The Daily of the University of Washington

Watada speaks on duty, democracy


Share

Yesterday, U.S. Army 1st Lt. Ehren K. Watada from Fort Lewis, Wash., visited the UW campus. Watada spoke on his decision to refuse deployment, the illegality of the war in Iraq and his duty as a U.S. military officer.


Photo by Justin Henning.

Lt. Ehren Watada speaks in front of a packed auditorium on Tuesday afternoon. His lecture focused on his experiences and beliefs in the current Iraq war.



Photo by Justin Henning.

Lt. Ehren Watada sits in front of a crowd in Kane hall Wednesday afternoon waiting to lecture on the Iraq war and his experiences.


Lauro H. Flores, chair of the Department of American Ethnic Studies, opened the event.

Watada is not alone … He is among many prominent U.S. military leaders who have declined to participate in a war that they feel has been illegal,” Flores said.

The soldier resistance movement is growing, he said.

[The soldiers] are voicing their opinions against the random, illegitimate violence,” Flores said. “It is their duty to refuse to participate in this war because it is illegal.”

Watada is the first commissioned officer to publicly refuse deployment to Iraq. He is facing more than six years in military prison for missing movement, conduct unbecoming of an officer and contempt towards an officer.

I know my decision to speak out against the war is controversial at the least,” Watada said. “But I believe my highest duty as an officer is to condemn these violations of the law.”

I know that many of you have questions, and I know that some of you in this room despise me,” Watada continued. “I respect that; that is your opinion. All that I ask is that you respect my opinions too.”

Watada recited his military oath, claiming that the oath does not mean that one does not follow blindly no matter the legality of his or her orders. Soldiers are not indentured servants without free will, he said.

I believe that my duty is higher than that … My duty is to protect the American people no matter what costs; my duty is to defend democracy … to keep tyranny and authoritative governments in check,” Watada said.

Students had mixed reactions to Watada’s speech.

I commend him for standing up for his beliefs,” said junior Jacob King. “But I believe that nobody conned him into signing his name on the dotted line; he knew what he was getting himself into.”

Watada, who spent over a year memorizing U.S. law before making his decision, said you must know the law before you can defend the law.

Despite his efforts in self education, the military court will not allow Watada to use any evidence or witnesses in defense of his case on Feb. 5.

I know that the U.S. military is making an example out of my case so that other soldiers will not follow my lead,” Watada said.

Watada asked what will happen when the U.S. has a military that refuses to question the legal nature of orders. His comparison of George W. Bush in the Iraq War and Adolf Hitler in World War II drew a very dark illustration of the U.S.’s future.

Leaders who hear only silence will receive that as a mandate that they are doing the right thing,” Watada said. “When the silence is broke, when words are turned into action, leaders will take notice.”

When the people are silent, it becomes [the military’s] duty to hold accountability for the crimes and conduct of their leaders, Watada said.

Reporter Tina Abrams: tinaabrams@thedaily.washington.edu


1 Comments

#1 SGT Preston Anderson, Junior--Sociology
(UW Campus | Unverified Name)

on February 7, 2007 at 10:41 a.m.
Report this comment

it is a shame that an individual (Lauro H. Flores) with the status and responsibility entrusted to him cannot distinguish the grave error committed by Ehren Watada as insubordination and outright mutinous treachery. i am sure he would take issue with any of his subordinates were they to blatantly countermand his requests or orders. his department would be dysfunctional and would cease to resemble anything remotely efficient. yet he suggests that it is alright to pick and choose ones preference of jobs or duties. how convenient would that be for all of us students, "say, i dont think i will be doing that paper for next week, but give me the grade i request."
secondly, this comparison of the Nuremberg trials is absolutely ridiculous. these trials for one do not dictate UCMJ. aditionally, these underlings were prosecuted for EXCESSES. they killed over six million Jews for Christ's sake! the men and women in our military are no agents of depraved mad men. instead they are exemplary individuals that understand the importance of following orders and not mixing politics or ideology in the execution of orders given by a CIVILIAN body! Do not let these two bodies merge into one another in the pursuit of politics! it would be disasterous. the examples across the globe are legion. it is time for our citizenry to recognize this and to properly assign blame upon those deserving it and in doing so preserve the long storied tradition of our military and its enduring fealty to our constitution! god bless...


Post a comment

Name:


(None, None | Unverified Name)
Login to verify your name

Email:


Required, but not shown.

Comment: