By
Trevor Klein
December 4, 2006
It's been quite a quarter for the paper, but we're just getting started.
With as many changes as we've made throughout this quarter, we've catalyzed a sense of excitement in our staff and an increasingly apparent turning of heads in the campus community. Along with renewed excitement comes a contagious desire to continue inciting changes, creating a cycle we believe is still just beginning.
Thanks in part to the more than 4,000 voices that answered our survey in the spring, this quarter's editors took on some great challenges and are leaving the paper far better than they found it.
There were some sweeping changes: A brand new web team was hired to create and maintain an improved and more interactive online presence for The Daily. The calendar — what used to be a disappointingly short section of Page 2 — was given a much larger and more prominent weekly space.
Some changes were to correct very specific issues —moving the crossword off the fold in the middle of the paper, for example.
We began taking additional steps to prevent spelling and grammatical errors. We placed a greater emphasis on stories that run in series. We came up with new ways for readers to submit content, and don't think for a minute we're stopping there.
As editors are selected and goals are set for winter quarter, we're thinking of new ways we can improve the paper, never forgetting the more than 4,000 suggestions we already have.
We're aiming to dramatically increase the amount of "digging" our reporters do to uncover truly interesting stories. By continually finding ways to make our newsroom more efficient, and by providing some very specific training, we can make strides in bringing the readers stories they won't find anywhere else.
We're looking into a myriad of new ideas for Intermission, broadening the scope of the articles to include possible content like the science of food and a sort of arts-based Free Speech Friday.
The Web site will continue to undergo major construction to make it as interactive and intuitive as possible. Podcasts, an expansion into new media we experimented with this quarter, will see growth and maturation in an effort to become a recognized part of The Daily's online experience.
During this whole process, your feedback has been immensely helpful. We just ask that you keep it coming. Keep sending us letters, and finding ways to tell us what you think. Don't worry, we'll keep the crossword off the fold.
1 Comments
#1 Jonathan Lee
on December 4, 2006 at 5:46 p.m.(Seattle, WA | Unverified Name)
I have always had a love hate relationship with The Daily over the past four years but now I must actually commend you now for the improvement that have been made over the past quarter. As a ASUW alum, it was nearly mandated that we had to hate you and you hate us as entities, no matter how many friends I had working for the publication. But aside from the typical "you misquoted me" issues, your improvements in the layout, quality and relevance of articles have been stunning. When Kristin came to the Faculty Council on Student Affairs meeting last spring to outline the changes she envisioned, my gut reaction was to say, yeah right. I'm glad to say I have been proven somewhat wrong.
The new web version of the paper is great, albeit missing the letters to the editor which is the typical gripe (I understand that there might not be many) but it would be nice to see some posted online and not just printed. The breadth of your reporting is nice as evidenced by your coverage of graduate student events and I understand that you guys don't know everything that is going on but people don't know that they should contact you or from prior experience, they just might have been ignored. The paper is a powerful tool to not only build campus cohesion but create accountability. For example today, the article about the snow closure was interesting. Most people don't know that UW has only closed twice during the past decade but who cares about walking around campus or a nice X on red square when close to 70% of the campus commutes? And if it were to be finals or if a paper were to be due what recourse would students have? I don't mean to sound critical. I do really want to give you props on the major improvements and any future improvements you do make. Two last things, take a page from the 80's, student pub put out some of the best articles during that time.(I've gone through issues going back to the 40's) and for the love of god tell your reporters to stop calling people after midnight...
I wish you all the best.
Cheers,
Jonathan `06
Post a comment