negative criticism directed at last Friday’s Memorial.

I’m an Iraq occupation veteran and founding member of the Washington Huskies Against Military Occupation in Iraq. War is horrible and should never happen, but in reality war does happen. And we should do everything in our power to prevent and bring them to an end.

Chicken hawks love their yellow ribbons and talk about the necessary just wars while not wanting to fight or even sacrifice in the current war effort, they criticize decent folk that want it to end. This is a cartoon view of the world and we’ve got to get away from it. Nothing is worse than these politics.

Arlington Northwest is meant to honor our soldiers while it attempts to bring some glimpse of the reality home. We setup 3,843 markers for all of the US soldiers who had been killed as of Friday, but it would have been impossible for us to setup one million markers for all the Iraqis. It’s time for us to step away from our partisan politics and passions. It’s time to take an emotionless look at the situation. Our presence in Iraq inflames the violence, terrorism has increased, the occupation is illegal, and all the while the war costs continue to grow. This is neither a left nor rightwing opinion anymore, for both Denis Kucinich and Pat Buchanan both want us to leave.

Our soldiers have done their job and it’s time to bring them home. I think folks that don’t believe it at this point are downright un-American.

-Joshua Farris
Junior, history

#7 Gunnel Clark
(Bellevue, WA | Unverified Name)

on November 5, 2007 at 8:44 p.m.
Report this comment

In response to the "Iraq Protests Disrespects Fallen Heroes" letter:
Yes, our troops are being dishonored, but not by a memorial which commemorates the fallen and reminds people that our young soldiers are dying while we're blithely going about our daily lives.
We are involved in a quagmire in Iraq which cannot be solved militarily. This administration was determined to depose Sadam Hussein. Intelligence was fabricated to sell the American people a bill of goods. Our troops were and are being sent into an illegal war that should never have happened in the first place. The war has become a breeding ground for terrorism. Our standing in the world community has fallen to an all-time low because of our occupation of Iraq. This is dishonoring our troops.

#8 Bob Lavowsky
(Everett, WA | Unverified Name)

on April 29, 2008 at 12:50 p.m.
Report this comment

I LOVE WSU!!!!! Go Cougs

#9 Banana Hammick
(Everett, WA | Unverified Name)

on April 29, 2008 at 12:53 p.m.
Report this comment

ohhh ya. whoever wrote this letter is a hottie. :)


Post a comment

Name:


(None, None | Unverified Name)
Login to verify your name

Email:


Required, but not shown.

Comment: