The Daily of the University of Washington

Knox's state of mind called into question


Amanda Knox, the UW student held in custody in Italy for her possible role in the murder of her British roommate, is as puzzled as the rest of us, according to a Nov. 22 article in London's The Times ("I am confused but I didn't cut Meredith's throat, says flatmate").

"I have serious doubts about the truth of my declarations," she said in an alleged document leaked to Italian newspapers, according to the Times article. "This is all very strange, I know, but what happened is as confusing for me as anyone else."

In the document, Knox admitted to smoking marijuana with Italian student Raffaele Sollecito that day, which, she conceded, is partly why she is "very confused," but her memories are also jumbled because she said she is "in a state of shock and exhausted."

Knox's statements about her involvement in Meredith Kercher's death Nov. 1 have been conflicting thus far.

In various versions of the event she has placed herself at the house she shared with Kercher, where she thought she heard former suspect Diya "Patrick" Lumumba kill her roommate, and in other versions she claims to have been at Sollecito's apartment. All three had been named suspects in the case until recently, when Lumumba was released due to a lack of evidence tying him to the murder.

Lumumba has said that Knox's statements condemning him will haunt him forever.

"I don't even think she is evil," Lumumba said to London's Sunday Mirror Nov. 25. "To be evil you have to have a soul. Amanda's empty, dead, inside. She's the ultimate actress, able to switch her emotions on and off in an instant."

In Knox's statement, she said her only certainty "is that I did not kill Meredith," and that police must believe her, even though she understands why they do not since "there are parts of my story which don't make sense." She said she understands the stress the police are under.

"With the way the truth appears in my mind there is no way to verify [Lumumba as the murderer], because I don't even remember with certainty that I was there," she said.

In a letter to his father, Sollecito, who also maintains his innocence, said that Knox lives in a dream world.

"I don't think that Amanda is a killer," he said, according to a Nov. 23 article in La Repubblica ("Raffaele vuole essere ascoltato dal pm e scrive: 'Amanda non assassina'"). "Amanda is unable to separate reality from a dream. But I don't believe she has killed [anyone]. I hope that the police discover the real killer because Meredith didn't deserve the end that she had."

Knox, on her part, didn't think Sollecito killed Kercher either.

"I don't think Raffaele killed Meredith, but I think he's terrified like me," she said in the statement. "And now he's trying to find a way out by distancing himself from me."

Knox called her memories "surreal" and questioned herself whether they were dreams or reality.

"Everything I have said about my involvement in the death of Meredith, even if contradictory, is the best version of the truth I am capable of thinking," she said. "There's something inside me which I think is true, but then there is another possibility which could also be true. I honestly do not know which is the real truth."

[Reach reporter Arla Shephard at news@thedaily.washington.edu.]


42 Comments

#1 Lanky
(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)

on November 26, 2007 at 11:05 p.m.
Report this comment

We love you Amanda. Stay strong.

#2 George Hickley
(Melbourne, Australia | Unverified Name)

on November 26, 2007 at 11:22 p.m.
Report this comment

What a shame such a beautiful girl as Meredith had to die to satisfy the perversions of amoral lowlifes.

#3 Sam Klein
(Chengdu, China | Unverified Name)

on November 27, 2007 at 12:15 a.m.
Report this comment

i would like to say this: much of what is in the news are only tidbits and half-truths that reporters have put together. they (the media) have ripped her life apart in their search for "dirt". they take things out of context and things that are truly harmless, and turn them into comments that have hurt her friends and family very deeply. the truth will come out eventually. i am confident everyone will find that Amanda was nothing more than a good person caught in an extremely unfortunate situation. She most certainly is not soul-less. she has the most soul of anyone i know.
-Someone who knows
p.s. what if this was your friend/daughter?

#4 Elai
(Stoke-on-trent, United Kingdom | Unverified Name)

on November 27, 2007 at 1:23 a.m.
Report this comment

.. and what if Meredith was your friend/daughter?
I don't think blaming the press solves anything, they are the press this is what they do with everything- try to find the story.
The are concentrating on this story as one of the key people in a horrific murder has stated several completely different accounts of events which could give so many crucial answers.
The police need to find answers.
What Amanda is going through is nothing compared to that of the victims in all of this, Meredith, her family and loved ones. They never get an ending to their pain or answers to their questions. No one should forget that.

#5 abc
(New York, NY | Unverified Name)

on November 27, 2007 at 5:16 a.m.
Report this comment

Those of you who know Amanda may find yourselves surprised in the end. Look at the evidence/facts (not the press/tabloid reports that twist things)and what she herself has said, and it is fairly obvious that she had something to do with that poor girl's death. And it was not just her sitting in the kitchen covering her ears. Thus, "good person in bad situation" is highly, highly unlikely in the case of Miss Knox.

RIP Meredith and peace to her family.

#6 avid observer
(Omaha, NE | Unverified Name)

on November 27, 2007 at 6:29 a.m.
Report this comment

this girl just thinks like most college aged kids...that they will never get caught and there are no repercussions for their actions...we've all been that age and unfortunately she did something that was more sinister than normal 22 year old hijinks

#7 Snow D.
(Sadieville, KY | Unverified Name)

on November 27, 2007 at 7:12 a.m.
Report this comment

abc - "Look at the evidence/facts (not the press/tabloid reports that twist things)"
The truth is that Noboday can look at the facts right now.
Because everything we read is twisted by the press and tabloids. Why is it so obvious she had something to do with the girl's death? Because she does drugs and she sleeps around and she is a fun-seeker? You know so many college kids are like that. Not that I think they are great but it doesn't mean they will kill someone. There are NO, repeat, NO HARD EVIDENCE suggests she killed her.
Nobody clearly explained any real events that happened there that night. I don't even know this Seattle girl but I can see this witch hunting happening as it's exciting!
She was a rich kid and carefree (who isn't at 20yrs old?)
but look at her, she was an evil! Sure, Meredith should not die but I really don't think Amanda should be fried either.

#8 Brian
(Burlington, WA | Unverified Name)

on November 27, 2007 at 8:38 a.m.
Report this comment

I agree with most of you in that they need to find the truth, for the sake of the Kercher Family and many others, but all the stories going around have continually messed with the truth in trying to find the truth. Now, think about this for a second. What if you were in Amanda's shoes? You're in a foreign country and you come home to find your roommate murdered. You are taken in for questioning, and are held for 24+ hours without anything but cigarettes being offered. What would your reaction be? You are then taken in as a suspect for interrogation while also being held in solitary confinement. To make maters even worse imagine being held that way for 48 hours with only cigarettes, and maybe water, being offered. Would you be able to think straight! Next add in a little bit of pushing and shoving from someone speaking another language, maybe a little hit to the head when they don’t understand you while in interrogation. Are you still thinking straight? Lastly, put in translation, and complete context, could what you say be misinterpreted under these conditions and circumstances? Could your words be construed incorrectly to make a story and give the police a suspect based on what they want to hear?

Again, this in only one interpretation, and not necessarily the truth, what is the truth, does Amanda even know the truth in regards to Kercher, or was she hanging out in a completely different place while high on life (and cannabis). Many of us believe that she knows more than has been shared to the public, but that doesn’t make her guilty. In America we need to remember that one is innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around, as it seems to be in Italy, and the press.

#9 anon
(Downey, CA | Unverified Name)

on November 28, 2007 at 12:41 p.m.
Report this comment

Does anybody at UW know if Amanda is right or left handed? Has a defense fund been set up?

#10 Mike Hunt
(Felixstowe, United Kingdom | Unverified Name)

on November 28, 2007 at 3:58 p.m.
Report this comment

> In America we need to remember that one is innocent until
> proven guilty, not the other way around, as it seems to be
> in Italy, and the press.

Right on. It's totally like, "land of the free", dude. Eyeties shoulda used hoods or dogs or waterboarded the bitch, that would've helped her shaky memory.

But of course, they don't do that in Yurp ...

#11 Frank
(London, United Kingdom | Unverified Name)

on November 30, 2007 at 3:30 a.m.
Report this comment

To sam klein and all those people that know Foxy Knoxy I say that you people are deluded. Regardless of the precise facts around this case it is clear that Foxy Knoxy was involved in the murder. It appears from what we know that she was involved in drug use and 'extreme' sex. If you (Foxy's friends) haven't noticed this isn't as uncommon as you think. Middle class (read: rich) white americans with a sense of entitlement going to foreign destinations with the single pursuit of pleasure...is that really such a hard concept to grasp. Just read your newspapers or watch your television or go to the cinema (see the popularity of horror porn). It is all around us. Moral depravity right there in the good old USA. I am incensed at how arrogant the people in the US appear to be about this girl. She is as Patrick says soulless. She doesn't give a toss about Meredith and from accounts she was jealous of her. I do not find it hard to believe that she wouldn't have cared if Meredith lived or died. I am extremely excited to see this girl go down and spend the rest of her life in a squalid italian jail.

#12 Roz
(New York, NY | Unverified Name)

on November 30, 2007 at 10:14 a.m.
Report this comment

Brian-you are right. It is guilty until proven innocent in the country of Italy. I studied abroad in Rome one summer, and that was pounded into mine and my fellow students heads before we went.

#13 anon
(Downey, CA | Unverified Name)

on November 30, 2007 at 2:56 p.m.
Report this comment

Tough luck that Amanda didn't get the urge at UW...

#14 Angeleno
(Downey, CA | Unverified Name)

on November 30, 2007 at 2:57 p.m.
Report this comment

Too bad Amanda didn't get these urges in Seattle.

#15 Friends of Amanda
(UW Campus | Unverified Name)

on December 2, 2007 at 2:20 p.m.
Report this comment

Friends of Amanda - 12/02/07

Dearest Amanda,
We love you so much and hope you're okay. Sorry every one is making up stories about who you are - it's insane what people can make up by misinterpreting a photograph or a story, huh? Though I must say, it is pretty funny to imagine you as a drunken, slutty, pothead. Yeah - this is ridiculous. I'm not sure how you can take a beautiful, kind, energetic, loving, sensitive, outdoorsy, rock-climbing, yoga-doing, smiley, bouncy, academic, wonderful girl and portray her as a lunatic with no soul. Well dear, we've got your back, and we know who you really are. Love you so much,
-you know who we are

#16 Gregory Carlin
(Belfast, United Kingdom | Unverified Name)

on December 2, 2007 at 9:12 p.m.
Report this comment

"i am confident everyone will find that Amanda was nothing more than a good person caught in an extremely unfortunate situation."

Only in a white cashed-up gated community. Amanda Knox is a police officer's nightmare.

No, quite the reverse, I think they will be making a movie about how wicked she is.

I am also pretty sure that the cops in WA are keeping other stuff under wraps. She didn't just go crazy in Perugia, the drugs & promiscuity were part of her character long before she got to Italy.

#17 Gregory
(Belfast, United Kingdom | Unverified Name)

on December 2, 2007 at 9:20 p.m.
Report this comment

"What if you were in Amanda's shoes? You're in a foreign country and you come home to find your roommate murdered. You are taken in for questioning, and are held for 24+ hours without anything but cigarettes being offered. What would your reaction be?"

Finger a Congolese or some other convenient negro for the crime? That is what Ms Knox did.

It was so, well, it was so like WA really. It really was. True to her roots.

I an remember a black fellow being disciplined & walked across the yard for sexual abuse at Snohomish County Jail.

The white guards got away with it because they were white.

#18 Joey Yurp
(Belfast, United Kingdom | Unverified Name)

on December 2, 2007 at 9:31 p.m.
Report this comment

"Has a defense fund been set up?"

Yeah, we are meeting at Rick's Strip Club as soon as we shake off the feds

#19 Madison
(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)

on December 2, 2007 at 10:03 p.m.
Report this comment

GREGORY CARLIN
Funny - none of us remember you hanging out with Amanda when she was here. It's so wonderful that you obviously knew her so well! At an end-of-the-year house party the cops showed up for a noise complaint, and she was the only one to talk to them because she was the only one not drunk. Therefore, she got the citation but every one paid for it (her only encounter with the cops) - but I'm sure you knew that because you were obviously so close to her. Just like how you mentioned her promiscuity - you are absolutely right! Three boyfriends in two years is just out of control! What was she thinking? Oh, and her drug problem! My goodness - going to a party once or twice a quarter? Now that is some one who obviously needs help. Just amazing that she was able to apparantly be so into drugs, yet still exercise on a daily basis and be in amazing physical health, while maining a good GPA and getting on the dean's list, and working two jobs. Based on all your statements, you must have known her, seeing as you are making claims about her character. Strange that I was with her on a daily basis and never met you. That's so weird that Amanda and I spent so much time together, and some how you know her so much better than I do. You know, I'd love to hear about how you two met!

#20 Alexandra
(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)

on December 2, 2007 at 10:59 p.m.
Report this comment

Frank,
I'm sorry you feel that we as amanda's friends are deluded... However, I am more sorry that you are buying into the fabrication that the media is writing about amanda considering drugs, alcohol, and sex. What are your sources? And, what are their sources? Because, as a friend, I would love to see them... I wont deny that American culture is crude at times, but that culture has nothing to do with Amanda.. Amanda was an incredibly beautiful person, who inspired other people to be as hopeful as she was. I hope for Meredith's sake that the true criminal is found, because that is how justice will be served...

#21 Italian
(Barcelona, Spain | Unverified Name)

on December 3, 2007 at 2:36 a.m.
Report this comment

All you Knox apologists should perhaps start come to terms with the damning evidence deposited in court by the prosecutors. These are not tabloid speculations. A CCTV camera recorded Knox entering the house minutes before the murder. The victim's DNA and Knox's DNA were found on a knife at Sollecito's house, that had been cleaned with bleach. Knox was caught on tape admitting to her mother that she was in the house at the time of the murder.

You should also admit to yourself that Knox has lied repeatedly, she has accused an innocent man, and only when Lumumba was released for lack of evidence, she
"apologized". Is this the behavior of an innocent person? The day the body was found she gigglingly went shopping for lingerie with her boyfriend, as documented by the shop's camera. If you think this is an amazing person than you scare me.

#22 Madison
(UW Campus | Unverified Name)

on December 3, 2007 at 9:32 a.m.
Report this comment

Italian
Did you ever stop to think why none of us have seen that video footage of Amanda supposedly entering the crime scene? If it was accepted by the judge as evidence, you know damn well it would be all over the media. Furthmore, this video would have been mentioned at the hearing, but it was not, because it was thrown out as evidence. Why? Because you could not tell who was in the video. And DNA? It is skin DNA, not blood DNA - so here we have proof that both Amanda and Meredith used the same kitchen knife (gasp). Bleach? Why don't the police jump on this if it is valid - cleaning a knife in the dishwasher can leave traces of bleach on it - if this were hard evidence, you know the police would never stop mentioning it. And have you read the context in which Amanda admitted to her mother that she was at the house? "It's stupid...I was there. I can't lie about that" - something to that affect. Amanda was talking about being at Raffaele's house - why is no one showing the entire context of the quote? Well, why do you think? Amanda lying? Read her letter to the police about how they interrogated her. What she told them about her being at Raffaele's is true - nothing else came out until she was hit by the police. She never accused Patrick, she never said she was in the kitchen covering her ears. She told them what she imagined herself doing based on the fact that they lied about the evidence and told her there was DNA proof that she was there (they said this before any DNA testing was done). Much should be questioned about the police's method of interrogation and getting names from people, then claiming they were accused. Read her letter. And she was not shopping for lengerie - no one was allowed back in the house, and Amanda had no underware. She was simply buying underware - the whole sex talk and lengerie part of that story was made up by the media. If Amanda had been caught talking about sex on the shop camera, again, you know damn well it would have been all over the trashy media sites. I don't see how any one could question that - it would be all over if it were true. But it's not.
Amanda is an amazing person - the fact that people are so willing to believe such ridiculous things without questioning them scares me.

#23 Lindsay
(UW Campus | Unverified Name)

on December 3, 2007 at 10:53 a.m.
Report this comment

Alexandra,
I, too, would love to see these sources. No one is citing anything they write, whether it is about Amanda's character or the trial itself. This seems like a case where people believe what they want to because. A story about sex, drugs, murder, betrayal - just too juicy to pass up. The whole thing is too ridiculous to believe, which is why I try to find sources, references, anything - but there's none. It would appear that most of what is written is made up or taken out of context. If it weren't, then we would be able to find the sources.

#24 Alexandra
(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)

on December 3, 2007 at 1:15 p.m.
Report this comment

Thank you Madison for presenting the real context of the "facts" we've all read... Believe it or not, the newspapers and television loves a sensational story... Everyone needs to focus on the TRUE facts of the case rather than character bash a person they have never met...

#25 Natalie
(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)

on December 3, 2007 at 1:30 p.m.
Report this comment

Alexandra
What? - the newspaper love a sensational story? ...it would appear that you are one of the few people to remember that.
If there's not enough evidence, what do we do? Bash the hell out of her character so we can still print something in the paper. Whatever sells, right? I have been following this story and cannot believe how many people are unwilling to see what the media is doing. Good person, bad person? - who knows. Murderer, innocent? Again, who knows? But it is so blatantly obvious that the media is turning her into whatever sales. Nice to see some one else realizes that. But, as for every one else, they'll believe what they read because it's so much easier than questioning things. I mean, goodness, if the media lied about this, then...then what does that mean about everything else they write?...no...it cannot be...

#26 Friends of Amanda
(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)

on December 3, 2007 at 1:31 p.m.
Report this comment

Dearest Amanda,
We love you so much and hope you're okay. Sorry every one is making up stories about who you are - it's insane what people can make up by misinterpreting a photograph or a story, huh? Though I must say, it is pretty funny to imagine you as a drunken, slutty, pothead. Yeah - this is ridiculous. I'm not sure how you can take a beautiful, kind, energetic, loving, sensitive, outdoorsy, rock-climbing, yoga-doing, smiley, bouncy, academic, wonderful girl and portray her as a lunatic with no soul. Well dear, we've got your back, and we know who you really are. Love you so much,
-you know who we are

#27 Italian
(Barcelona, Spain | Unverified Name)

on December 3, 2007 at 3:08 p.m.
Report this comment

Madison,
do you think the police has released all the evidence they have? Why should they? At the last hearing they only had to present sufficient evidence to convince the judge to keep
the accused in jail. They presented the bugged conversation of Knox with her mother, which contradicted Knox's statement to the judge and that was enough. If there was any doubt as to what the phrase "I was there, I can't lie about it" meant in context, why did the judge keep them in jail? Why aren't the defense lawyers raising hell? They are keeping very quiet instead, a telling sign. And to think she was referring to Sollecito's house defies logic: why would she have to lie about being away from the murder scene?

I did read Knox's written statement and I find it both impossible to believe and quite revealing, these two passages for example:

"I stand by my statements that I made last night about events that could have taken place in my home with Patrik, but I want to make very clear that these events seem more unreal to me that what I said before, that I stayed at Raffaele's house."

"I'm trying, I really am, because I'm scared for myself. I know I didn't kill Meredith. That's all I know for sure. In these flashbacks that I'm having, I see Patrik as the murderer, but the way the truth feels in my mind, there is no way for me to have known because I don't remember FOR SURE if I was at my house that night"

So she doesn't clearly remember where she was but she remembers not having killed Kercher. Nobody can be that confused, to me this shows she either in denial of deliberately trying to mislead. Because of her proven lies, I don't believe her claim of police brutality either.
She did implicate Lumumba by the way, that's the only reason he was jailed. Her own words quoted above confirm this. All of the above is well documented, I would pause and think if I were you. And while you are so forcefully supporting your friend, a word of compassion for poor Meredith Kercher and her family wouldn't hurt.

As to the lingerie/underwear episode, it is not directly relevant but indicative of their state of mind a few hours after Knox's body was found. They seem relaxed, even happy, flirting, as testified by the shop owner and as evident in the video, of which you can see snapshots here:
http://www.corriere.it/cronache/07_no...

#28 Italian
(Barcelona, Spain | Unverified Name)

on December 3, 2007 at 3:14 p.m.
Report this comment

"In my mind I saw Patrik in flashes of blurred images. I saw him near the basketball court. I saw him at my front door. I saw myself cowering in the kitchen with my hands over my ears because in my head I could hear Meredith screaming."

#29 Madison
(UW Campus | Unverified Name)

on December 3, 2007 at 5:49 p.m.
Report this comment

Snapshots of them buying underwear, yes. But once again, if they had really been talking about sex and making out, the video would be out publicly. And please don't presume to know about what I have or have not posted concerning Meredith's family. Many times I have expressed my sorrow for them and my hope that they can make it through this horrific time.

But I do not believe for one second that Amanda had anything to do with this. Just as Amanda wrote in her letter to the police, the police told Amanda there was evidence against her that they didn't actually have. She was in a state of shock, was exhausted, was emotionally drained, was yelled at, hit, and told that there was proof of something she did not remember. This would cause confusion in anybody. It is hard to imagine these circumstances, and so it's not surprising that people will not sympathize with Amanda concerning what the police did. Even Lumumba has voiced his anger over the way the police treated him - they did the same to Amanda. As Amanda said, she tried to construct a story that matched what the police told her there was evidence for (which was a lie - no testing had been done yet.) But even so, she told the police that what she saw in her head wasn't real. She told the police that anything she said about Patrick should not be considered in the case, because of the way in which they got this information.

Please understand that I am not trying to blindly stand by my friend. I have looked at all the evidence and feel that this entire case has been handled very strangely. I believe that the police need Amanda to be guilty because they announced that the case was closed four days into the investigation, before DNA testing had even begun. This was not very wise on their part. Now they need her to be guilty or they look like incompetent fools. Please understand that her friends and family have been living an utter nightmare here as we have seen things said about Amanda that are not true. We have listened as she is called a slut, a drunk, a pothead, a person with no soul, a thief, and many other horrible things. This is one of our best friends - we know her. None of this is true. But to portray her this way makes for a great story, and the media has jumped on it. I guarantee you that some one could look at almost any one's myspace or facebook and portray them the way Amanda has been portrayed. That doesn't make it true though - you see a photograph how you want to see it, and when you take that photograph and write your own headlines to it, few people question that interpretation.

Amanda is an amazing student, one of the hardest workers I know, one of the few people I've met who can wake up at 5am every morning for her first job, go to school, go to her second job, then come home and study. It is comical to me that people call her a spoiled rich kid, when she held two jobs and never experienced a luxurious lifestyle at all. She is a beautiful person who is very spiritual, very active, and loves her family and friends. I have never heard her say an unkind word about anybody. She is my only friend I can say that about - probably every else I've ever met I have heard complain about some one, but it wasn't until this all happened that I realized I truly have not heard Amanda talk poorly of any one. We were in constant contact while she was in Italy, and no transformation occurred - she was still the wonderful Amanda that we love dearly. She was happy and excited, and spoke very fondly of her roommates. I know it would be hard for you to see this, as you did not know her, but I hope that people can realize that almost no one is as bad of a person as they are pretending Amanda is. It is ridiculous and unbelievable, yet so many people want to believe this. I stand behind Amanda, I support her, I miss and love her, and I want this all to end so she can come back home and we can have her back. I want the real killer to be brought to justice. What happened is horrible, heartbreaking, and impossible to understand. I wish for justice for Meredith, and hope daily that her killer will be brought to justice.

#30 Alexandra
(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)

on December 3, 2007 at 7:01 p.m.
Report this comment

Again, thank you madison! No one can say that they would be able to withstand the interrogations that Amanda did, with lies being told to her as well as being hit in the head. being hit in the head, contrary to what some believe, can have a jarring effect on a persons thoughts, and after days of no food and this intense questioning and being lied to, who wouldnt be confused? especially when this is all coming in italian and your first language is english? and, it has been psychologically proven that you can confuse someone just by the questioning style you use, and plant false memories in a persons head. its called the misinformation effect, look it up! it does not replace the true memory, but confuses the person, and gives them another memory FORMED BY OUTSIDE INFORMATION. Amanda never changed her story... i'm sorry to dissapoint everyone who wishes to convict her, but Amanda will be proven innocent. Bad media and bad interogation methods have led us to where we are today... so that justice for meredith can be served and peace can be given to her family, lets find the real killer...

#31 Italian
(Barcelona, Spain | Unverified Name)

on December 4, 2007 at 12:29 a.m.
Report this comment

Madison,
I don't dispute that Knox might be all the things you say but the chances are overwhelming that she was involved. Bad things can happen to good people. You need to separate what the sensationalist media are saying from the hard evidence. If she is innocent she only needs to tell the truth, and there is only one truth. Knox's letter is not the letter of a an innocent person. It is a very calculated, albeit clumsy, letter intented to cover herself while hinting that Patrick or Sollecito might have done it. Lumumba hasn't claimed police brutality. Knox is being treated very well, much better than she would be in any US prison. The Italian judicial system is more protective of the rights of the accused and more lenient than the US system. The police are doing an excellent job, your claims of brutality are unsubstantiated. Her own lawyers praised the judge after the last hearing.

#32 Madison
(UW Campus | Unverified Name)

on December 4, 2007 at 12:52 p.m.
Report this comment

Italian,
Amanda is not calculating. She is a very good student and does extremely well in all her classes, but any one who ever knew her could never say she was calculating. I believe some people are not even able to be calculating, and Amanda is one of those people. Her brain doesn't work that way.

And what hard evidence has been proven? I follow every single piece of evidence, and the only thing proven is that Guede was there. The rest of the evidence involving her is surrounded by speculation and multiple interpretations.

In her letter, she specifically said that she believed Patrick did not do it, and that any statement obtained from her regarding Patrick should be discredited, as the circumstances of her interrogation were ...let's just say questionable. And I make no claims about the Italian prisons verses American prisons. But at least in the American legal system, you are given a lawyer immediately. Amanda did not have a lawyer until she was in jail for almost a week - after interrogations. And Amanda did not know that the letter she wrote the police would be leaked - so it is hard to believe it could be calculating at all. It was not intended for the world to see.

I think at this point it would be best for every one to just wait for the VERIFIED test results of the evidence to be released by a LEGITIMATE source. Until then, all I can say is that she's a beautiful person, and all you can say is that there is evidence against her, and we will get nowhere. Wait a week, and more will be released.

#33 Wondrin
(Bellevue, WA | Unverified Name)

on December 5, 2007 at 5:30 p.m.
Report this comment

I was just wondering how Meredith Kerchner's DNA got on the tip of the steaknife found in Amanda's boyfriend's flat. Just wondering.

#34 Answering
(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)

on December 5, 2007 at 6:30 p.m.
Report this comment

It has been proven that that knife was not the murder weapon, that it was skin DNA only, that no one's DNA was on the blade, and that the DNA on the blunt part of the knife has a 10% chance of matching Meredith's.

#35 Italian
(Barcelona, Spain | Unverified Name)

on December 6, 2007 at 5:01 a.m.
Report this comment

It was a letter to the police, of course it is calculated: the very purpose of it is to portray herself in a favorable light. She could have asked for a lawyer when she was first heard. She later declared she didn't ask for one because she didn't think she was a suspect. She was detained on Nov.6th, and got a lawyer on Nov.7th. She has had a month to come clean, yet she hasn't done it. If I was innocent and accused of a crime, I would be screaming the truth. There is no evidence at all that she was mistreated by the police, other than her own letter, which you will admit cannot be held as a standard of truth. And if she was mistreated, then why isn't she sueing the police? Her lawyer has had only words of praise for the work of law enforcement so far. Frankly, to think that the image of Patrick and herself covering her ears was somehow planted in her mind by the police is ludicrous. I think that precisely because the police is under intense international scrutiny, the last thing they want to do is mistreat a witness/accused or fabricate a case that will not stick in court. By the way, in the US she would be facing life imprisonment even if her role in the murder was secondary.

#36 Still Wonderin
(Bellevue, WA | Unverified Name)

on December 7, 2007 at 3:55 p.m.
Report this comment

Timesonline, Nov. 25:
I don't see where it mentions a 10% chance or that the lethal cut didn't come from the bleach-scrubbed knife (Amanda & her honey bought a couple bottles of bleach the on Nov. 1, no doubt for some nice clean fun.
"Police also believe that two knives and not one may have been used in the assault on Ms Kercher. The initial report by Claudia Matteini, the investigating judge, confirmed a finding by Dr Luca Lalli, the pathologist in the case, that the wounds on Ms Kercher's throat were "compatible" with flick knives owned by Mr Sollecito. However a kitchen knife was subsequently found at Mr Sollecito's flat with traces of Ms Kercher's DNA at the tip and of Ms Knox's DNA nearer the handle."

#37 Italian
(Sabadell, Spain | Unverified Name)

on December 8, 2007 at 4:20 a.m.
Report this comment

Alexandra.
Funny you say we should focus on the "true facts" and then you assert Knox was kept "days without food". Where did you get this information from? Let me help you: one of the main motivations the judge gave for keeping Knox and Sollecito in jail are the contradicting accounts of their whereabouts the night of the murder. The only interrogation that mattered in the decision is the one that was conducted the day after her arrest, at which the judge, the prosecutor, the police chief, and Knox's lawyers were all present. Knox is well fed, sees regularly a priest and a psychologists, has TV in her cell, and buys chocolated at the prison grocery's store. She even asked for a guitar.

#38 Gen
(Woomera, Australia | Unverified Name)

on December 8, 2007 at 11:05 p.m.
Report this comment

So Amanda smokes a little pot that afternoon & it puts her in a confused mood. So she uses it as an excuse for not remebering certain things...I think not!! Perhaps if she was into heavier drugs, the story might be a little more credible with her confusion.

#39 amjka
(Brussels, Belgium | Unverified Name)

on December 9, 2007 at 7:17 a.m.
Report this comment

The only thing we know with one hundred percent certainty is that Amanda Knox made up an elaborate story accusing an innocent man of killing her roommate. This woman who is being defended by people so vehemently almost sent a man to jail for the rest of his life. For this very reason alone I would shut my mouth about how great and sweet she is. She obviously has very little regard for the lives of other people.

#40 Gregory
(Belfast, United Kingdom | Unverified Name)

on December 9, 2007 at 10:17 a.m.
Report this comment

Dear Madison

Nobody beat Amanda up. Her boyfriend has a relative in state security. Nobody hurt him either.

"At an end-of-the-year house party the cops showed up for a noise complaint, and she was the only one to talk to them because she was the only one not drunk. Therefore, she got the citation but every one paid for it (her only encounter with the cops) - but I'm sure you knew that because you were obviously so close to her."

I possibly do know the profile better than you. I encounter a lot of girls who work for sex criminals.

One of the best ways to get victims is to go at it under the radar. These days, girls are often involved in very serious sex crime & killings. They may be subordinate roles, but they are no longer spectators.

The sobriety you allege in relation to the domestic ticketing is completely lacking in relation to the sex killng in the EU.

I think the police in WA should investigate what Ms Knox's friends were up to. There is no way this is a one-off.

"her only encounter with the cops"

That is possible, what I a saying is, that it is not right.

Stuff happened *before* Italy.

All the best

Gregory

#41 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations
(Belfast, United Kingdom | Unverified Name)

on December 9, 2007 at 2:47 p.m.
Report this comment

"And I make no claims about the Italian prisons verses American prisons. But at least in the American legal system, you are given a lawyer immediately."

Madison

I don't think so.

With all due respect, that is not true. Even in death penalty cases and despite the VCCR requiring US police authorities to allow access to diplomatic legations. Ms Knox is being treated far better in Italy than many EU citizens are generally treated in the USA.

http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinion...

One of the things we have picked up on, is that the USA requires our countries to treat US citizens better than the USA treats ours. I don't really feel that manda Knox is going to lose weight in jail, nor do I expect electrical burns via torture to be an approaching issue.

Gregory

#42 Amanda Knox in Hollywood
(Belfast, United Kingdom | Unverified Name)

on December 9, 2007 at 2:54 p.m.
Report this comment

"It is guilty until proven innocent in the country of Italy."

I think Amanda Knox is doing okay.

If she was working in Hollywood she would already be on La Luciferina IV. She does a lot of storyboards.

Gregory


Post a comment

Name:


(None, None | Unverified Name)
Login to verify your name

Email:


Required, but not shown.

Comment: