By
Jacob Olson
November 26, 2007
He is an influential martial artist, actor, philosopher and teacher who Time magazine listed as one of the “100 Most Important People of the [20th] Century.”
He attended the UW.
Bruce Lee (whose real name was Jun Fan Lee) studied drama and philosophy at the UW from 1960 to 1963 and left before graduating, yet many are unaware of Lee’s connection with the university.
Seeking to change that, this year 21 students in the CHID 496L focus group “Bruce Lee Dedication,” are working to have a memorial to Lee installed on campus.
The class is based on the premise that Lee, an Asian-American who was raised in Hong Kong, would be more recognized as an alumnus if he were white. Thus, the class’ project is also about combating the alleged inst-itutional racism many class members believe is part of the structure of the UW.
“There are professors that don’t even know Bruce Lee went to the UW,” Jamil Suleman said. “That there is a crime.”
Suleman graduated in 2007 with a CHID degree. The class is his brainchild, and he is facilitating it on a volunteer basis.
The class will officially announce its plan at a press conference scheduled for Nov. 26 — which would be Lee’s 67th birthday — at the Ethnic Cultural Theater at 1:30 p.m.
Members of “Bruce Lee Dedication” hope to persuade the UW administration to designate a piece of property on campus as a memorial for Lee. The Lee family would oversee the design and installment of the actual statue or structure.
“Bruce Lee Dedication” is one of many CHID focus groups this quarter.
Focus groups are two credit classes, graded as credit/no credit, that are designed and often led by students to explore topics not covered elsewhere in the UW curricula.
Other focus groups this quarter include “Religion and Conflict in Battlestar Galactica,” “Queer Performance Poetry” and “Sex + Coffee = ???,” which explores sexism in the coffee industry.
Suleman and several members of “Bruce Lee Dedication” are promoting Lee’s memorial as a means to an end.
Class member Justin Camarata, a senior political science major, said that memorializing Lee is “a good place to start,” but also said that “the issue really isn’t about Bruce Lee; it’s about beginning to provide an accurate representation of who we are as UW students.
In 2005, about 54 percent of incoming freshman identified as white. Suleman, however, said that not one non-white person is memorialized by a statue on campus.
Suleman noted that the lack of recognition of Lee as an alumnus is a glaring example of the fact that “white supremacy is a mainstay of the structure of the UW.” Suleman said he does not really care whether or not a memorial to Lee is built, but that “the whole purpose of the class is to use Lee as a catalyst” to spur campus-wide discussions about institutional racism.
The administration has not commented on memorializing Lee or its perspective on specific claims of institutional racism. The class has not yet presented the administration with its proposition.
While not necessarily opposed to the agenda of their facilitator and some of their classmates, other students in the class see memorializing Lee as a worthy end itself.
Lee is widely revered for his successful and influential life and is a particularly important figure in Asian culture.
“We feel proud to relate to him (Lee),” said freshman Alanna Louie, whose parents were born in China.
Louie said that Lee’s breakthrough into American popular culture is an inspiration to other Asian-Americans seeking success in the United States.
Lee was born in San Francisco in 1940 and grew up with his parents in Hong Kong, where he trained in various styles of martial arts. He moved to Seattle in 1959 and enrolled at the UW the following year.
While at the UW, Lee taught martial arts to several students and met his future wife, Linda Cadwell.
After leaving the UW, Lee taught and competed successfully in marital arts and began his acting career. He starred in several groundbreaking martial arts films and also wrote, directed and choreographed some of the films.
In 1973, Lee died mysteriously a few weeks before the release of his most acclaimed film, “Enter the Dragon.” The film grossed some $90 million worldwide during its initial theatrical release and in 2004 was deemed “culturally significant” and selected for preservation in the National Film Registry.
Lee is also an influential figure in fitness training, nutrition and philosophy. He drew on Taoism, Jiddu Krishnamurti and Buddhism, as well as other traditions to make philosophical assertions about fighting and life.
Erik Ho, a senior American Ethnic Studies major who self-identifies as half-Chinese and half-Japanese, said Lee broke existing stereotypes of Asian-American men as effeminate.
“He proved Asian-Americans could be masculine and tough,” Ho said. “[He] also created more stereotypes as well, like the ‘Kung Fu Fighter.’”
[Reach reporter Jacob Olson at news@thedaily.washington.edu.]
8 Comments
#1 mike
on November 26, 2007 at 4:51 p.m.(New York, NY | Unverified Name)
Bruce Lee is an amazing artist and athlete. He did not "create stereotypes." That dishonor belongs to the racism of Hollywood and the rest of the country. Bruce was the best of the best and deserves a memorial!
#2 newton
on November 27, 2007 at 8:04 a.m.(Milwaukee, WI | Unverified Name)
Bruce Lee was a family favorite in our house -- and we are not Asian. My mother read everything published about him and my brothers and I took up martial arts at young ages. It was his character Kato on the Green Hornet that first caught our imaginations and Enter The Dragon was his triumph.
With all that said, I don't think that he would be impressed to find himself being used as a flag to wave in this manner. Suleman says that he doesn't care if a memorial is built, but rather, that he is to "use Lee as a catalyst." He's admitting to USING Lee's memory for his own agenda. That's disrespectful and manipulative -- and racist itself in its own way. I say honor Lee for his contributions in his arts and his culture, but please, don't use his memory merely as a tool for a self-serving agenda. I don't think that he would appreciate that.
#3 Wesley
on November 28, 2007 at 12:08 a.m.(Martinez, CA | Unverified Name)
He is one of the most famous person ever. I always ask myself why hasn't the school done anything to make it more known or to memorialize him all this time. It's took awefully long but at least something is going to happen at last. Imagine Elvis or Martin Luther King when to this school I bet that they would have been some king of statue or plague for them but nope not for Bruce Lee because he is just a little Asian guy who can kick ass so what they say. Bruce Lee more than anything else is a trendsetter and pioneer. He teached non Chinese how to fight. He married outside his race during a time when it was unthinkable and in many place still unthinkable today. He made fighting into a science before MMA came about or the History Channel's tv show call the Human Weapon. While others at the time just taught fighting from what their masters taught them and just use memorization of forms to learn how to fight. He believe every system was good and bad but most were flawed so he create a new system with really no rules but use what works and discard what doesn't work for you as each individual fighter because every fighter is an individual and every fighter is unique. He changed how action movies are made every since he came on the scene and broke all the rules of boring Hollywood fight scenes and Asian men as a just servants that can never get the leading man part. I could only imagined what have could of accomplish had he lived even 20 or 30 more years then he did.
#4 $>.<$
on December 4, 2007 at 4:08 p.m.(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)
$>.<$....."Knowing i$ not enough we mu$t apply.
Willing i$ not enough we mu$t do."
~Bruce Lee~The Chine$e Connection
Need I say more..........................................
#5 Justine
on January 10, 2008 at 1:47 p.m.(Bremerton, WA | Unverified Name)
I think Bruce Lee was a inspiration for many people and I believe it would be a wonderful idea to put up a memeorial on the University of Washington campus!
#6 nate
on January 14, 2008 at 1:06 a.m.(Davis, CA | Unverified Name)
i absolutely love bruce lee!!
#7 Darby
on January 22, 2008 at 11:26 p.m.(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)
The main criticism against the statue is that Bruce was "Just a Movie star", with racism as a undercurrent. In addition to his revolutionary status as both a martial artist and as a film superstar there are other claims to fame. Bruce advanced philosophy with the tao of jeet kun do. creating the style of no style and the art of fighting without fighting Bruce demonstrates a mastery of philosophy that is worthy of serious recognition. A family man and a truly fine example of virtue should be enough to get recognized, And Bruce taught virtues to countless people across the globe.
#8 jack tell truth
on January 19, 2010 at 5:27 a.m.(Hayward, CA | Unverified Name)
It is stupid for UW not to take the honor for free. You may think UW is something, but who cares ... it is nothing to me and many people.
Post a comment