The Daily of the University of Washington

U-District residents hope extension passes


Share

In response to the ASUW Student Senate’s support for stricter governing of off-campus conduct in the state legislature, U-District community members hope to see the resolution’s high standard of behavior become law.

The resolution — passed under the threat of conduct code legislation by Sen. Ed Murray, D-Seattle — aims at improving on the long-standing adversarial relationship between UW students and U-District residents.

Under the Student Senate’s resolution, existent conduct code violations such as sex-related crime, harassment, physical abuse, stalking and hazing now carry school-related sanctions in addition to preexisting legal consequences. New to the code of conduct is a series of off-campus, quality of life or “party” related offenses that were not previously considered violations. Among the new “party” related offenses are vandalism, public lewdness, theft, noise violations, littering and trespassing.

When [U-District residents] live next door to houses that consistently have parties — not just parties, but loud, after 12 a.m. parties with property destruction — we have an obligation to do something,” Murray said. “Unfortunately, by trying to pass legislation dealing with this problem it makes us look like we’re trying to punish the whole student body.”

Resident complaints range from noise violations and littered beer cans to reports of public defecation, urination and fighting in the middle of the street, Murray said.

I have been to community meeting after community meeting for the past 11 years,” Murray said. “And for the past 11 years I have faced rooms full of my constituents complaining about problems caused by UW students.”

U-District resident and University Park Community Club President Kent Willis, expressed appreciation for the student senate’s resolution, but was skeptical about the effect it would have on student behavior, calling the decision a “paper tiger.”

In order for a student to be punished under the new code they must receive three citations,” Wills said. “I don’t think there is a single UW student dumb enough to get three citations.”

Willis said he has been awakened on countless occasions by people drag racing down his street late at night. In the past, drunken partiers have uprooted trees in his front yard, stolen planter boxes from his front porch to smash in the street and littered his front yard with beer cans.

Recent shootings have also increased awareness of student conduct off campus.

There have been deaths and shootings. People have fallen off balconies. People have thrown TVs out windows,” said ASUW student lobbyist Bryce McKibben. “Most of the problems occurring are coming from students.”

Last year, while serving in the House of Representatives, Murray proposed a similar bill requiring all state universities to extend code of conduct rules beyond their campus grounds. The bill was passed by a vote of 91-3, only to be pulled by Murray to allow students to develop their own means of dealing with the problem.

The UW created the North of 45th committee in response, an effort directed at addressing U-District residents’ complaints through cooperation with UW administrators, students and community members.

Murray said despite some promising signs, he has heard mixed results about the success of the committee.

Willis, a collaborator with the North of 45th group, said though he has been active with the committee for a year, measures discussed by the committee are still in their infancy and have yet to yield results.

ASUW President Cullen White stressed that positive improvements have been made, adding that an unfair amount of blame has been placed on fraternities and sororities.

Fraternities and sororities have done a lot of wonderful things in terms of proactively dealing with this issue,” White said. “The Greeks are now registering all their parties, allowing police to enter and checking student IDs to make sure attendants are UW students. They’re also participating in neighborhood cleanups.”

Non-UW students who are lured into the area by student parties contribute to some of the problems, including the most recent shooting, McKibben said.

While some residents complain the new student conduct code resolution won’t do enough, White disagrees.

We’re an educational institution, not a punitive institution,” he said. “It is our responsibility to educate first.”

Willis wants conduct to change sooner rather than later.

If change doesn’t happen, I will be talking to Sen. Murray about code of conduct legislation for next year,” he said. “We’re fed up.”

Reach reporter Brian Slodysko at news@thedaily.washington.eedu


2 Comments

#1 Jono Hanks
(UW Campus | Unverified Name)

on February 1, 2007 at 2:35 p.m.
Report this comment

I still think that this whole conduct code extension is a waste of time and effort. The problem rests in that noise violations, littering, and public urination/defecation are not high priorities with the police.

Because those complaints are not high priority, the police do not come to every complaint, nor do they give citations out at every complaint. Creating more laws, more processes for the police to enforce and jump through will not help the problem. All it does is create a paper shield that will fall apart the moment it's held up to the problem. Then what will happen? Senator Murray will come back next year, will Mr. Willis pushing him, no doubt, and introduce his legislation anyway.

On another point, Mr. Willis thinks three citations is too much before students face academic sanctions? What does he want? First offense leads to suspension? That's unduly harsh and I think entirely out of the question.

All said, I think the proper solution would be to pass a bond to hire more police and create a squad or a force that's primary purpose is to patrol the area around the University and respond to these types of complaints. If the laws are good enough for non-students to live under, they should be good enough for students too.

#2 Jen
(Hillsboro, OR | Unverified Name)

on February 1, 2007 at 10:48 p.m.
Report this comment

Extending the code of conduct does nothing for the fact that most of the incidents in the U. District have been caused by off-campus students. Perhaps if the police actually enforced existing laws, rather than blowing off complaints because of where people live?


Post a comment

Name:


(None, None | Unverified Name)
Login to verify your name

Email:


Required, but not shown.

Comment: